HILLWOOD TIMERS V. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONE OF INCOME TAX

WP(C)/4440/2018

AI Insights

The case involves Hillwood Timbers, the petitioner, who is an assessee under the Income Tax Act, challenging the assessment orders for the years 2012-13 and 2013-14. The assessments were made under Section 153A of the Act, and the appeals against these assessments were pending. The petitioner sought a stay on the payment of 20% of the assessed amount, which was a condition for the stay granted by the assessing authority. The court heard the arguments and decided to allow the petitioners to apply for a stay before the Appellate Authority, with a directive for the Appellate Authority to decide on these applications promptly.

• Counselvise Citation: [2018] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 699320 (HC-KERALA)
• Appeal Type: Others
• Pronouncement Date: 19-02-2018
• Assessment Year: misc
• Laws Referred To: Income Tax Act
• Result in Favour of: Partly Allowed
• Court: HIGH COURT
• Department Lawyers: JOSE JOSEPH; CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM
• Assessee Lawyers: P RAGHUNATHAN; PREMJIT NAGENDRAN
• Keywords: Appeal; Assessment Order; Income Tax; Stay Application
• Section: 153A; 220(6)

Judgement Text

" IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR MONDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2018 / 30TH MAGHA, 1939 WP(C).No. 4440 of 2018 -------------------- PETITIONER(S) HILLWOOD TIMBERS DOOR NO.XI/67C; PUNARPA; MAKKARAPPARAMBA; MALAPPURAM; REP.BY MANAGING PARTNER V.SHAREEF. BY ADVS.SRI.P.RAGHUNATHAN. SRI.PREMJIT NAGENDRAN. RESPONDENT(S): 1. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-2; KOZHIKODE; 673 001. 2. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-III KOCHI - 682 036. 3. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE; ERNAKULAM -682 018. BY ADVS. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX. SRI.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19-02-2018 ALONG WITH W.P.C.NO.4448/2018 AND W.P.C.NO.4449/2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: DXY WP(C).No. 4440 of 2018 (D) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 : ANNEXURE TO ASSMT. ORDER FOR 2012.13. EXHIBIT P2 : ANNEXURE TO ASSMT. ORDER FOR 2013.14. EXHIBIT P3 : IT COMPUTATION & DEM.NOTE: 2012.13. EXHIBIT P4 : IT COMPUTATION & DEM.NOTE: 2013-14. EXHIBIT P5 : APPEAL AGAINST ASSESSMENT FOR 2012.13. EXHIBIT P6 : APPEAL AGAINST ASSESSMENT FOR 2013-14. EXHIBIT P7 : NOTICE DATED 16.01.2018 TO DEBTORS. RESPONDENT(S)'EXHIBITS: NIL TRUE COPY PA TO JUDGE DXY P.B.SURESH KUMAR, J. -------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).Nos.4440, 4448 & 4449 of 2018 --------------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 19th day of February, 2018 J U D G M E N T Petitioners in these writ petitions are assessees under the Income T ax Act (the Act). They have been assessed for the various years mentioned in the writ petitions under Section 153A of the Act. The petitioners challenged the assessment orders in appeal and the appeals preferred by the petitioners in this regard are pending. In the meanwhile, the petitioners have applied for stay before the assessing authority invoking sub- section (6) of Section 220 of the Act and the assessing authority, in terms of various orders produced in these matters, granted the stay sought for by the petitioners, on W.P.(c).Nos.4440, 4448 and 4449 of 2018 : 2 : condition that they should remit 20% of the demand. The case of the petitioners is that 20% of the amount directed to be paid in terms of the orders issued under sub-section (6) of Section 220 of the Act comes to several crores. It is the further case of the petitioners that the appeals preferred by the petitioners against the assessment orders mentioned in the writ petitions have been partly heard by the Appellate Authority on 12/02/2018, 13/02/2018 and 15/02/2018 respectively. The petitioners, therefore, seek directions to the Appellate Authority to dispose of the appeals itself on merits. They also seek directions to the respondents to refrain from initiating proceedings for realization of the amounts covered by the assessment orders, till the disposal of the appeals. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as also the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, especially the fact that the appeals were partly heard, I deem it appropriate to permit the petitioners to W.P.(c).Nos.4440, 4448 and 4449 of 2018 : 3 : move applications for stay before the Appellate Authority in all the pending appeals. It is also directed that if the petitioners prefer applications for stay as permitted above within a week, the Appellate Authority shall consider the same and pass orders within a week thereafter. Petitioners shall produce a copy of this judgment for compliance before the Appellate Authority. Needless to say that if the petitioners prefer applications for stay as directed above, till orders are passed on the applications, further proceedings for realization of the amounts covered by the orders impugned in the appeals referred to in the writ petitions, shall be deferred. Ordered accordingly. Sd/- P.B.SURESH KUMAR JUDGE rsr "