"IN THE HIGH COURT FOR AT HYDPREABXITE OF TELANGANA Mo!p4y, THE STXTH DAy oF sEPTEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR t.A.NO. oF 2021 IN/AND .T.T.A.NO.697 oF 201 lncome Tax Tribunar Appear under section 260-4 of the Income Tax Act -1961 against the order dated 23.0s.2014 in l.T.A.No.'1083l1ydt2o11 Assessment yeat 2oo4- 2005 to 2009-2010 on the file of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'A', Hyderabad the Assessment year 2006-2007 to 2009-2010, preferred against the order dated 25.03.2011 in Appeat No.trA No.026ilctr [A]-il/09-10, on rhe fite of the commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals)-ll, Hyderabad preferred against the order in GIR/PAN No. Hyd 100916G on the fite of the lncome Tax officer, circle 14(2), Hyderabad. 1 Between: IDEA Cellular Limited, a Company incorporated under the Companies, Act, 1956, having its Registered Office a1 # Plot No.18, Suman Towers, Sectoi 1'1 , Gandhi Nagar 382011, and Circle office at KLK Estate,3rd Floor, Fateh Maidan Road, Hyderabad-510 001, represented by its Authorised Representative Mr. Giridhar Rao, Manager-Legal and Authorised Signatory Counsel for the Appellant: SRI T. VINOD KUMAR, representing SRI T. BALA MOHAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: SRI B. NARASIMHA SARMA, SC FOR l.T. DEPT. The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT ...APPELLANT AND The Commissioner of lncome Tax [fDS] l.T. Towers, A.C. Guards, Hyderabad ...RESPONDENT lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the Hon'ble Court may be pleased to permit the Appellant to withdraw the present appeal in ITTA No. 697 of 2014. HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR I.A. No.L of 2O2l IN/AND I.T.T.A. No.697 OF 2014 COMMON ORDER: (Per the Acting Chief Justice Si M.SRamachandra Rrro) The appellant has filed I.A.No.1 of 2O2l seeking permission to withdraw the appeal in view of the order in Form No.3 dated 30.03.202 1 passed under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. 2. Having regard to the said p1ea, I.A.No.1 of 202 1 is ordered and ITTA.No.697 of 2014 is dismissed as withdrawn In the event, the appellant does not get favotLrable relief under the said scheme, it is granted liberty to revive this appeal. 3. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, in this appeal shall also stand. dismissed. //TRUE COPY// SD/. M.SANTHI VARDHANI JOINT REGISTRAR Ctt SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Chairman, lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal 'A' Bench' Hyderabad 2. The Commissioner of lncome Tax Appeals-ll' Hyderabad. 3. The lncome Tax Officer, Circle 14 (2), Hyderabad' 4. One CC to Sri T. Bala Mohan Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 5. One CC to Sri B. Narasimha Sarman, SC for lT Dept lOPUCl 6. Two CD CoPies 7. One Spare CoPY gbr a.u- I HIGH COURT DATED: 0610912021 JUDGMENT f .A.No.1 of 2021 IN/AND lTTA.No.697 ot 2014 ORDERING THE !.A. AND DISMISSING THE I.T.T.A. AS WITHDRAWN + ,sr:a 't: T4 ,-€ E i{ a< .t J ) :-) 2 siP U 2r 5 2 "