Shri Kalpesh Kantilal Patel, Ahmedabad V. The Income tax Officer,Ward-9(2), Ahmedabad

ITA 1000/AHD/2013

• Counselvise Citation: [2016] 133 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 1396 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 year(s) 1 month(s) 25 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 06-06-2016
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Next Hearing Date: 02-06-2016
• Assessment Year: 2006-2007
• Appeal Filed On: 11-04-2013
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: VILAS V SHINDE
• Keywords: Reasonable cause

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL SMC BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE SHRI R.P. TOLANI, JUDICIAL MEMBER ./ ././ ./ ITA NO. 1000/AHD/2013 / // / ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2006-07 SHRI KALPESH KANTILAL PATEL, 30, AMBICA SOCIETY, USMANPURA, AHMEDABAD-380014 PAN : AAWPP 5054 D VS INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 9(2), AHMEDABAD / // / (APPELLANT) / // / (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : NONE REVENUE BY : SHRI VILAS V. SHINDE, SR DR. / // / DATE OF HEARING : 02/06/2016 / // / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 06/06/2016 / // / O R D E R THIS APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-XV, AHMEDABAD DATED 01.03.2013 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006-07. 2. NOTICE OF HEARING WAS SENT BY REGISTERED POST WI TH ACKNOWLEDGEMENT DUE TO THE ASSESSEE ON 20.05.2016 F IXING THE DATE OF HEARING ON 02.06.2016, WHICH WAS RETURNED BY THE PO STAL AUTHORITIES UNSERVED WITH THE REMARKS LEFT. NO CHANGE OF ADD RESS HAS BEEN PROVIDED BY THE ASSESSEE. THIS SHOWS THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PURSUING WITH HIS APPEAL. THEREFORE, IN VIEW OF THE DECISIO N OF HON'BLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF ESTATE OF LATE TU KOJIRAO HOLKAR VS. CWT (1997) 223 ITR 480 (M.P.) AND THE DECISION OF HON'B LE DELHI TRIBUNAL IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA (PVT.) LTD., 38 IT D 320 (DELHI), I DISMISS THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IN LIMINE . 3. THE ASSESSEE MAY, IF SO ADVISED, FILE AN APPLICA TION BEFORE THIS TRIBUNAL FOR RESTORATION OF HIS APPEAL AND HEARING ON MERITS BY SHOWING SMC-ITA NO.1000/AHD/2013 SHRI KALPESH KANTILAL PATEL VS. ITO AY : 2006-07 2 REASONABLE CAUSE FOR NOT APPEARING BEFORE THE TRIBU NAL ON THE DATE OF HEARING. THE BENCH, IF SO SATISFIED, MAY RECALL IT S ORDER AND RESTORE THE APPEAL TO ITS ORIGINAL NUMBER FOR HEARING ON MERITS . 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DIS MISSED IN LIMINE . ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE COURT ON 6 TH JUNE, 2016 AT AHMEDABAD. SD/- R.P. TOLANI (JUDICIAL MEMBER) AHMEDABAD; DATED 06/06/2016 *BIJU T. / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. / THE APPELLANT 2. / THE RESPONDENT. 3. / CONCERNED CIT 4. ( ) / THE CIT(A) 5. , , / DR, ITAT, AHMEDABAD 6. / GUARD FILE. / BY ORDER, TRUE COPY / // / ( DY./ASSTT.REGISTRAR) , , , , / ITAT, AHMEDABAD