Sh. Harpal Singh, Meerut V. ITO, Meerut

ITA 1022/DEL/2015

• Counselvise Citation: [2015] 121 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 1720 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 7 month(s) 19 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 09-10-2015
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC 2
• Next Hearing Date: 07-09-2015
• Assessment Year: 2004-2005
• Appeal Filed On: 19-02-2015
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: RAMAN KANT GARG

Judgement Text

1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH SMC - 2 , NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI J. SUDHAKAR REDDY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO. 1022 /DEL/201 5 AY: 20 04 - 05 SH. HARPAL SINGH VS. ITO S/O DAULAT RAM WARD 1(3) C/O PRADEEP KUMAR CHAUHAN ADVOCATE K 70, PALLAVPURAM PHASE 2 POST MODIPURAM MEERUT PAN: ACPPH 5385 N (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY : SH. RAMAN KANT GARG, SR.D.R. ORDER THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER DT. 18.2.2014 OF LD.CIT(A) , MEERUT FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 20 04 - 05 . 2. ON THE DATE OF HEARING I.E. ON 07 TH SEPTEMBER, 2015 , NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE NOR ANY ADJOURNMENT APPLICATION WAS RECEIVED DESPITE ISSUAL OF NOTICE BY RPAD. HENCE IT IS PRESUMED THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THE APPEAL. 3. FOLLOWING THE DECISIONS IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA P.LTD. 38 ITD, 320 (DELHI), AND THE DECISION OF THE HON BLE BOMBAY HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF M/S CHEMIPOL VS. UOI AND OTHERS IN CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 62/2009 JUDGEMENT DT. 17 TH SEPTEMBER,2009, I CONSIDER IT A FIT CASE FOR D ISMISSING THE APPEALS IN LIMINE, AS NOT ADMITTED. IT IS TO CLARIFY THAT SUBSEQUENTLY, IF THE ASSESSEE EXPLAINS THE REASONS FOR NON - APPEARANCE AND IF 2 THE BENCH IS SO SATISFIED, THE MATTER MAY BE RECALLED FOR THE PURPOSE OF ADJUDICATION OF THE APPEAL. 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE STANDS DISMISSED FOR NON - PROSECUTION. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 09 TH OCTOBER ,2015. SD/ - (J.SUDHAKAR REDDY) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER DATED: THE 09 TH OCTOBER , 2015 *MANGA COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. APPELLANT; 2.RESPONDENT; 3.CIT; 4.CIT(A); 5.DR; 6.GUARD FILE BY ORDER ASST. REGISTRAR