IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CHANDIGARH BENCH A, CHANDIGARH BEFORE SHRI T.R. SOOD, A.M AND MS. SUSHMA CHOWLA, J M ITAS NO. 1028 TO 1031/CHD/2011 A.YS: 2006-07 TO 2009-10 JT. SUB REGISTRAR V. D.I.T (CIB), CHANDIGARH ALEWA JIND RTKSI 4244 G ITAS NO. 1032 TO 1034/CHD/2011 A.YS: 2007-08 TO 2009-10 SUB REGISTRAR V. D.I.T (CIB), CHANDIGARH JULANA JIND RTKSI 4245 A (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY : SHRI AKHILESH GUPTA DATE OF HEARING : 31.07.2012 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 31.07.2012 O R D E R PER T.R.SOOD, A.M IN THESE APPEALS THE ASSESSEES HAVE RAISED VARIOUS GROUNDS OF APPEAL. 2. THESE APPEALS WERE FIXED FOR HEARING ON 31.7.201 2. A NOTICE WAS SENT TO THE ASSESSEES THROUGH RPAD FOR H EARING THE APPEAL. BUT ON THE DATE OF HEARING I.E. 31.7.2012 N OBODY APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE NOR ANY APPLICAT ION WAS MOVED FOR ADJOURNMENT. IT SEEMS THAT THE ASSESSEES ARE NOT INTERESTED IN PURSUING THE APPEALS AND THE INSTANT APPEALS ARE LIABLE TO BE DISMISSED. IN THIS CASE WE ARE FORTIF IED BY THE FOLLOWING CASE LAWS: (I) CIT V. MULTI PLAN INDIA LTD, 38 ITD 320 (DELHI) (II) ESTATE OF LALTE TUKAJIRAO HOLKAR V. CWT, 223 ITR 480 (MP) 2 (III) CIT V. B.N. BHATTACHARJEE & ANOTHER, 18 ITR 4 61. 3. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE CITED CASE LAWS WE DISMISS THE APPEALS OF THE ASSESSEES FOR NON PROSECUTION. 4. IN THE RESULT, ALL THE APPEALS OF THE ASSESSEES ARE DISMISSED IN LIMINE. ORDER PRONOUNCED ON 31.07.2012 SD/- SD/- (SUSHMA CHOWLA) (T.R. SOOD) JUDICAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER DATED : 31.07. 2012 SURESH COPY TO: THE APPELLANT/THE RESPONDENT/THE CIT/THE C IT(A)/THE DR 3