Rashi Goyal, New Delhi V. ITO, Ward-57(2), New Delhi

ITA 1046/DEL/2019

• Counselvise Citation: [2021] 108 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 3605 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s) 3 month(s) 27 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 08-06-2021
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Assessment Year: 2014-2015
• Appeal Filed On: 11-02-2019
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI SMC-1 BENCH: NEW DELHI (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING ) BEFORE SHRI KUL BHARAT, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI O.P.KANT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO.1046/DEL/2019 ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2014-15 RASHI GOYAL, C/O-M.K.BHATT & CO., CAS, 302, TRIVENI COMPLEX, E-10/12, JAWAHAR PARK, LAXMI NAGAR, NEW DELHI-110092. PAN-AGYPG8346D VS ITO, WARD-57(2), NEW DELHI. APPELLANT RESPONDENT APPELLANT BY NONE RESPONDENT BY SH. R.K.GUPTA, SR.DR DATE OF HEARING 08.06.2021 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 08.06.2021 ORDER PER KUL BHARAT, JM : THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE FOR THE ASSESSMEN T YEAR 2014-15 IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF LEARNED CIT(A)-37, NE W DELHI DATED 27.12.2018. 2. NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE AT THE T IME OF VIRTUAL HEARING BEFORE US. THE ASSESSEE, VIDE ITS LETTER DATED 19.11.2020/07.04.2021 RECEIVED THROUGH EMAIL, HAS R EQUESTED FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE APPEAL FILED BY HIM AND STATED TH AT THE ASSESSEE HAS OPTED TO SETTLE THE DISPUTE RELATING TO THE TAX ARR EARS FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR UNDER CONSIDERATION UNDER THE VIVAD SE VISHWA S SCHEME, 2020. 3. CONSIDERING THE AFORESAID SITUATION, THE CAPTION ED APPEAL IS CONSIGNED TO RECORDS AND TREATED AS DISMISSED. ITA NO. 1046/DEL/2019 4. HOWEVER, THE AFORESAID IS SUBJECT TO A CAVEAT TH AT IN CASE THE DISPUTE RELATING TO TAX ARREARS FOR THE CAPTIONED ASSESSMEN T YEAR IS NOT ULTIMATELY RESOLVED IN TERMS OF THE AFORESTATED ACT, THE APPEL LANT (I.E., THE ASSESSEE) SHALL BE AT LIBERTY TO APPROACH THE TRIBUNAL FOR RE INSTITUTION OF THE APPEAL AND THE TRIBUNAL SHALL CONSIDER SUCH APPLICATION AP PROPRIATELY AS PER LAW. THE RESPONDENT (I.E., THE REVENUE) HAS NO OBJECTION WITH REGARD TO THE AFORESAID CAVEAT. 5. IN VIEW OF THE AFORESAID, THE APPEAL IS CONSIGNE D TO RECORD AND, FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES, IS TREATED AS DISMISSED. ABOVE DECISION WAS PRONOUNCED ON CONCLUSION OF VIRT UAL HEARING ON 08 TH JUNE, 2021. SD/- SD/- (O.P.KANT) (KUL B HARAT) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIA L MEMBER *AMIT KUMAR* COPY FORWARDED TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(APPEALS) 5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT, NEW DELHI