, , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL A BENCH: CHENNAI . , .. ', BEFORE SHRI ABRAHAM P.GEORGE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI DUVVURU R.L.REDDY, JUDICIAL MEMBER ./ ITA NO.1056/CHNY/2018 $% % /ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2008-09 THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF- INCOME TAX. CORPORATE CIRCLE-6(2), AAYAKAR BHAVAN, NEW BLOCK, 7 TH FLOOR, 121 M.G.ROAD, CHENNAI-600 034. VS. M/S.SOUNDARARAJA MILLS- PVT. LTD., SOUNDARAJA BUILDING, GTN SALAI, NGO COLONY, DINDIGUL-642 005. [PAN: AAACS 8799 R ] ( ( /APPELLANT) ( )*( /RESPONDENT) DEPARTMENT BY : MR.HOMI RAJVANSH, CIT ASSESSEE BY : MR.R.KUMAR, ADV. 3 /DATE OF HEARING : 03.09.2018 3 /DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 04.09.2018 / O R D E R PER DUVVURU R.L.REDDY, JUDICIAL MEMBER : THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE IS DIRECTED AGAIN ST THE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-15, CHENNAI, I N ITA NO.584/CIT(A)-15/2013-14 DATED 27.12.2017 FOR THE A Y 2008-09. 2. THE COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE POINTED OUT THAT TH E TAX EFFECT IN THIS CASE WAS LESS THAN RS.20.00 LAKHS. HENCE, THE APPE AL OF THE REVENUE ::2:: ITA NO.1056/CHNY/2018 WOULD NOT LIE BEFORE THIS TRIBUNAL BY VIRTUE OF CBD T CIRCULAR NO. 3/2018 DATED 11.07.2018. 3. LD. DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE FAIRLY AGREED TH AT THE TAX EFFECT WAS LESS THAN RS.20.00 LAKHS. 4. WE HAVE HEARD THE RIVAL CONTENTIONS AND PERUSED THE ORDERS OF THE AUTHORITIES BELOW. 5. THE TAX EFFECT IN THE APPEAL OF THE REVENUE BEIN G LESS THAN RS.20.00 LAKHS, IT CANNOT SURVIVE. 6. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE I S DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED ON SEPTEMBER 04, 2018 IN CHENNAI. SD/- SD/- ( . ) ( ABRAHAM P.GEORGE ) /ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ( . . ' ) ( DUVVURU R.L. REDDY ) $ /JUDICIAL MEMBER /CHENNAI, 8 /DATED: SEPTEMBER 04, 2018. TLN 3 )$9: ;: /COPY TO: 1. ( /APPELLANT 4. < /CIT 2. )*( /RESPONDENT 5. : )$$ /DR 3. < ( ) /CIT(A) 6. % /GF