SMT. MITHILESH MAHESHWARI, JAIPUR V. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3-2, JAIPUR

ITA 1074/JPR/2019

• Counselvise Citation: [2021] 108 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 6443 (ITAT-JAIPUR)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 7 month(s) 16 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 16-04-2021
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Assessment Year: 2009-2010
• Appeal Filed On: 30-08-2019
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: MONISHA CHOUDHARYADDL CIT DHK
• Assessee Lawyers: S L PODDAR

Judgement Text

VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES B, JAIPUR JH LANHI XLKA ] U;KF;D LNL; ,OA JH FOE FLAG ;KNO] YS[KK LNL; DS LE{K BEFORE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM VK;DJ VIHY LA -@ ITA NO. 1074/JP/2019 FU/KZKJ.K O'KZ@ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2009-10 SMT. MITHILESH MAHESHWARI, D-19, GOVIND BHAWAN, MEERA MARG, BANIPARK, JAIPUR. CUKE VS. I.T.O., WARD 3(2), JAIPUR. LFKK;H YS[KK LA -@THVKBZVKJ LA-@ PAN/GIR NO.: ABCPM 5403 C VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ LS @ ASSESSEE BY: SHRI S.L. PODDAR (ADV) JKTLO DH VKSJ LS @ REVENUE BY: SMT. MONISHA CHOUDHARY(ADDL.CIT) LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[K@ DATE OF HEARING : 25/03/2021 MN?KKS 'K.KK DH RKJH[K @ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 16/04/2021 VKNS'K@ ORDER PER: SANDEEP GOSAIN, J.M. THIS APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE LD. CIT(A)-1, JAIPUR DATED 02/05/2019 FOR THE A.Y. 2009-10. 2. THE HEARING OF THE APPEAL WAS CONCLUDED THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE IN VIEW OF THE PREVAILING SITUATION OF COVID-19 PANDEMIC. 3. THE LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE FURNISHED AN APPLICATION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THIS APPEAL. THE CONTENTION MADE IN THE SAID APPLICATION READS AS UNDER: WITH REFERENCE TO ABOVE THE ASSESSEE HAS APPLIED FOR VIVAAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME FOR SETTLING THE DISPUTE AND FORM NO. 3 WITH REFERENCE NO. 230364770280121 HAS BEEN RECEIVED ON 28/01/2021. ITA 1074/JP/2019_ SMT. MITHILESH MAHESHWARI VS ITO 2 COPY OF FORM NO. 3 HAS ALREADY BEEN SUBMITTED. WE HAVE ALSO FILED FORM NO. 4. THEREFORE, YOU ARE REQUESTED TO ALLOW THE WITHDRAWAL OF APPEAL AND OBLIGE. THANKING YOU YOURS FAITHFULLY (S.L. PODDAR) COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE 4. THE LD DR HAS RAISED NO OBJECTION IF THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS ALLOWED TO BE WITHDRAWN. 5. THEREFORE, IN VIEW OF THE FACT THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS ALREADY APPROACHED THE DEPARTMENT TO SETTLE THE MATTER UNDER VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME, WE PERMIT THE ASSESSEE TO WITHDRAW HER APPEAL. ACCORDINGLY, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. 6. IN THE RESULT, THIS APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 16 TH APRIL, 2021. SD/- SD/- FOE FLAG ;KNO LANHI XLKA (VIKRAM SINGH YADAV) (SANDEEP GOSAIN) YS[KK LNL;@ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER U;KF;D LNL;@ JUDICIAL MEMBER TK;IQJ@ JAIPUR FNUKAD@ DATED:- 16/04/2021 *RANJAN VKNS'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSFKR @ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. VIHYKFKHZ @ THE APPELLANT- SMT. MITHILESH MAHESHWARI, JAIPUR. ITA 1074/JP/2019_ SMT. MITHILESH MAHESHWARI VS ITO 3 2. IZR;FKHZ @ THE RESPONDENT- THE I.T.O., WARD 3(2), JAIPUR. 3. VK;DJ VK;QDR @ CIT 4. VK;DJ VK;QDRVIHY @ THE CIT(A) 5. FOHKKXH; IZFRFUF/K] VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ @ DR, ITAT, JAIPUR 6. XKMZ QKBZY @ GUARD FILE (ITA NO. 1074/JP/2019) VKNS'KKUQLKJ @ BY ORDER, LGK;D IATHDKJ @ ASST. REGISTRAR