, , , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL A BENCH : KOLKATA [ () , , . .. . ! ! ! !. .. . , , , , '# ] ]] ] [BEFORE HONBLE SRI MAHAVIR SINGH, JM & HONBLE S RI C. D. RAO, AM] % / I.T.A NO. 1115/KOL/2010 &' ()/ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2006-07 MAHENDRA SINGH CHOUHAN -VS.- I.T.O.WARD-1(2)DURGAPUR DURGAPUR (PAN:ADMPC 1094 K) [ +, /APPELLANT ] [ -.+,/ RESPONDENT ] +, / FOR THE APPELLANT : NONE (A/D CARD ON RECOR D) -.+, / FOR THE RESPONDENT : SHRI A.K.PRAMANIK '/ /ORDER . .. . ! ! ! !. .. . , , , , '# PER C. D. RAO, A. M. THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE FOR ASSES SMENT YEAR 2006-07 AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE LD. CIT(A)-DURGAPUR DATED 23.02.2010. 2. THIS APPEAL CAME FOR HEARING ON 10.08.2010 FOR T HE FIRST TIME AND SUBSEQUENTLY ON 21.10.2010, 10.01.2011, 08.04.2011 AND FINALLY O N 18.07.2011. NO ONE WAS PRESENT ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. NO ADJOURNMENT PETITION WAS MOVED. IT MEANS THAT ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED TO PROSECUTE THE APPEAL. 3. CONSIDERING THE FACTS AND KEEPING IN MIND THE DE CISION IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA PVT. LTD., 38 ITD 320, WE DISMISS THE APPEAL AS ASSESSEE NOT INTERESTED. 2 4. HOWEVER, THE ASSESSEE SHALL BE AT LIBERTY TO APP ROACH THE TRIBUNAL FOR RECALLING THIS ORDER, IF PREVENTED BY SUFFICIENT CAUSE FOR NO N-APPEARANCE ON THE DATE OF HEARING. 5. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DIS MISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION. '/ #0' 1 0& 2 3 !# ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 18.07. 2011. SD/- SD/- [ , ] [ . !., '# ] [ MAHAVIR SINGH ] [ C. D. RAO ] JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (!#) DATED : 18.07. 2011. [RG &45 6 /.PS] '/ 7 -8 9'8(/ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. +, /APPELLANT : MAHENDRA SINGH CHOUHAN, 1/33, ISPATPA LLY, BIDHAN NAGAR, DURGAPUR-713212. 2 -.+, / I.T.O., WARD-1 (2), DURGAPUR. 3. /&/ THE CIT, 4. /& ()/ THE CIT(A)-DURGAPUR. 5. ?2 -&/ DR, KOLKATA BENCHES, KOLKATA [.8 -/ TRUE COPY] '/&0/ BY ORDER, 5 /ASSTT REGISTRAR