IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CHANDIGARH BENCH A, CHANDIGARH BEFORE SHRI H.L. KARWA, VP AND SHRI T.R. SOOD, A.M ITA NO. 1129/CHD/2010 ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2006-07 SHRI VIKRANT THAKUR V ADDL CIT, MANDI RANGE PROP M/S RAJVANSHI COORRU- MANDI GATING PACKING INDUSTRY VILLAGE GHOURDOUR PO LARAKELLON DISTT. KULLU ADHPT 3814 H (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY : SHRI N.K. SAINI DATE OF HEARING : 29.8.2012 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 29.8.2012 O R D E R PER T.R.SOOD, A.M IN THIS APPEAL THE ASSESSEE HAS RAISED VARIOUS GROU NDS OF APPEAL. 2. THIS APPEAL WAS FIXED FOR HEARING ON 29.8.2012. A NOTICE WAS SENT TO THE ASSESSEE THROUGH RPAD FOR HEARING T HE APPEAL. BUT ON THE DATE OF HEARING I.E. 29.8.2012 NOBODY AP PEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE NOR ANY APPLICATION WAS MOVE D FOR ADJOURNMENT. IT SEEMS THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INT ERESTED IN PURSUING THE APPEAL AND THE INSTANT APPEAL IS LIABL E TO BE DISMISSED. IN THIS CASE WE ARE FORTIFIED BY THE FO LLOWING CASE LAWS: (I) CIT V. MULTI PLAN INDIA LTD, 38 ITD 320 (DELHI) (II) ESTATE OF LALTE TUKAJIRAO HOLKAR V. CWT, 223 ITR 480 (MP) (III) CIT V. B.N. BHATTACHARJEE & ANOTHER, 18 ITR 4 61. 2 3. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE CITED CASE LAWS WE DISMISS THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE FOR NON PROSECUTION. 4. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISS ED IN LIMINE. ORDER PRONOUNCED ON 29.08.2012 SD/- SD/- (H.L. KARWA) (T.R. SOOD ) VICE PRESIDENT ACCOUNTANT MEMBER DATED : 29 .8. 2012 SURESH COPY TO: THE APPELLANT/THE RESPONDENT/THE CIT/THE C IT(A)/THE DR 3