Somnath Vaijanath Sakre, Aurangabad V. Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax -2, Aurangabad

ITA 1140/PUN/2018

• Counselvise Citation: [2022] 106 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 8964 (ITAT-PUNE)
• Duration Of Justice: 4 year(s) 2 month(s) 14 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 07-09-2022
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: B
• Assessment Year: 2013-2014
• Appeal Filed On: 24-06-2018
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL

Judgement Text

॥ आयकर अपीलीय न्यायाधिकरण, पुणे न्यायपीठ, “बी” बेंच, पुणे में ॥ ITAT-Pune Page 1 of 3 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PUNE “B” BENCH, PUNE BEFORE SHRI SS VISWANETHRA RAVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI G. D. PADMAHSHALI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपीऱ सं. / ITA No. 1140/PUN/2018 निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2013-2014 Somnath Vaijanath Sakre 167, Shree Prabhu, CIDCO, Aurangabad. PAN : ALNPS6479B . . . . . . . अपीऱधर्थी / Appellant बनाम / V/s. Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-2, Aurangabad. . . . . . . . प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent द्वारा / Appearances Assessee by : None for the assessee. Revenue by : Shri Sardar Singh Meena. स ु नवाईकीतारीख / Date of conclusive Hearing : 08/09/2022 घोषणाकीतारीख / Date of Pronouncement : 08/09/2022 आदेश / ORDER PER G. D. PADMAHSHALI, AM; The present appeal of the assessee is assailed against the order of Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-2, Aurangabad [for short “PCIT”] dt. 26/03/2018 passed u/s 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [for short “the Act”], which in turn ascended out of the order of the Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax Circle-2, Aurangabad [for short “AO”] dt. 01/03/2016 passed u/s 143(3), for assessment year [for short “AY”] 2013-14. Somnath Vaijanath Sakre ITA No. 1140/PUN/2018 AY: 2013-14 ITAT-Pune Page 2 of 3 2. On this date of ex-parte physical hearing, the learned departmental representative [for short “DR”] referring to the records entreated that, the appellant assessee filed an undated application seeking withdrawal of present appeal, citing that, the assessee has sought relief from first appellate authority against the consequential order of assessment passed by the Ld. AO. 3. In the light of aforementioned facts, the Ld DR submitted that, the present appeal of the appellant ceases to be prosecuted, ergo; recording his no objection in allowing the withdrawal, we order accordingly. 4. Resultantly, the appeal of the appellant assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. In terms of rule 34 of ITAT Rules, the order pronounced in the open court on this Thursday 08 th day of September, 2022. -S/d- -S/d- SS VISWANETHRA RAVI G. D. PADMAHSHALI JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER पुणे / PUNE ; दिन ांक / Dated : 08 th day of September, 2022. Somnath Vaijanath Sakre ITA No. 1140/PUN/2018 AY: 2013-14 ITAT-Pune Page 3 of 3 आदेश की प्रधिधलधप अग्रेधिि / Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1.अपील र्थी / The Appellant. 2. प्रत्यर्थी / The Respondent. 3. The Pr. CIT, Pune (Mh-India) 4. The Pr. CIT, Aurangabad (Mh-India) 5. दिभ गीय प्रदिदनदि,आयकरअपीलीय न्य य दिकरण, पुणे “बी” बेंच, पुणे / DR, ITAT, Pune “B” Bench, Pune. 6. ग र्डफ़ इल / Guard File. आिेश नुस र / BY RDER, िररष्ठ दनजी सदचि / Sr. Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय न्य य दिकरण, पुणे / ITAT, Pune.