INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, SIKAR V. SHRI SANJAY AGRAWAL, SIKAR

ITA 1155/JPR/2019

• Counselvise Citation: [2021] 109 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 1575 (ITAT-JAIPUR)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 4 month(s) 19 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 15-02-2021
• Appeal Filed By: Department
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Assessment Year: 2014-2015
• Appeal Filed On: 26-09-2019
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: ROONI PAULADDL
• Assessee Lawyers: P C PARWAL CA DHK

Judgement Text

VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES A, JAIPUR JH LANHI XLKA ] U;KF;D LNL; ,OA JH FOE FLAG ;KNO] YS[KK LNL; DS LE{K BEFORE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM VK;DJ VIHY LA -@ ITA NO. 1155/JP/2019 FU/KZKJ.K O'KZ@ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2014-15 I.T.O. WARD-1, SIKAR. CUKE VS. SHRI SANJAY AGARWAL, WARD NO. 4, PRATAP NAGAR, SIKAR. LFKK;H YS[KK LA -@THVKBZVKJ LA -@ PAN/GIR NO.: ABHPA 2983 Q VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT JKTLO DH VKSJ LS @ REVENUE BY: SMT. ROONI PAUL(ADDL.CIT) FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ LS @ ASSESSEE BY : SHRI P.C. PARWAL (CA) LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[K@ DATE OF HEARING : 03/02/2021 MN?KKS 'K.KK DH RKJH[K @ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 15/02/2021 VKNS'K@ ORDER PER: SANDEEP GOSAIN, J.M. THIS APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED BY THE REVENUE AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE LD. CIT(A)-IV, JAIPUR DATED 05/07/2019 FOR THE A.Y. 2014-15. 2. THE HEARING OF THE APPEAL WAS CONCLUDED THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE IN VIEW OF THE PREVAILING SITUATION OF COVID-19 PANDEMIC. 3. AT THE TIME OF HEARING OF THE APPEAL, THE A.R. OF THE ASSESSEE FURNISHED AN APPLICATION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE APPEAL. THE CONTENTION MADE IN THE SAID APPLICATION READS AS UNDER: WITH REFERENCE TO ABOVE, IT IS TO SUBMIT THAT THE ASSESSEE WANTS TO WITHDRAW THE ABOVE APPEAL SINCE HE HAS OPTED TO SETTLE THE DISPUTE UNDER VIVAD SE VISHWAS ACT, 2020 FOR WHICH ITA 1155/JP/2019_ SANJAY AGARWAL VS ITO 2 FORM NO. 3 HAS BEEN ISSUED BY THE PCIT, JAIPUR-2. COPY OF FORM NO. 3 IS ENCLOSED FOR READY REFERENCE. IT IS THEREFORE REQUESTED THAT THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE BE TREATED AS WITHDRAWN. THANKING YOU YOURS FAITHFULLY FOR KALANI & CO. CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS (P.C. PARWAL) A/R. 4. THE LD DR HAS RAISED NO OBJECTION IF THE APPEAL IS ALLOWED TO BE WITHDRAWN. 5. THEREFORE, IN VIEW OF THE FACT THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS ALREADY APPROACHED THE DEPARTMENT TO SETTLE THE MATTER UNDER VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME, WE PERMIT THE ASSESSEE TO WITHDRAW HIS APPEAL. ACCORDINGLY, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSES IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. 6. IN THE RESULT, THIS APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. AS WITHDRAWN. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 15 TH FEBRUARY, 2021. SD/- SD/- FOE FLAG ;KNO LANHI XLKA (VIKRAM SINGH YADAV) (SANDEEP GOSAIN) YS[KK LNL;@ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER U;KF;D LNL;@ JUDICIAL MEMBER TK;IQJ@ JAIPUR FNUKAD@ DATED:- 15/02/2021 ITA 1155/JP/2019_ SANJAY AGARWAL VS ITO 3 *RANJAN VKNS 'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSFKR @ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. VIHYKFKHZ @ THE APPELLANT- THE I.T.O., WARD-1, SIKAR. 2. IZR;FKHZ @ THE RESPONDENT- SHRI SANJAY AGARWAL, SIKAR. 3. VK;DJ VK;QDR @ CIT 4. VK;DJ VK;QDRVIHY @ THE CIT(A) 5. FOHKKXH; IZFRFUF/K] VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ @ DR, ITAT, JAIPUR 6. XKMZ QKBZY @ GUARD FILE (ITA NO. 1155/JP/2019) VKNS'KKUQLKJ @ BY ORDER, LGK;D IATHDKJ @ ASST. REGISTRAR