IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL B BENCH, CHENNAI BEFORE SHRI ABRAHAM P. GEORGE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI CHALLA NAGENDRA PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A. NOS. 116, 117 & 118/MDS/2012 (ASSESSMENT YEARS : 2001-02, 2003-04 & 2004-05) M/S INSTITUTE FOR SELF- MANAGEMENT, C/O SHRI T.N. SEETHARAMAN, ADVOCATE, # 384 (OLD NO.196), LLOYDS RD., CHENNAI - 600 086. PAN : AAATI4443H (APPELLANT) V. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD II(4), MADURAI. (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : SHRI R.K.V. SUNDAR, ADVOCATE RESPONDENT BY : SHRI MANJUNATH KAIKIHALLI , SR. AR DATE OF HEARING : 12.04.2012 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 12.04.2012 O R D E R PER ABRAHAM P. GEORGE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER : THESE APPEALS FILED BY THE ASSESSEE ARE DIRECTED AGAINST A COMMON ORDER DATED 28.11.2011 OF COMMISSIONER OF IN COME TAX (APPEALS)-I, MADURAI. I.T.A. NOS. 116 TO 118/MDS/12 2 2. WHEN THE APPEALS CAME UP BEFORE US, LEARNED COUN SEL FOR THE ASSESSEE SUBMITTED THAT HE WAS WITHDRAWING THESE AP PEALS UNDER INSTRUCTIONS FROM THE ASSESSEE. TO THIS EFFECT, HE FILED A PETITION WHEREIN IT HAS BEEN STATED THAT THE ASSESSEE WAS NO T INTERESTED IN PURSUING THE ABOVE APPEALS AND PROLONGING THE LITIG ATION, AND REQUESTED TO TREAT THE APPEALS AS NOT PRESSED. 3. LEARNED D.R. DID NOT HAVE ANY SERIOUS OBJECTION IN ASSESSEES WITHDRAWING THE APPEALS. HENCE, WE DISMISS THE APP EALS AS WITHDRAWN. 4. IN THE RESULT, ALL THE THREE APPEALS FILED BY TH E ASSESSEE ARE DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT AFTER CONCLUSION OF HEARING ON 12 TH APRIL, 2012. SD/- SD/- (CHALLA NAGENDRA PRASAD) (ABRAHAM P. GEORGE) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER CHENNAI, DATED THE 12 TH APRIL, 2012. KRI. COPY TO: APPELLANT/RESPONDENT/CIT(A)- I, MADURAI/ CIT-I, MADURAI/D.R./GUARD FILE