PARAMPARA BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS P LTD, MUMBAI V. ITO 9(2)(4), MUMBAI

ITA 1188/MUM/2011

• Counselvise Citation: 118819914 RSA 2011
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s) 7 month(s) 14 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 23-09-2013
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: C
• Next Hearing Date: 23-09-2013
• Assessment Year: 2002-2003
• Appeal Filed On: 09-02-2011
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: T R PAITE

Judgement Text

, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCHES C MUMBAI . . , / !' , # $ % BEFORE SHRI I.P. BANSAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER /AND SHRI N.K.BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER . / ITA NO. 1188/MUM/2011 ' ' ' ' / ASSESSMENT YEAR 2002-2003 PARAMPARA BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS P. LTD., 7C SENIOR ESTATE, PARSI PANCHAYAT ROAD, ANDHERI (EAST),MUMBAI 400069 / VS. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER 9(2)-4 AAYKAR BHAVAN, MK ROAD, MUMBAI 400020 ( # ./ )* ./ PAN/GIR NO. : AAACP 8317N ( (+ / APPELLANT ) .. ( ,-(+ / RESPONDENT ) APPELLANT BY NONE RESPONDENT BY : SHRI T.R. PAITE . /# / DATE OF HEARING : 23/09//2013 01' . /# / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 23/09/2013 2 / O R D E R PER I.P.BANSAL, JM: THIS APPEAL IS FILED BY THE ASSESSEE. IT IS DIRE CTED AGAINST THE ORDER PASSED BY LD. CIT(A)-20 MUMBAI DATED 3/12/2010 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2002- 03. 2. NOTICE OF HEARING WAS SENT TO THE ASSESSEE THROU GH RPAD ON THE ADDRESS GIVEN IN FORM NO.36. THE NOTICE ISSUED TO THE ASSE SSEE HAS BEEN RECEIVED BACK FROM THE POSTAL AUTHORITIES WITH THE REMARK LEFT. NO NEW ADDRESS HAS BEEN . / ITA NO. 1188/MUM/2011 ' ' ' ' / ASSESSMENT YEAR 2002-2003 2 PROVIDED AND NO APPLICATION FOR ADJOURNMENT HAS AL SO BEEN RECEIVED. THEREFORE, WE PRESUME THAT THE ASSESSEE IS N OT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THIS APPEAL. FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF THE TRIBU NAL REPORTED IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA (P) LTD.38 ITD 320 (DEL) A ND THE DECISION OF THE HONBLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF ES TATE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR VS. CWT, 223 ITR 480 (M.P) WE DISMISS THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IN LIMINE. 3. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. 3 /4 3/ . 5 #3) . )/ 6! % ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 23/09/2013 2 . 01' # 5 74 23 /09/2013 1 . 8 % SD/- SD/- ( !' / N.K.BILLAIYA ) ( . . / I.P. BANSAL ) # / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER / JUDICIAL MEMBER MUMBAI; 7 DATED 23 /09/2013 2 2 2 2 . .. . ,/9: ,/9: ,/9: ,/9: ;:'/ ;:'/ ;:'/ ;:'/ / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. (+ / THE APPELLANT 2. ,-(+ / THE RESPONDENT. 3. < ( ) / THE CIT(A)- 4. < / CIT 5. :=8 ,/ , , / DR, ITAT, MUMBAI 6. 8> ? / GUARD FILE. 2 2 2 2 / BY ORDER, -:/ ,/ //TRUE COPY// @ @@ @ / 6 6 6 6 ) ) ) ) (DY./ASSTT. REGISTRAR) , / ITAT, MUMBAI . . ./ VM , SR. PS