SHRI AMIT JINDAL ( HUF), JAIPUR V. ITO, WARD 1(2), JAIPUR

ITA 121/JPR/2020

• Counselvise Citation: [2020] 110 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 1621 (ITAT-JAIPUR)
• Duration Of Justice: 10 month(s) 11 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 09-12-2020
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: B
• Assessment Year: 2014-2015
• Appeal Filed On: 28-01-2020
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: ROONI PAUL DHK

Judgement Text

VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES B, JAIPUR JH LANHI XLKA ] U;KF;D LNL; ,OA JH FOE FLAG ;KNO] YS[KK LNL; DS LE{K BEFORE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM VK;DJ VIHY LA -@ ITA NO. 121/JP/2020 FU/KZKJ.K O'KZ@ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2014-15 AMIT JINDAL (HUF) H-23, CHITRANJAN MARG, C-SCHEME, JAIPUR CUKE VS. I.T.O., WARD-1(2), JAIPUR. LFKK;H YS[KK LA -@THVKBZVKJ LA -@ PAN/GIR NO.: AAJHA 8879 C VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ LS @ ASSESSEE BY : SHRI GULSHAN AGARWAL (CA) JKTLO DH VKSJ LS @ REVENUE BY: SMT. ROONI PAUL (ADDL.CIT-DR) LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[K@ DATE OF HEARING : 08/12/2020 MN?KKS 'K.KK DH RKJH[K @ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 09/12/2020 VKNS'K@ ORDER PER: SANDEEP GOSAIN, J.M. THIS APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE LD. CIT(A)-I, JAIPUR DATED 07/01/2020 FOR THE A.Y. 2014-15. 2. THE HEARING OF THE APPEAL WAS CONCLUDED THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE IN VIEW OF THE PREVAILING SITUATION OF COVID-19 PANDEMIC. 3. THE LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE FURNISHED APPLICATION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THIS APPEAL. THE CONTENTION IN THE SAID APPLICATION READS AS UNDER: 1. THE ABOVE CASE IS FIXED FOR HEARING ON 08/12/2020. ITA 121/JP/2020_ AMIT JINDAL (HUF) VS ITO 2 2. THE ASSESSEE HAS OPTED FOR VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME AND FORM NO. 3 HAS BEEN ISSUED BY PCIT ON DATED 16/10/2020 (COPY ATTACHED). THE ASSESSEE VIDE LETTER DATED 21/10/2020 (COPY ATTACHED) HAS REQUESTED TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL. THEREFORE, YOUR HONOUR IS REQUESTED KINDLY TO ALLOW THE ASSESSEE TO WITHDRAWAL TO APPEAL. WE SHALL BE HIGHLY OBLIGED FOR YOUR KINDNESS. THANKING YOU AND REMAIN YOURS FAITHFULLY (GULSHAN AGARWAL) FCA/AR 4. THE LD DR HAS RAISED NO OBJECTION IF THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS ALLOWED TO BE WITHDRAWN. 5. THEREFORE, IN VIEW OF THE FACT THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS ALREADY APPROACHED THE DEPARTMENT TO SETTLE THE MATTER UNDER VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME, WE PERMIT THE ASSESSEE TO WITHDRAW HIS APPEAL. ACCORDINGLY, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSES IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. 6. IN THE RESULT, THIS APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 09 TH DECEMBER, 2020. SD/- SD/- FOE FLAG ;KNO LANHI XLKA (VIKRAM SINGH YADAV) (SANDEEP GOSAIN) YS[KK LNL;@ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER U;KF;D LNL;@ JUDICIAL MEMBER TK;IQJ@ JAIPUR FNUKAD@ DATED:- 09/12/2020 *RANJAN ITA 121/JP/2020_ AMIT JINDAL (HUF) VS ITO 3 VKNS 'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSFKR @ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. VIHYKFKHZ @ THE APPELLANT- SHRI AMIT JINDAL (HUF), JAIPUR. 2. IZR;FKHZ @ THE RESPONDENT- THE ITO, WARD-1(2), JAIPUR. 3. VK;DJ VK;QDR @ CIT 4. VK;DJ VK;QDRVIHY @ THE CIT(A) 5. FOHKKXH; IZFRFUF/K] VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ @ DR, ITAT, JAIPUR 6. XKMZ QKBZY @ GUARD FILE (ITA NO. 121/JP/2020) VKNS'KKUQLKJ @ BY ORDER, LGK;D IATHDKJ @ ASST. REGISTRAR