ZUBIN ZAINUDDIN, MUMBAI V. ACIT 21 (3), MUMBAI

ITA 1243/MUM/2019

• Counselvise Citation: [2022] 105 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 4453 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 year(s) 1 month(s) 14 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 17-04-2022
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: G
• Assessment Year: 2013-2014
• Appeal Filed On: 04-03-2019
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Assessee Lawyers: SHREYANS CHAUVAN
• Section: 143(3)

Judgement Text

ITA Nos. 1243/Mum/2019 A.Y. 2013-14 Zubin Zainuddin Vs. ACIT -21(3) 1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “G” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 1243/Mum/2019 (A.Y. 2013-14) Zubin Zainuddin 3101 & 3102, Raheja Atlantis, Ganpatrao Kadam Marg, Lower Parel (W) Mumbai – 400 013 Vs. ACIT-21(3) Piramal Chamber, Mumbai लेख सं./ज आइआर सं./PAN/GIR No: AADPZ1110B Appellant .. Respondent Appellant by : Shri Shreyans Chauvan Respondent by : Shri Hoshang B. Irani Date of Hearing 18.04.2022 Date of Pronouncement 18.04.2022 आदेश / O R D E R PER AMARJIT SINGH, AM: The present appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the CIT(A)-48, Mumbai, which in turn arises from the order passed by the A.O. u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for A.Y. 2013-14. 2. At the time of hearing the ld. counsel of the assessee submitted that the assessee has opted this appeal for Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 in order to settle the aforesaid matter pending before the Tribunal. It is ITA Nos. 1243/Mum/2019 A.Y. 2013-14 Zubin Zainuddin Vs. ACIT -21(3) 2 stated by the assessee that in the backdrop of the aforesaid facts the captioned appeal may be allowed to be withdrawn. 3. The ld. D.R did not controvert the aforesaid factual position as had been stated before us. 4. In view of the above, we dismiss the appeal as withdrawn, subject to a rider that in the unlikely event of the matter not being resolved under the Vivad se Vishwas scheme the assessee shall have liberty to approach the Tribunal for restoration of his appeal within the time limit provided in the Act. 5. Resultantly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn subject to the observation recorded hereinabove. Order pronounced in the open court on 18/04/2022. Sd/- Sd/- (Vikas Awasthy) (Amarjit Singh) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Mumbai; Dated: 18.04.2022 PS: Rohit Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. The Appellant 2. The Respondent. 3. The CIT(A)- 4. CIT 5. DR, ITAT, Mumbai 6. Guard file. BY ORDER, //True Copy// (Sr. Private Secretary) ITAT, Mumbai