IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCH B , HYDERABAD (THROUGH VIRTUAL HEARING) BEFORE SMT. P. MADHAVI DEVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO. 1258/HYD/2018 A.Y. 2009 - 10 BANDREDDY VENKATESWARA RAO, HYDERABAD. PAN: ADHPB 1773 H VS. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 14(1), HYDERABAD. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY: SHRI S. RAMA RAO REVENUE BY: SHRI ROHIT MUJUMDAR, DR DATE OF HEARING: 21/04/2021 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 26 /04/2021 ORDER PER A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY, A.M: THIS APPEAL IS FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE LD. CIT(A) - 6, HYDERABAD IN APPEAL NO.0278/2016 - 17/A3 CIT(A) - 6, DATED 16/03/2018 PASSED U/S. 143(3) R.W.S 147 AND U/S. 250(6) OF THE ACT FOR THE A.Y. 2009 - 10. 2. AT THE OUTSET, LD. AR SUBMITTED BEFORE US THAT THE ASSESSEE DESIRES TO AVAIL VIVAD SE VISWAS SCHEME. HE FURTHER SUBMITTED THAT THE ASSESSEE COULD NOT FILE FORM NO.1 & 2 DUE TO PAUCITY OF TIME, HOWEVER HE ASSURE D THE BENCH THAT THE FORM NO.1&2 SHALL BE FILED SHORTLY. 3. THE LD. DR SUBMITTED THAT IF THE ASSESSEE DESIRES TO AVAIL THE VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME THE REVENUE HAS NO OBJECTION. 4. HAVING HEARD BOTH THE PARTIES THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE, WE ARE INCLINED T O TREAT THE INSTANT APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE AS WITHDRAWN RELYING ON THE DECISION OF THE HONBLE HIGH COURT OF MADRAS IN THE CASE OF DCIT VS. M/S. KEYARAM HOTELS P. LTD IN T.C.A. NO. 694 OF 2019, DATED 13/10/2020 WHEREIN IT WAS HELD AS UNDER: - 3. THE LEARN ED COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT / ASSESSEE, ON INSTRUCTIONS, SUBMITTED THAT THE RESPONDENT / ASSESSEE INTENDS TO AVAIL THE BENEFIT OF VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME (VVS SCHEME FOR BREVITY) AND IN THIS REGARD, THE ASSESSEE IS TAKING STEPS TO FILE THE APPLICATION / DECLARATION IN FORM NO.1. . .. 7. AS OBSERVED, THE ASSESSEE IS GIVEN LIBERTY TO RESTORE THIS APPEAL IN THE EVENT THE ULTIMATE DECISION TO BE TAKEN ON THE DECLARATION TO BE FILED BY THE ASSESSEE UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE SAID ACT IS NOT IN FAVOUR OF THE ASSESSEE. IF SUCH A PRAYER IS MADE, THE REGISTRY SHALL ENTERTAIN THE PRAYER WITHOUT INSISTING UPON ANY APPLICATION TO BE FILED FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN RESTORATION OF THE APPEAL AND ON SUCH REQUEST MADE BY THE ASSESSEE BY FILING A MISCELLANEOUS PETITIO N FOR RESTORATION, THE REGISTRY SHALL PLACE SUCH PETITION BEFORE THE DIVISION BENCH FOR ORDERS. 8. IN THE LIGHT OF THE ABOVE, WE DIRECT THE RESPONDENT / ASSESSEE TO FILE FORM NO.1 ON OR BEFORE 09/11/2020 AND THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY HTTP://WWW.JUDIS.NIC.IN5/6 T.C.A.NO.694 OF 2019. ACCORDINGLY, WE HEREBY DISMISS THE INSTANT APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE FOR THE A.Y. 200 9 - 10 AS WITHDRAWN. HOWEVER, WE ALSO MAKE IT CLEAR THAT, IF THE ASSESSEES CASE IS NOT ACCEPTED IN THE VIVAD - SE - VISHWAS SCHEME BY THE REVENUE FOR WHATSOEVER MAY BE REASON ON A SUBSEQUENT DATE, THEN THE ASSESSEE SHALL BE AT LIBERTY TO FILE MISCELLANEOUS PETITION BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL WITHIN THE TIME LIMIT PRESCRIBED UNDER THE ACT TO REINSTA TE ITS APPEAL. IT IS ORDERED ACCORDINGLY. 5. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON THE 26 TH APRIL, 2021. SD/ - SD/ - (P. MADHAVI DEVI) ( A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY ) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER HYDERABAD, DATED: 26 TH APRIL, 2021. OKK COPY TO: - 1) BANDREDDI VENKATESWARA RAO M/S. N. KOTESWARA RAO & CO., CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS, D.NO. 23 - 6 - 17/2, PATNAM BAZAR, GUNTUR. 2) INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 14(1), HYDERABAD. 3) THE CIT (A) - 6, HYDERABAD. 4) THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 6, HYDERABAD. 5) THE DR, ITAT, HYDERABAD 6) GUARD FILE