Gaddam Venkata Satish Kumar , Hyderabad V. Income Tax Officer, Ward-17(2), Hyderabad

ITA 1260/Hyd/2018

• Counselvise Citation: [2021] 107 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 8085 (ITAT-HYDERABAD)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 year(s) 2 month(s) 22 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 03-09-2021
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: DB-B
• Next Hearing Date: 02-09-2021
• Assessment Year: 2011-2012
• Appeal Filed On: 12-06-2018
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Assessee Lawyers: P MURALI MOHANA RAO

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCHES B : HYDERABAD BEFORE SHRI S.S.GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO. A.Y. APPELLANT RESPONDENT 1260/HYD/18 2011-12 GADDAM VENKATA SATISH KUMAR, HYDERABAD [PAN: BANPS6839M] INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-17(2), HYDERABAD 1261/HYD/18 2011-12 GHANTA KALYAN KUMAR, HYDERABAD [PAN: AJMPG9261C] 1262/HYD/18 2012-13 FOR ASSESSEE : SHRI P.MURALI MOHANA RAO, AR FOR REVENUE : SHRI ROHIT MUJUMDAR, DR DATE OF HEARING : 02-09-2021 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 03-09-2021 O R D E R PER S.S.GODARA, J.M. : THESE TWIN ASSESSEES APPEALS ARISE FROM THE CIT(A)- 5, HYDERABADS ORDER(S) DATED 15-05-2018 PASSED IN CASE NOS.0165, 0169 & 0170/2017-18/CIT(A)-5, IN PROCEEDI NGS U/S.179(1) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 [IN SHORT, THE ACT]; RESPECTIVELY. 2. IT TRANSPIRES AT THE OUTSET THAT THESE ASSESSEES HAVE FI LED THEIR RESPECTIVE LETTER(S) DT.31-05-2021 TO THE FOLLOWIN G EFFECT: ITA NOS. 1260, 1261 & 1262/HYD/2018 :- 2 -: THE ASSESSEE APPEAL IN ITA NO.1260/HYD/2018 IN REL ATION FOR THE AY.2011-12 HAS BEEN POSTED FOR HEARING ON 31.05.201 BEFORE THE HON'BLE B BENCH, HYDERABAD. IN THIS CONNECTION, WE WOULD LIKE TO WITHDRAW THE P RESENT APPEAL DUE TO THE FACT THAT THE ORIGINAL ASSESSMENT ORDER WHIC H IS HAVING THE EFFECT ON THE PRESENT ORDER AGAINST WHICH PRESENT A PPEAL IS PREFERRED IS GIVEN IN THE FAVOUR OF THE ASSESSEE. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE, WE MAY BE PERMITTED TO WITHDR AW THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE. INCONVENIENCE CAUSE IN THIS REGARD IS HIGHLY REGRET TED. 3. LEARNED DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE DOES NOT RAISE AN Y OBJECTION TO THE ABOVE WITHDRAWAL PRAYER. 4. THESE ASSESSEES APPEALS ARE DISMISSED AS WITHDRA WN IN ABOVE TERMS. A COPY OF THIS COMMON ORDER BE PLACED IN THE RESPECTIVE CASE FILES. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 3 RD SEPTEMBER, 2021 SD/- SD/- (LAXMI PRASAD SAHU) (S.S.G ODARA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEM BER HYDERABAD, DATED: 03-09-2021 TNMM ITA NOS. 1260, 1261 & 1262/HYD/2018 :- 3 -: COPY TO : 1.GADDAM VENKATA SATISH KUMAR, C/O. P.MURALI & CO., CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS, 6-3-655/2/3, 1 ST FLOOR, SOMAJIGUDA, HYDERABAD. 2.GHANTA KALYAN KUMAR, C/O. P.MURALI & CO., CHARTER ED ACCOUNTANTS, 6-3-655/2/3, 1 ST FLOOR, SOMAJIGUDA, HYDERABAD. 3.THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-17(2), HYDERABAD. 4.THE CIT(APPEALS)-5, HYDERABAD. 5.THE PR.CIT-5, HYDERABAD. 6.D.R. ITAT, HYDERABAD. 7.GUARD FILE.