0IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH : F : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI R.K. PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND MS SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO.1266/DEL/2016 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2006-07 SANDEEP CHONA, 9/54, BASEMENT VIKRAM VIHAR, LAJPAT NAGAR IV, NEW DELHI. PAN: AEVPC3102N VS. ITO, WARD-33(4), NEW DELHI. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : NONE REVENUE BY : SHRI SURENDER PAL, SR. DR DATE OF HEARING : 05.02.2019 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 05.02.2019 ORDER PER R.K. PANDA, AM: THIS APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 29 TH OCTOBER, 2015 OF THE CIT(A)-17, NEW DELHI, RELATING TO ASSES SMENT YEAR 2006-07. 2. DESPITE SERVICE OF NOTICE, NONE APPEARED ON BEHA LF OF THE ASSESSEE. NO PETITION SEEKING ADJOURNMENT OF THE CASE WAS FILED. THIS TY PE OF CONDUCT ON THE PART OF THE ASSESSEE SHOWS THAT HE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECU TING THE APPEAL FIELD BY HIM. ITA NO.1266/DEL/2016 2 THEREFORE, FOLLOWING THE DECISIONS MENTIONED BELOW, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION:- 1. CIT VS. B.N. BHATTACHARGEE & ANR., 118 ITR 461. 2. ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR VS. CWT, 223 ITR 4 80 (M.P.). 3. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA (P.) LTD, 38 ITD 320 (DEL.). 3. HOWEVER, IF THE ASSESSEE, THROUGH PROPER APPLICATIO N, EXPLAINS THE REASONS FOR SUCH NON-APPEARANCE, THE TRIBUNAL MAY, AT ITS DISCR ETION, RECALL THIS ORDER. 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASS ESSEE IS DISMISSED IN LIMINE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. THE DECISION WAS PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT AT T HE TIME OF HEARING ITSELF I.E., ON 05.02.2019. SD/- SD/- (SUCHITRA KAMBLE) (R.K. PANDA) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMFBER DATED: 05 TH FEBRUARY, 2019 DK COPY FORWARDED TO 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR ASSTT. REGISTRAR, ITAT, NEW DELHI