Kasturilal Sardarilal Luthra, Nashik V. DCIT, Nashik

ITA 1295/PUN/2012

• Counselvise Citation: [2016] 132 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 1555 (ITAT-PUNE)
• Duration Of Justice: 4 year(s) 1 month(s) 9 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 25-07-2016
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Next Hearing Date: 25-07-2016
• Assessment Year: 2003-2004
• Appeal Filed On: 15-06-2012
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: J P CHANDRAKAR
• Section: 143(3); 153A

Judgement Text

] ]] ] IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCH B, PUNE , !', $ % BEFORE SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JM AND SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA, AM ITA NO.1295/PN/2012 ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2003-04 KASTURILAL SARDARILAL LUTHRA, URMIL, SHIRIN MEDOWES, NASHIK. PAN : AAFPK4629P . APPELLANT VS. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 1, NASHIK. . RESPONDENT ITA NO.1032/PN/2013 ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2003-04 KASTURILAL SARDARILAL LUTHRA, URMIL, SHIRIN MEDOWES, NASHIK. PAN : AAFPK4629P . APPELLANT VS. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 1, NASHIK. . RESPONDENT / APPELLANT BY : SHRI M. K. KULKARNI / RESPONDENT BY : SHRI J. P. CHANDRAKAR (CIT) / DATE OF HEARING : 25.07.2016 / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 25.07.2016 & / ORDER PER PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA, AM : BOTH THE CAPTIONED APPEALS PREFERRED BY THE SAME AS SESSEE ARE AGAINST THE CONSOLIDATED ORDERS OF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME T AX (APPEALS)-II, NASHIK DATED 24.05.2011 RELATING TO SAME ASSESSMENT YEAR I .E. A.Y. 2003-04 PASSED 2 ITA NO.1295/PN/2012 ITA NO.1032/PN/2013 UNDER SECTION 153A R.W.S. 143(3) OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961 (IN SHORT THE ACT). 2. AT THE TIME OF HEARING OF THE APPEALS, THE LD. A UTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ASSESSEE SUBMITTED THAT THE ASSESSEE INTEND S TO PURSUE ANOTHER APPEAL IN ITA NO.923/PN/2011 RELATING TO ASSESSMENT YEAR 2003 -04 AND SOUGHT PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE CAPTIONED APPEALS. FOR THIS PURPOSE, HE MOVED A WRITTEN REQUEST DATED 25.07.2016 SEEKING PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW BOTH THE CAPTIONED APPEALS. THE LD. DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTA TIVE DID NOT RAISE ANY OBJECTION ON BEHALF OF REVENUE. ACCORDINGLY, WE AR E GRANTING THE PRAYER OF THE ASSESSEE. THUS, WE DISMISS BOTH THE CAPTIONED A PPEALS OF THE ASSESSEE AS HAVING BEEN WITHDRAWN. 3. IN THE RESULT, BOTH THE CAPTIONED APPEALS OF THE ASSESSEE ARE DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON THIS 25 TH DAY OF JULY, 2016. SD/- SD/- ( VIKAS AWASTHY ) ( PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA ) / JUDICIAL MEMBER $ / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER PUNE ; DATED : 25 TH JULY, 2016. & ' () *+( / COPY OF THE ORDER IS FORWARDED TO : 1) THE ASSESSEE; 2) THE DEPARTMENT; 3) THE CIT(A)-II, NASHIK; 4) THE ADDL. CIT, CENTRAL RANGE, NASHIK; 5) THE DR B BENCH, I.T.A.T., PUNE; 6) GUARD FILE. &, / BY ORDER , ' # //TRUE COPY// $ %& # '( / SR. PRIVATE SECRETARY ) '* , / ITAT, PUNE