IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD B BENCH, HYDERABAD BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO.1296/HYD/2012 PADMAVATHAMMA PRERANA FOUNDATION, KONDAPUR, RR DISTRICT. PAN:AAB TP 9782D VS THE DIRECTOR OF INCOME- TAX (EXEMPTINS) HYDERABAD {APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY : SMT. VIDISHA KALRA DATE OF HEARING : 03-12-2012 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 03-12-2012. ORDER PER SAKTIJIT DEY,JUDICIAL MEMBER. THIS APPEAL PREFERRED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER PASSED BY THE DIT (EXEMPTIONS), HYDERABAD DATED 27-06-2012. 2. THE CASE WAS FIXED FOR HEARING TO-DAY I.E. ON 3-12- 2012. DESPITE NOTICE, NEITHER ANYBODY APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE NOR ANY APPLICATION FOR ADJOURNMEN T WAS FILED. HENCE, WE ARE OF THE OPINION THAT THE ASSES SEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THE APPEAL. AS HELD BY T HE HONBLE ITAT, DELHI BENCH IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MU LTIPLAN INDIA LIMITED (38 ITD 320), THERE MAY BE VARIOUS RE ASONS FOR THE ASSESSEE TO REMAIN ABSENT AT THE TIME OF HE ARING. ONE OF THE REASONS MIGHT BE A DESIGN OR ABSENCE OF NEED TO PROSECUTE THE APPEAL. BY FOLLOWING THE SAID DECISI ON AND 2 CONSIDERING THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE PRES ENT CASE, WE DISMISS THE APPEAL IN LIMINE. 3. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE STANDS DISMISSED. ORDER WAS PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 03-12-20 12. SD- (CHANDRA POOJARI) SD/- (SAKTIJIT DEY) ACCOUNTANT M EMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED THE 3 RD DECEMBER, 2012. COPY FORWARDED TO: 1. PADMA ATHAMMA PRERANA FOUNDATION 54, CYBER MEADOWS SOCIETY, CHIRAC PUBLIC SCHOOL ROAD, KONDAPUR,RR DISTRICT. 2. DIRECTOR OF INCOME-TAX J(EXEMPTIONS), HYDERABAD. 3. THE DR, ITAT, HYDERABAD JMR*