M/s Shishu Niketan Panchkula Education Society, Panchkula V. CIT, Panchkula

ITA 1310/CHANDI/2012

• Counselvise Citation: [2013] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 68465 (ITAT-CHANDIGARH)
• Duration Of Justice: 8 month(s) 19 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 06-09-2013
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Next Hearing Date: 12-06-2013
• Assessment Year: misc
• Appeal Filed On: 17-12-2012
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: JYOTI KUMARI
• Keywords: Charitable institution; Opportunity of being heard; Benefit of exemption
• Section: 80G; 12A; 12AA; 12; 11

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CHANDIGARH BENCH A, CHANDIGARH BEFORE SHRI T.R.SOOD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND MS. SUSHMA CHOWLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO.1310 /CHD/2012 (UNDER SECTION 12AA) SHISHU NIKETAN PANCHKULA VS. THE C.I.T., EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, PANCHKULA. SHISHU NIEKTAN PUBLIC SCHOOL, SECTOR 5, MDC, PANCHKULA. PAN: AALTS5162N (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : SHRI TEJ MOHAN SINGH RESPONDENT BY : SMT.JYOTI KUMARI DATE OF HEARING : 29.08.2013 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 06.09.2013 O R D E R PER SUSHMA CHOWLA, J.M. : THE APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE IS AGAINST THE ORDE R OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, PANCHKULA DATED 31.10.2 012 AGAINST THE ORDER PASSED UNDER SECTION 12AA(B) OF THE INCOME TA X ACT, 1961 (IN SHORT THE ACT). 2. THE GROUNDS OF APPEAL RAISED BY THE ASSESSEE RE AD AS UNDER: 1. THAT THE LD. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX HAS ERR ED IN LAW AS WELL AS ON FACTS IN REJECTING REGISTRATION UNDER SE CTION 12AA OF THE ACT WHICH IS ARBITRARY & UNJUSTIFIED. 2. THAT THE LD. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX HAS ERRE D IN OBSERVING THAT THE ASSESSEE SOCIETY HAS NOT CARRIED OUT ANY ACTIVITY AS PER THE OBJECTS WHICH IS UNFOUNDED, WIT HOUT ANY BASIS AND AS SUCH THE ORDER IS ARBITRARY AND UNJUST IFIED. 2 3. THAT THE REGISTRATION HAS BEEN REFUSED ONLY ON T HE BASIS OF SUSPICION, CONJECTURES AND SURMISES WHICH IS NOT PE RMITTED UNDER THE LAW AND AS SUCH THE ORDER REFUSING REGIST RATION IS ILLEGAL, ARBITRARY AND UNJUSTIFIED. 3. THE LEARNED D.R. FOR THE REVENUE POINTED OUT THA T THE ISSUE IN THE PRESENT APPEAL IS IDENTICAL TO THE ISSUE RAISED BEF ORE THE TRIBUNAL IN ITA NO.1339/CHD/2012 IN THE CASE OF SUCHINTA EDUCATIONA L SOCIETY VS. CIT, WHEREIN VIDE ORDER DATED 24.5.2013. THE ORDER OF T HE COMMISSIONER IN REFUSING TO GRANT REGISTRATION TO THE ASSESSEE UNDE R SECTION 12AA OF THE ACT WAS UPHELD. 4. THE LEARNED A.R. FOR THE ASSESSEE FAIRLY ADMITTE D THAT THE AIMS AND OBJECTS OF THE ASSESSEE SOCIETY WERE IDENTICAL TO T HE AIMS OBJECTS IN SUCHINTA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY VS. CIT (SUPRA) AND TH E PRESENT ASSESSEE SOCIETY WAS ALSO GOVERNED BY THE SAME FAMILY MEMBER S OF THE SAID SOCIETY. THE LEARNED A.R. FOR THE ASSESSEE, HOWEVE R, POINTED OUT THAT THE ASSESSEE FOR THE YEAR ENDING 31.3.2012 HAD CARRIED ON CERTAIN CHARITABLE ACTIVITIES AND HAD FILED THE INCOME TAX RETURN FOR THE YEAR UNDER CONSIDERATION THOUGH AFTER THE PASSING OF THE ORDER BY THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX UNDER SECTION 12AA OF THE ACT REFUSIN G TO GRANT REGISTRATION TO THE ASSESSEE SOCIETY. 5. WE HAVE HEARD THE RIVAL CONTENTIONS AND PERUSED THE RECORD. THE ASSESSEE SOCIETY WAS REGISTERED WITH THE REGISTRAR OF SOCIETY, PANCHKULA ON 14.3.2012. THE APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 12A OF THE ACT IN FORM NO.10A WAS FILED BY THE ASSESSEE ON 24.4.2012. TH E AIMS AND OBJECTS OF THE SOCIETY AS PER MEMORANDUM OF ASSOCIATION ARE AS UNDER: 1. TO PROVIDE ADVANCEMENT, RESEARCH AND DISSEMINATION OF EDUCATION, LITERACY, SCIENTIFIC AND SCHOLASTIC AND OPENING AND TO START, ESTABLISH, RUN, TAKE OVER OR MANAGE AND MAINTAIN SCHOOLS WITH AND OBJECT TO PROVE EDUCATION OF ALL TYPE OF STUDENTS. THE SOCIETY SHALL ALSO PROVIDE EDUCATION TO STUDENTS FOR VARIOUS EXAMINATION 3 CONDUCTED BY DIFFERENT INDIAN/FOREIGN UNIVERSITIES OR BOARDS ETC. 2. THE SOCIETY SHALL ESTABLISH, MAINTAIN CONTROL BALWARIES, HOLIDAY HOMES, OPEN AIR SCHOOL AND BAL MANDIRS ETC. 3. TO RECEIVE DONATIONS IN MOVABLE/IMMOVABLE PROPERTIES. 4. THE SOCIETY SHALL GIVE LOAN, SCHOLARSHIP AND OTH ER TYPE OF MONETARY ASSISTANCE TO DESERVING STUDENTS. 6. THE ASSESSEE SOCIETY WAS OPERATING FROM THE PREM ISES OF SHISHU NIKETAN MODEL SCHOOL, SECTOR 5, MDC, PANCHKULA, WHI CH ADMITTEDLY IS RECOGNIZED SOCIETY AND IS RUNNING A SCHOOL AND IS R EGISTERED UNDER SECTION 12A OF THE ACT. THE PRESENT SOCIETY PROPOS ED TO TAKE OVER THE EXISTING SCHOOL BEING RUN IN THE NAME AND STYLE OF SHISHU NIKETAN MODEL SCHOOL, SECTOR 5, MDC, PANCHKULA ON LEASE BASIS FRO M THE SOCIETY WHICH WAS RUNNING THE SAID SCHOOL. THE ASSESSEE SOCIETY WAS FORMED ON 14.3.2012 AND AS PER THE REPORT OF THE ASSESSING OF FICER AS WELL AS THE ADDL.CIT, PANCHKULA RANGE DATED 18.7.2012 AND 25.7. 2012, IT WAS REPORTED THAT NO RETURN OF INCOME, BALANCE SHEET AN D INCOME AND EXPENDITURE ACCOUNT WAS FILED AND HENCE RECOMMENDAT ION FOR NON REGISTRATION UNDER SECTION 12A OF THE ACT. 7. BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DURING THE COURSE OF PROCEEDINGS RELATING TO REGISTRATION UNDER SECTION 12A OF THE ACT, IT WAS STATED THAT THE SOCIETY PROPOSED TO TAKE ON LEASE T HE MANAGEMENT OF THE EXISTING SCHOOL AT PANCHKULA. HOWEVER, NO ARRANGEM ENT HAD BEEN FORMALIZED BETWEEN THE TWO SOCIETIES. THE COMMISS IONER OF INCOME TAX NOTED THAT AS PER THE BALANCE SHEET AND PROFIT & LO SS ACCOUNT AS ON 31.3.2012, THE CORPUS FUND OF RS.5000/- WAS SHOWN I N THE BALANCE SHEET AND THERE WERE NO RECEIPTS BUT AN EXPENDITURE OF RS .1760/- WAS DEBITED TO THE INCOME AND EXPENDITURE ACCOUNT. THE COMMISS IONER OF INCOME TAX IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE SAID DETAILS POINTED OUT T HAT THE SOCIETY HAD NOT 4 CARRIED OUT ANY ACTIVITIES AS PER ITS OBJECTS AND T HE CLAIM FOR HOLDING EVENING CLASSES BEING UNSUBSTANTIATED, OBSERVED THA T IT WAS IMPOSSIBLE TO VERIFY THE GENUINENESS OF THE ACTIVITIES OF THE SOC IETY AND HENCE HELD THAT THE ASSESSEE SOCIETY WAS NOT ELIGIBLE AT THIS STAGE FOR GRANT OF REGISTRATION UNDER SECTION 12AA OF THE ACT AND THE SAME WAS REJECTED. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, HOWEVER, OBSERVED T HAT THE SOCIETY MAY APPLY AGAIN AFTER CARRYING OUT CHARITABLE ACTIV ITIES TO MEET OUT ITS OBJECTIVES. 8. WE FIND THAT IDENTICAL ISSUE AS ARISING BEFORE U S WAS RAISED IN THE CASE OF SUCHINTA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY VS. CIT (SUPRA ) WHICH ADMITTEDLY WAS ALSO BEING RUN BY THE FAMILY MEMBERS WHO ARE AL SO RUNNING THE PRESENT ASSESSEE SOCIETY. THE FACTS OF THE PRESENT CASE ARE IDIENTICAL TO THE FACTS BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL IN SUCHINTA EDUCATION AL SOCIETY (SUPRA) WHEREIN ON CONSIDERATION OF THE FACTS IT WAS HELD A S UNDER: 6. WE HAVE HEARD THE RIVAL CONTENTIONS AND PERUSED THE RECORD. THE ASSESSEE SOCIETY CAME INTO EXISTENCE W.E.F. 13.11.2 012 AND IS REGISTERED AS SOCIETY UNDER THE SOCIETIES REGISTRATION ACT. T HE CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRATION OF SOCIETIES IS ENCLOSED AT PAGE 6 OF THE PAPER BOOK. THE ASSESSEE AT PAGES 7 TO 8 OF THE PAPER BOOK HAS PLAC ED ON RECORD THE MEMORANDUM OF ASSOCIATION OF THE ASSESSEE SOCIETY. AS PER CLAUSE 4(I) AND (II), THE AIMS AND OBJECTS OF THE ASSESSEE SOCI ETY ARE AS UNDER: I) TO PROVIDE ADVANCEMENT, RESEARCH AND DISSEMINATION OF EDUCATION-LITERACY, SCIENTIFIC AND SCHOLASTIC AND OPENING AND TO START, ESTABLISH, RUN, TAKEOVER OR MANAGE AND MAINTAIN SCHOOLS WITH AN OBJECT TO PROVIDE SOUND PRE-PRIMARY, PRIMARY, MIDDLE, SECONDARY AND HIGHER EDUCATION INCLUDING RUNNING OF ENGINEERING AND MEDICAL COLLEGES, POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTES AND VARIOUS VOCATIONAL COURSES TO CHILDREN SEEKING RECOGNITION. THE SOCIETY SHALL PROVIDE EDUCATION TO THE STUDENTS FOR THE VARIOUS EXAMINATIONS CONDUCTED BY DIFFERENT INDIAN/FOREIGN UNIVERSITIES, BOARDS AND INSTITUTIONS ETC. II) TO AFFILIATE, GET RECOGNITION OF THE SCHOOLS AN D COLLEGES MAINTAINED BY THE SOCIETY TO THE UNIVERSITIES, EDUCATION BOARDS AND OTHER AUTHORITIES AND TO OBSERVE THE RULES AND REGULATIONS PRESCRIBED BY THEM OR CONTAINED IN 5 THE EDUCATION CODE, ETC. AND TO RECEIVE GRANTS-IN- AID. 7. THE ASSESSEE MOVED AN APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATI ON UNDER SECTION 12A OF THE ACT IN FORM NO.10A. THE COPY OF THE SAI D APPLICATION IS PLACED AT PAGE 2 OF THE PAPER BOOK. ALONGWITH THE SAID APPLICATION THE ASSESSEE ENCLOSED THE COPY OF THE INSTRUMENT UNDER WHICH THE SAID TRUST WAS CREATED AND ALSO COPY OF ACCOUNTS OF THE BANK S TATEMENT OF ASSESSEE SOCIETY FOR ONE YEAR. THE PERUSAL OF THE BANK STAT EMENT PLACED AT PAGES 3 AND 4 OF THE PAPER BOOK REFLECTS THAT THE ASSESSE E HAD MADE A CASH DEPOSIT OF RS.5000/- IN THE SAID BANK STATEMENT ON 23.4.2012. THE ASSESSEE DURING THE COURSE OF THE PROCEEDINGS IN RE LATION TO GRANT OF REGISTRATION UNDER SECTION 12A OF THE ACT FURNISHED A NOTE OF ACTIVITIES WHICH IS PLACED AT PAGE 20 OF THE PAPER BOOK WHICH READS AS UNDER: NOTE ON ACTIVITY SUCHINTA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY WAS REGISTERED AS SOCI ETY UNDER SOCIETY REGISTRATION ACT ON 13 APRIL 2012 FOR IMPARTING EDU CATIONAL TO ALL AS MENTIONED IN MEMORANDUM AND ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION . SHISHU NIKETAN MODEL SCHOOL EXISTING SOCIETY IS ALREADY REGISTERED UNDER SECTION 12 A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT SINCE 1968.IT HAS ONE OF THE BRA NCHES IN SECTOR 43, CHANDIGARH .THE NEW SOCIETY PROPOSES TO TAKE THE EX ISTING THE SCHOOL ON LEASE TO BE RUN BY THE NEW SOCIETY. SINCE THE OLD S OCIETY IS RUNNING FOUR SCHOOLS, TWO IN CHANDIGARH, MOHALI AND PANCHKULA TO EASE THE PRESSURE AND TO MANAGE THE AFFAIRS IN A BETTER WAY THE NEW S OCIETY IS BEING FORMED. THE EXISTING SCHOOL AT SECTOR 43, CHANDIGARH IS AL READY HAVING AROUND 1400 STUDENTS WITH THE COMPLETE INFRASTRUCTURE I.E. LAND & BUILDING, FURNITURE & FIXTURE AND OTHER FACILITIES TO RUN THE SCHOOL. THE EXISTING SOCIETY IS REGISTERED UNDER SECTION &0 G AND ALSO G IVEN REGISTRATION UNDER SECTION 10(23)C OF THE INCOME TAX ACT. 8. THE CLAIM OF THE ASSESSEE IS THAT IN ORDER TO AV AIL DEDUCTION UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE ACT, THE ASSESSEE IS TO G ET ITSELF REGISTERED UNDER SECTION 12A OF THE ACT. RELIANCE WAS PLACED ON THE RATIO LAID DOWN IN FIFTH GENERATION EDUCATION SOCIETY VS. CIT ------ FOR THE PROPOSITION THAT FOR THE PURPOSE OF REGISTRATION UN DER SECTION 12A OF THE ACT, ONLY THE OBJECTS OF THE TRUST WERE CHARITABLE OR NOT WAS TO BE SEEN AND AT THE STAGE OF GRANT OF REGISTRATION BY THE CO MMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, THE APPLICATION OF THE INCOME IS NOT TO BE LOO KED IN. THE ASSESSEE PLACED ON RECORD ANOTHER NOTE OF ACTIVITIES BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ALONWITH LETTER DATED 11.9.2012 WHICH RE ADS AS UNDER: NOTE ON ACTIVITY SUCHINTA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY WAS REGISTERED AS A SO CIETY UNDER SOCIETIES REGISTRATION ACT 1860, ON 13T H APRIL 2012 WITH BASIC OBJECTIVE OF IMPARTING EDUCAT ION TO ALIAS MENTIONED IN MEMORANDUM AND ARTICLES O F ASSOCIATION. SHISHU NIKE TAN MODEL SCHOOL, AN EXIST ING SOCIETY IS ALREADY REGISTERED UNDER SECTION 12 A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT SINCE 1968. THE EXISTING SOCIETY IS RUNNING FOUR SCHOOLS, TWO IN CHANDIGARH ,ONE IN MOH ALI AND ONE IN MDC PANCHKULA THE EXISTING SOCIETY IS REGIST ERED UNDER SECTION 80 G AND ALSO REGISTERED UNDER SECTION 10(23)C OF THE INCOME TAX ACT THE NEW SOCIETY PROPOSES TO APPROACH FOR TAKING ON LEASE THE MANAGEMENT OF EXISTING SCHOOL TO BE RUN O N DAY TO DAY BASIS SINCE THE EXISTING SOCIETY IS RUNN ING FOUR SCHOOLS, AND IN ORDER TO EASE THE PRESSURE AND EFFECTIVELY MANAGE THE AFFAIRS IN A BETTER WAY THE NEW SOCIETY CAN PLAY A SUPPORTIVE ROLE.. THE EXISTING SCHOOL AT SECTOR 43 CHANDIGARH IS ALRE ADY HAVING AROUND 1400 STUDENTS WITH COMPLETE INFRASTRUCTURE I.E. LAND & BUILDING, FURNITURE & FI XTURE AND OTHER FACILITIES TO RUN THE SCHOOL. THE S CHOOL IS 6 LOCATED ON A PLOT MEASURING MORE THAN ONE ACRE ALLO TTED BY PUNJAB URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THE SCHO OL BUILDING HAS PROVISION FOR 60 CLASSROOMS, RECEPTION AREA , STAFF ROOMS , SPORTS ROOM ETC. AND A LARGE BASEMENT FOR USE FOR VARIOUS INDOOR ACTIVITIES. THE SCHOOL H AS COMPLETE INFRASTRUCTURE AS PER REQUIREMENTS LAID DOWN BY CBSE FOR COMPUTER AND SCIENCE LABORATORIES, LIBRARY , DRINKING WATER, FIRE FIGHTING, PLAY AREA ETC. THE SCHOOL IS AFFILIATED WITH CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDAR Y EDUCATION UP TO SENIOR SECONDARY CLASSES AND ITS STUDENTS ARE APPEARING FOR THE EXAMS UNDER THE CBSE CURRICULUM. THE SCHOOL IS PROVIDING EDUCATION TO A LL CLASS OF STUDENTS AND PROVIDING FEE CONCESSIONS TO DESERVING STUDENTS UNDER CATEGORY OF FATHERLESS, PO OR MEANS, MERIT STUDENTS AND EWS ETC, TO AROUND 99 STU DENTS, THE SCHOOL IS ALSO REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH T HE PROVISIONS OF THE RIGHT TO EDUCATION ACT, 2009. 9. ALONGWITH THE SAID LETTER DATED 11.9.2012 FILED BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, THE ASSESSEE HAD ENCLOS ED BALANCE SHEET AND PROFIT & LOSS ACCOUNT OF THE EXISTING SHISHU NI KETAN SCHOOL, SECTOR 43, CHANDIGARH FOR THE YEAR 2009-10 AND 2010-11 ALO NGWITH COPY OF CBSE AFFILIATION LETTER TO THE EXISTING SCHOOL AND LAND ALLOTMENT LETTER FROM ESTATE OFFICE, CHANDIGARH. ALL THE ABOVE SAID DOCUMENTS ALONGWITH FORWARDED LETTER ARE PLACED AT PAGES 28 TO 50 OF TH E PAPER BOOK. THE ASSESSEE HAS ALSO ENCLOSED THE COPY OF REGISTRATION OF EXISTING SCHOOL UNDER SECTIONS 12A, 80G AND 10(23) OF THE ACT AT PA GE 50 OF THE PAPER BOOK. HOWEVER, THE ASSESSEE SOCIETY VIDE LETTER DA TED 19.10.2012 POINTED OUT THAT OUT OF THE SEVEN MEMBERS OF THE PR ESENT SOCIETY, FOUR MEMBERS WERE ALREADY MANAGING THE EXISTING SHISHU N IKETAN MODEL SCHOOL WHICH WAS RUNNING FOUR SCHOOLS. THE CLAIM O F THE ASSESSEE WAS THAT AS IT ALREADY HAD EXPERIENCE IN THE FIELD OF E DUCATION AND THE NEW SOCIETY SO FORMED FOR IMPARTING EDUCATION AND RUNNI NG OF SCHOOL WAS ENGAGED IN THE SAID ACTIVITY. THE ASSESSEE ALONGWI TH SAID LETTER HAD ENCLOSED THE BALANCE SHEET OF SHISHU SUCHINTAN EDUC ATIONAL SOCIETY AT PAGE 52 OF THE PAPER BOOK ALONGWITH PROFIT & LOSS A CCOUNT AT PAGE 53 OF THE PAPER BOOK. UNDER THE HEAD CORPUS FUND IT HAD SHOWN RS.5000/- AND BALANCE CASH IN HAND AFTER EXPENSES WAS SHOWN A T RS.3480/-. THE ASSESSEE ALONGWITH LETTER DATED 23.10.2012 FILED BE FORE THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX PLACED AT PAGE 54 OF TH E PAPER BOOK, ENCLOSED A REQUEST FOR PROVIDING THE MANAGEMENT CON TRACT OF SHISHU NIKETAN PUBLIC SCHOOL, SECTOR 66, SAS NAGAR, MOHALI UNDER WHICH IT IS INTIMATED THAT THE REQUEST MADE BY THE ASSESSEE SOC IETY WAS UNDER CONSIDERATION. THE ASSESSEE FURNISHED BEFORE THE CO MMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX THE BALANCE SHEET AS ON 30.9.2012 ALONGW ITH INCOME AND EXPENDITURE ACCOUNT FOR THE PERIOD ENDING 30 TH SEPTEMBER, 2012, UNDER WHICH THE CORPUS FUND WAS REFLECTED AT RS.10,000 WI TH CASH IN HAND AT RS.3420/- AND THE BANK BALANCE AT RS.5000/-. THE E XPENDITURE INCURRED BY THE ASSESSEE WAS LEGAL EXPENSES OF RS.1100/- AND MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES OF RS.480/- WHICH WAS BOOKED UP TO 31.3.2012. 10. THE ISSUE ARISING IN THE PRESENT APPEAL IN THE GIVEN FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES IS THAT WHETHER THE ASSESSEE IS ENTIT LED TO THE CLAIM OF REGISTRATION UNDER SECTION 12AA OF THE ACT. UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 12A OF THE ACT IT IS PROVIDED THAT IN ORDER TO AVAIL THE EXEMPTION UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE ACT, THE TRUST OR I NSTITUTION IS TO GET ITSELF REGISTERED AS PER SECTION 12A OF THE ACT. T HE RELEVANT PROVISIONS OF SECTION 12A AND 12AA OF THE ACT READ AS UNDER: 12A. [(1)] THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 11 AND SECTION 12 SHALL NOT APPLY IN RELATION TO THE INCOME OF ANY TRUST OR INSTITUTION UNLESS THE FOLLO WING CONDITIONS ARE FULFILLED, NAMELY: (A) THE PERSON IN RECEIPT OF THE INCOME HAS MADE AN APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION OF THE TRUST OR INSTITUTION IN THE PRESCRIBED FORM AND IN THE PRESCRIBED MANNER TO THE [***] COMMISSIONER BEFORE THE 1ST DAY OF JULY, 1973 , OR BEFORE THE EXPIRY OF A 7 PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FROM THE DATE OF THE CREATION OF THE TRUST OR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE INSTITUTION, [WHICHEVER IS LATER AND SUCH TRUST OR INSTITUTION IS REGISTERED UNDER SECTION 12AA ] : [ PROVIDED THAT WHERE AN APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION OF THE TRUST OR INSTITUTION IS MADE AFTER THE EXPIRY OF THE PERIOD AFORESAID, THE PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS 11 AND 12 SHALL APPLY IN RELATION TO THE INCOME OF SUCH TRUST OR INSTITUTION, (I) FROM THE DATE OF THE CREATION OF THE TRUST OR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE INSTITUTION IF THE [***] COMMISSIONER IS, FOR REASO NS TO BE RECORDED IN WRITING, SATISFIED THAT THE PERSON IN RECEIPT OF TH E INCOME WAS PREVENTED FROM MAKING THE APPLICATION BEFORE THE EXPIRY OF THE PER IOD AFORESAID FOR SUFFICIENT REASONS; (II) FROM THE 1ST DAY OF THE FINANCIAL YEAR IN WHI CH THE APPLICATION IS MADE, IF THE [***] COMMISSIONER IS NOT SO SATISFIED:] [ PROVIDED FURTHER THAT THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CLAUSE SHALL NOT APPLY IN RELATION TO ANY APPLICATION MADE ON OR AFTER THE 1ST DAY OF JUN E, 2007;] [(AA) THE PERSON IN RECEIPT OF THE INCOME HAS MADE AN APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION OF THE TRUST OR INSTITUTION ON OR AFTER THE 1ST DAY OF JUN E, 2007 IN THE PRESCRIBED FORM AND MANNER TO THE COMMISSIONER AND SUCH TRUST OR INSTIT UTION IS REGISTERED UNDER SECTION 12AA ;] (B) WHERE THE TOTAL INCOME OF THE TRUST OR INSTIT UTION AS COMPUTED UNDER THIS ACT WITHOUT GIVING EFFECT TO [THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 11 AND SECTION 12 EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT WHICH IS NOT CHARGEABLE TO INCOME-TA X IN ANY PREVIOUS YEAR], THE ACCOUNTS OF THE TRUST OR INSTITUTION FOR THAT Y EAR HAVE BEEN AUDITED BY AN ACCOUNTANT AS DEFINED IN THE EXPLANATION BELOW SUB- SECTION (2) OF SECTION 288 AND THE PERSON IN RECEIPT OF THE INCOME FURNISHES ALONG WITH THE RETURN OF INCOME FOR THE RELEVANT ASSESSMENT YEAR THE REPORT OF SUCH AUD IT IN THE PRES-CRIBED FORM DULY SIGNED AND VERIFIED BY SUCH ACCOUNTANT AND SETTING FORTH SUCH PARTICULARS AS MAY BE PRESCRIBED.] (C) [***] [(2) WHERE AN APPLICATION HAS BEEN MADE ON OR AFTER THE 1ST DAY OF JUNE, 2007, THE PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS 11 AND 12 SHALL APPLY IN RELATION TO THE INCOME OF SUCH TRUS T OR INSTITUTION FROM THE ASSESSMENT YEAR IMMEDIATELY FO LLOWING THE FINANCIAL YEAR IN WHICH SUCH APPLICATION IS MADE.] 12AA. (1) THE COMMISSIONER, ON RECEIPT OF AN APPLICATION FOR RE GISTRATION OF A TRUST OR INSTITUTION MADE UNDER CLAUSE (A) [OR CLAUSE (AA) O F SUB-SECTION (1)] OF SECTION 12A , SHALL (A) CALL FOR SUCH DOCUMENTS OR INFORMATION FROM TH E TRUST OR INSTITUTION AS HE THINKS NECESSARY IN ORDER TO SATISFY HIMSELF ABOUT THE GEN UINENESS OF ACTIVITIES OF THE TRUST OR INSTITUTION AND MAY ALSO MAKE SUCH INQUIRIES AS HE MAY DEEM NECESSARY IN THIS BEHALF; AND (B) AFTER SATISFYING HIMSELF ABOUT THE OBJECTS OF THE TRUST OR INSTITUTION AND THE GENUINENESS OF ITS ACTIVITIES, HE (I) SHALL PASS AN ORDER IN WRITING REGISTERING THE TRUST OR INSTITUTION; (II) SHALL, IF HE IS NOT SO SATISFIED, PASS AN ORD ER IN WRITING REFUSING TO REGISTER THE TRUST OR INSTITUTION, AND A COPY OF SUCH ORDER SHALL BE SENT TO THE APPLICANT : 8 PROVIDED THAT NO ORDER UNDER SUB-CLAUSE (II) SHALL BE PASSE D UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS BEEN GIVEN A REASONABLE OPPORTUNITY OF BEING HEARD. [(1A) ALL APPLICATIONS, PENDING BEFORE THE CHIEF CO MMISSIONER ON WHICH NO ORDER HAS BEEN PASSED UNDER CLAUSE (B) OF SUB-SECTION (1) BEFORE T HE 1ST DAY OF JUNE, 1999, SHALL STAND TRANSFERRED ON THAT DAY TO THE COMMISSIONER AND THE COMMISSIONER MAY PROCEED WITH SUCH APPLICATIONS UNDER THAT SUB-SECTION FROM THE STAGE AT WHICH THEY WERE ON THAT DAY.] (2) EVERY ORDER GRANTING OR REFUSING REGISTRATION U NDER CLAUSE (B) OF SUB-SECTION (1) SHALL BE PASSED BEFORE THE EXPIRY OF SIX MONTHS FROM THE END OF THE MONTH IN WHICH THE APPLICATION WAS RECEIVED UNDER CLAUSE (A) [OR CLAUSE (AA) OF SUB-SE CTION (1)] OF SECTION 12A .] [(3) WHERE A TRUST OR AN INSTITUTION HAS BEEN GRANT ED REGISTRATION UNDER CLAUSE (B) OF SUB- SECTION (1) AND SUBSEQUENTLY THE COMMISSIONER IS SA TISFIED THAT THE ACTIVITIES OF SUCH TRUST OR INSTITUTION ARE NOT GENUINE OR ARE NOT BEING CARRIE D OUT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE OBJECTS OF THE TRUST OR INSTITUTION, AS THE CASE MAY BE, HE SHALL PASS AN ORDER IN WRITING CANCELLING THE REGISTRATION OF SUCH TRUST OR INSTITUTION: PROVIDED THAT NO ORDER UNDER THIS SUB-SECTION SHALL BE PASSE D UNLESS SUCH TRUST OR INSTITUTION HAS BEEN GIVEN A REASONABLE OPPORTUNITY OF BEING HE ARD.] 11. IN ORDER TO AVAIL THE BENEFIT OF EXEMPTION UNDE R SECTION 11/12 OF THE ACT, A TRUST OR INSTITUTION IS TO GET ITSELF RE GISTERED UNDER SECTION 12A OF THE ACT. THE REQUIREMENT OF THE ACT IS THAT THE ASSESSEE IS TO APPLY TO THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX FOR REGISTE RING THE TRUST OR INSTITUTION BEING HELD FOR CHARITABLE OR RELIGIOUS PURPOSES. THE TRUST OR INSTITUTION IS REQUIRED TO MAKE AN APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION OF THE TRUST OR INSTITUTION IN THE PRESCRIBED FORM PROVIDE D UNDER RULE 17A IN FORM NO.10A ALONGWITH INSTRUMENT EVIDENCING THE CRE ATION OF THE TRUST. THE SAID APPLICATION IS TO BE MADE BEFORE THE EXPIR Y OF A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FROM THE DATE OF CREATION OF THE TRUST OR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE INSTITUTION. THE PROCEDURE FOR REGISTRATION IS PRO VIDED UNDER SECTION 12AA OF THE ACT WHERE THE COMMISSIONER ON RECEIPT O F AN APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION OF A TRUST OR INSTITUTION MADE UNDER S ECTION 12A OF THE ACT SHALL CALL UPON THE APPLICANT TO FURNISH SUCH DOCUM ENTS OR INFORMATION AS HE THINKS NECESSARY IN ORDER TO SATISFY HIMSELF ABOUT THE GENUINENESS OF THE ACTIVITIES OF THE TRUST OR THE INSTITUTION. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX MAY ALSO MAKE SUCH ENQUIRY AS HE DEEM NE CESSARY IN THIS BEHALF. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ON BEING SA TISFIED ABOUT THE OBJECTS OF THE TRUST AND GENUINENESS OF ITS ACTIVIT IES IS TO PASS AN ORDER IN WRITING REGISTERING THE TRUST OR INSTITUTION OR REFUSING TO REGISTER THE TRUST OR INSTITUTION, COPY OF WHICH IS TO BE SERVED UPON THE ASSESSEE. IT IS FURTHER PROVIDED UNDER THE SECTION THAT NO ORDER UNDER SUB-CLAUSE(II) SHALL BE PASSED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS BEEN GIVEN A REASONABLE OPPORTUNITY OF BEING HEARD. THE TIME LIMIT FOR PAS SING THE ORDER GRANTING OR REFUSING THE REGISTRATION UNDER SUB-SEC TION (1) SHALL BE BEFORE THE EXPIRY OF SIX MONTHS FROM THE END OF MON TH IN WHICH THE APPLICATION WAS RECEIVED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF INC OME TAX, AS PER SUB-SECTION (2) OF SECTION 12AA OF THE ACT. UNDER SECTION 12AA(3) OF THE ACT, THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX IS EMPOWERED TO WITHDRAW THE REGISTRATION ALREADY GRANTED TO A TRUST OR INSTITU TION IN CASE HE IS SATISFIED THAT THE ACTIVITIES OF SUCH TRUST OR INST ITUTION ARE NOT GENUINE OR ARE NOT BEING CARRIED OUT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE OBJECTS OF THE TRUST OR INSTITUTION. 12. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE SAID PROVISIONS OF THE ACT , THE COMMISSIONER ON RECEIPT OF THE APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION OF A TRUST OR INSTITUTION HAS TO SATISFY HIMSELF ABOUT THE OBJECTS OF THE TRUST O R INSTITUTION AND ALSO CALL FOR AND COLLECT INFORMATION ABOUT THE GENUINEN ESS OF THE ACTIVITIES OF THE TRUST OR INSTITUTION. THE COMMISSIONER IS E MPOWERED UNDER THE 9 ACT TO MAKE ENQUIRIES IN THIS REGARD AS HE MAY DEEM FIT. IN ORDER TO AVAIL BENEFIT OF REGISTRATION UNDER SECTION 12AA OF THE ACT, THE APPLICANT IS TO SATISFY THE COMMISSIONER TO WHOM SUCH APPLICA TION HAS BEEN MADE UNDER SECTION 12A OF THE ACT, THAT THE OBJECTS OF T HE TRUST ARE CHARITABLE IN NATURE AND ALSO TO ESTABLISH ITS CASE OF GENUINE NESS OF THE ACTIVITIES BEING UNDERTAKEN OR GOING TO BE UNDERTAKEN BY THE T RUST OR INSTITUTION. 13. SECTION 2(15) PROVIDES AS UNDER: 2( 15 ) CHARITABLE PURPOSE INCLUDES RELIEF OF THE POOR, EDUCATION, MEDICAL REL IEF, [ PRESERVATION OF ENVIRONMENT (INCLUDING WATERSHEDS, FORESTS AND WILDLIFE) AND PRESERVATION OF MONUMENTS OR PLACES OR OBJECTS OF A RTISTIC OR HISTORIC INTEREST, ] AND THE ADVANCEMENT OF ANY OTHER OBJECT OF GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITY: PROVIDED THAT THE ADVANCEMENT OF ANY OTHER OBJECT OF GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITY SHALL NOT BE A CHARITABLE PURPOSE, IF IT INVOLVES THE CARRYIN G ON OF ANY ACTIVITY IN THE NATURE OF TRADE, COMMERCE OR BUSINESS, OR ANY ACTIVITY OF REN DERING ANY SERVICE IN RELATION TO ANY TRADE, COMMERCE OR BUSINESS, FOR A CESS OR FEE OR ANY OTHER CONSIDERATION, IRRESPECTIVE OF THE NATURE OF USE OR APPLICATION, O R RETENTION, OF THE INCOME FROM SUCH ACTIVITY. 14. THE DEFINITION UNDER SECTION 2(15) OF THE ACT D EFINING CHARITABLE PURPOSE AS AN INCLUSIVE DEFINITION UNDER WHICH THE TRUST OR INSTITUTION CARRYING ON THE FOLLOWING ACTIVITIES ARE SAID TO HA VE CARRIED ON CHARITABLE ACTIVITIES: A) RELIEF TO THE POOR; B) EDUCATION; C) MEDICAL RELIEF; D) PRESERVATION OF ENVIRONMENT; E) PRESERVATION OF MONUMENTS OR PLACES OR OBJECTS O F ARTISTIC OR HISTORIC INTEREST; F) ADVANCEMENT OF ANY OTHER OBJECT OF GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITY. 15. IN ORDER TO AVAIL THE BENEFIT OF EXEMPTION UNDE R SECTION 11/12 OF THE ACT THE ACTIVITIES OF THE TRUST OR INSTITUTION IS TO BE CHARITABLE OR FOR RELIGIOUS PURPOSES. AS POINTED OUT IN THE PARAS HE REINABOVE, THE CONDITIONS FOR APPLICABILITY OF SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE ACT ARE PROVIDED UNDER SECTION 12A OF THE ACT AND ONE OF THE CONDITI ONS IS THAT THE PERSON IN RECEIPT OF THE INCOME WHICH HE CLAIMS TO BE FOR CHARITABLE PURPOSES IS TO MAKE AN APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION OF THE TRUS T OR THE INSTITUTION IN THE PRESCRIBED FORM AND IN THE PRESCRIBED MANNER TO THE COMMISSIONER WITHIN THE STIPULATED PERIOD OF CREATION OF THE TRU ST OR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE INSTITUTION. ON RECEIPT OF THE APPLICATION IN THE REQUISITE FORM NO.10A ALONGWITH INSTRUMENT OF CREATION OF THE TRUS T OR THE INSTITUTION, THE PROCEDURE FOR REGISTRATION OF THE TRUST OR THE INSTITUTION BY THE COMMISSIONER IS PROVIDED UNDER SECTION 12AA OF THE ACT. ADMITTEDLY, AT THE TIME OF GRANT OF REGISTRATION THE COMMISSIONER IS NOT EMPOWERED TO EXAMINE THE APPLICATION OF INCOME BUT HE HAS TO EXA MINE WHETHER THE APPLICATION IS MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREM ENTS OF SECTION 12A OF THE ACT AND WHETHER FORM NO.10A HAS BEEN PROPERL Y FILLED IN. THE COMMISSIONER IS FURTHER TO EXAMINE WHETHER THE OBJE CTS OF THE TRUST ARE CHARITABLE OR NOT AND ALSO TO SATISFY HIMSELF ABOUT THE GENUINENESS OF THE ACTIVITIES OF THE TRUST OR THE INSTITUTION. THE CO MMISSIONER IS NOT TO EXAMINE THE APPLICATION OF INCOME AT THIS JUNCTURE. THE HON'BLE SUPREME COURT IN CIT VS. U.P. FOREST CORPORATION [2 30 ITR 944 (SC)], 10 HELD THAT IN ORDER TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE PROVISIONS OF SEC TION 11 OF THE ACT, THE TRUST OR THE INSTITUTION HAS TO GET IT SELF REGISTERED . WHETHER THE INCOME OF THE INSTITUTION CAN BE REGARDED AS BE ING HELD FOR CHARITABLE PURPOSES AND WHETHER THE INSTITUTION IS ENTITLED TO REGISTRATION UNDER SECTION 12A OF THE ACT, REQUIRES INVESTIGATION OF FACTS . IN VIEW THEREOF, SECTION 12AA OF THE ACT RECOGNIZES THE PRINCIPLE LAID DOWN BY THE HON'BLE SUPREME COURT AND COMMISSIONER UNDER SECTION 12AA OF THE ACT IS EMPOWERED TO CALL FOR SUCH DOCUM ENTS OR INFORMATION FROM THE TRUST OR THE INSTITUTION IN ORDER TO SATIS FY HIMSELF THAT THE OBJECTS OF TRUST ARE CHARITABLE AND ALSO ABOUT THE GENUINENESS OF THE ACTIVITIES OF THE TRUST OR THE INSTITUTION AND IS A LSO EMPOWERED TO MAKE SUCH ENQUIRIES AS HE DEEM NECESSARY IN THIS REGARD. 16. NOW COMING TO THE FACTS OF THE PRESENT CASE THE COMMISSIONER ON RECEIPT OF APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION UNDER SECTI ON 12A OF THE ACT FROM THE ASSESSEE/APPLICANT, HAD DIRECTED THE ASSESSING OFFICER TO MAKE CERTAIN ENQUIRIES AND FORWARD THE SAME TO THE COMMI SSIONER. FURTHER ENQUIRIES WERE MADE BY THE COMMISSIONER DURING THE COURSE OF PROCEEDINGS IN RELATION TO GRANT OF REGISTRATION UN DER SECTION 12A OF THE ACT. WE HAVE ELABORATELY REFERRED TO THE ENQUIRIES MADE BY THE COMMISSIONER UNDER PARA 3 AND NOTE ON ACTIVITY AND THE EXPLANATION FILED BY THE ASSESSEE BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER IN PA RAS 7 TO 9 OF OUR ORDER. THE AIMS AND OBJECTS OF THE ASSESSEE SOCIET Y AS PER CLAUSE 4(I) AND 4(II) ARE PLACED AT PAGES 7 AND 8 OF THE PAPER BOOK PROVIDES AS UNDER: I) TO PROVIDE ADVANCEMENT, RESEARCH AND DISSEMINATION OF EDUCATION-LITERACY, SCIENTIFIC AND SCHOLASTIC AND OPENING AND TO START, ESTABLISH, RUN, TAKEOVER OR MANAGE AND MAINTAIN SCHOOLS WITH AN OBJECT TO PROVIDE SOUND PRE-PRIMARY, PRIMARY, MIDDLE, SECONDARY AND HIGHER EDUCATION INCLUDING RUNNING OF ENGINEERING AND MEDICAL COLLEGES, POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTES AND VARIOUS VOCATIONAL COURSES TO CHILDREN SEEKING RECOGNITION. THE SOCIETY SHALL PROVIDE EDUCATION TO THE STUDENTS FOR THE VARIOUS EXAMINATIONS CONDUCTED BY DIFFERENT INDIAN/FOREIGN UNIVERSITIES, BOARDS AND INSTITUTIONS ETC. II) TO AFFILIATE, GET RECOGNITION OF THE SCHOOLS AN D COLLEGES MAINTAINED BY THE SOCIETY TO THE UNIVERSITIES, EDUCATION BOARDS AND OTHER AUTHORITIES AND TO OBSERVE THE RULES AND REGULATIONS PRESCRIBED BY THEM OR CONTAINED IN THE EDUCATION CODE, ETC. AND TO RECEIVE GRANTS-IN- AID. 17. THE PERUSAL OF THE ABOVE SAID OBJECTS OF THE A SSESSEE SOCIETY REFLECT THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS A WIDE RANGE OF OBJEC TS, WHICH IT MAY CONSIDER AS ITS ACTIVITY OF RUNNING THE TRUST. THE OBJECTS OF THE ASSESSEE ARE IN DIFFERENT DIRECTIONS AND DIFFERENT FIELDS AN D ARE GENERAL IN NATURE. IF WE HAVE LOOK AT CLAUSES 4(I) AND 4(II) OF AIMS A ND OBJECTS, THE OBJECTS, OF THE TRUST ARE TO PROVIDE: A) ADVANCEMENT, RESEARCH AND DISSEMINATION OF EDUCATION-LITERACY, SCIENTIFIC AND SCHOLASTIC; 11 B) OPENING AND TO START, ESTABLISH, RUN, TAKEOVER O R MANAGE AND MAINTAIN SCHOOLS; C) RUNNING OF ENGINEERING AND MEDICAL COLLEGES, POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTES AND VARIOUS VOCATIONAL COURSES TO CHILDREN SEEKING RECOGNITION; D) EDUCATION TO THE STUDENTS FOR THE VARIOUS EXAMINATIONS CONDUCTED BY DIFFERENT INDIAN/FOREIGN UNIVERSITIES, BOARDS AND INSTITUTIONS ETC; E) AFFILIATE, GET RECOGNITION OF THE SCHOOLS AND COLLEGES MAINTAINED BY THE SOCIETY TO THE UNIVERSITIES, EDUCATION BOARDS AND OTHER AUTHORITIES; F) TO OBSERVE THE RULES AND REGULATIONS PRESCRIBED BY THEM OR CONTAINED IN THE EDUCATION CODE, ETC. AND TO RECEIVE GRANTS-IN-AID. 18. IN VIEW OF THE VARIED OBJECTS OF THE TRUST PROV IDED IN THE AIMS AND OBJECTS OF THE INSTITUTION, THE COMMISSIONER DURING THE COURSE OF PROCEEDINGS REQUISITIONED THE ASSESSEE TO FURNISH NOTE ON ACTIVITY TO BE UNDERTAKEN BY THE ASSESSEE SOCIETY IN ORDER TO C ARRY ON THE OBJECTS OF ITS TRUST. THE FIRST NOTE ON ACTIVITY WAS FURNISHE D BY THE ASSESSEE ALONGWITH LETTER DATED 5.6.2012 FILED BEFORE THE AS SESSING OFFICER, CHANDIGARH, WHICH PROVIDED AS UNDER: NOTE ON ACTIVITY SUCHINTA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY WAS REGISTERED AS SOCI ETY UNDER SOCIETY REGISTRATION ACT ON 13 APRIL 2012 FOR IMPARTING EDU CATIONAL TO ALL AS MENTIONED IN MEMORANDUM AND ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION . SHISHU NIKETAN MODEL SCHOOL EXISTING SOCIETY IS ALREADY REGISTERED UNDER SECTION 12 A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT SINCE 1968.IT HAS ONE OF THE BRA NCHES IN SECTOR 43, CHANDIGARH .THE NEW SOCIETY PROPOSES TO TAKE THE EX ISTING THE SCHOOL ON LEASE TO BE RUN BY THE NEW SOCIETY. SINCE THE OLD S OCIETY IS RUNNING FOUR SCHOOLS, TWO IN CHANDIGARH, MOHALI AND PANCHKULA TO EASE THE PRESSURE AND TO MANAGE THE AFFAIRS IN A BETTER WAY THE NEW S OCIETY IS BEING FORMED. THE EXISTING SCHOOL AT SECTOR 43, CHANDIGARH IS AL READY HAYING AROUND 1400 STUDENTS WITH THE COMPLETE INFRASTRUCTURE I.E. LAND & BUILDING, FURNITURE & FIXTURE AND OTHER FACILITIES TO RUN THE SCHOOL. THE EXISTING SOCIETY IS REGISTERED UNDER SECTION &0 G AND ALSO G IVEN REGISTRATION UNDER SECTION 10(23)C OF THE INCOME TAX ACT. 19. DURING THE PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER THE ASSESSEE PLACED ANOTHER NOTE ON ACTIVITY ALONGWITH LETTER DATED 11.9.2012 WHICH READS AS UNDER: NOTE ON ACTIVITY SUCHINTA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY WAS REGISTERED AS A SO CIETY UNDER SOCIETIES REGISTRATION ACT 1860, ON 13T H APRIL 2012 WITH BASIC OBJECTIVE OF IMPARTING EDUCAT ION TO ALIAS MENTIONED IN MEMORANDUM AND ARTICLES O F ASSOCIATION. SHISHU NIKE TAN MODEL SCHOOL, AN EXIST ING SOCIETY IS ALREADY REGISTERED UNDER SECTION 12 A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT SINCE 1968. THE EXISTING SOCIETY IS RUNNING FOUR SCHOOLS, TWO IN CHANDIGARH ,ONE IN MOH ALI AND ONE IN MDC PANCHKULA THE EXISTING SOCIETY IS REGIST ERED UNDER SECTION 80 G AND ALSO REGISTERED UNDER SECTION 10(23)C OF THE INCOME TAX ACT 12 THE NEW SOCIETY PROPOSES TO APPROACH FOR TAKING ON LEASE THE MANAGEMENT OF EXISTING SCHOOL TO BE RUN O N DAY TO DAY BASIS SINCE THE EXISTING SOCIETY IS RUNN ING FOUR SCHOOLS, AND IN ORDER TO EASE THE PRESSURE AND EFFECTIVELY MANAGE THE AFFAIRS IN A BETTER WAY THE NEW SOCIETY CAN PLAY A SUPPORTIVE ROLE.. THE EXISTING SCHOOL AT SECTOR 43 CHANDIGARH IS ALRE ADY HAVING AROUND 1400 STUDENTS WITH COMPLETE INFRASTRUCTURE I.E. LAND & BUILDING, FURNITURE & FI XTURE AND OTHER FACILITIES TO RUN THE SCHOOL. THE S CHOOL IS LOCATED ON A PLOT MEASURING MORE THAN ONE ACRE ALLO TTED BY PUNJAB URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THE SCHO OL BUILDING HAS PROVISION FOR 60 CLASSROOMS, RECEPTION AREA , STAFF ROOMS , SPORTS ROOM ETC. AND A LARGE BASEMENT FOR USE FOR VARIOUS INDOOR ACTIVITIES. THE SCHOOL H AS COMPLETE INFRASTRUCTURE AS PER REQUIREMENTS LAID DOWN BY CBSE FOR COMPUTER AND SCIENCE LABORATORIES, LIBRARY , DRINKING WATER, FIRE FIGHTING, PLAY AREA ETC. THE SCHOOL IS AFFILIATED WITH CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDAR Y EDUCATION UP TO SENIOR SECONDARY CLASSES AND ITS STUDENTS ARE APPEARING FOR THE EXAMS UNDER THE CBSE CURRICULUM. THE SCHOOL IS PROVIDING EDUCATION TO A LL CLASS OF STUDENTS AND PROVIDING FEE CONCESSIONS TO DESERVING STUDENTS UNDER CATEGORY OF FATHERLESS, PO OR MEANS, MERIT STUDENTS AND EWS ETC, TO AROUND 99 STU DENTS, THE SCHOOL IS ALSO REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH T HE PROVISIONS OF THE RIGHT TO EDUCATION ACT, 2009. 20. DURING THE COURSE OF HEARING, THE LEARNED A.R. FOR THE ASSESSEE WAS SPECIFICALLY ASKED AS TO WHAT WERE THE ACTIVITIES F OR WHICH THE SAID SOCIETY WAS FORMED. THE LEARNED A.R. FOR THE ASSES SEE SPECIFICALLY POINTED OUT THAT THE TRUST WAS FORMED ON 13.4.2012 AND ITS OBJECTS WERE AS PER CLAUSE 4(I) AND 4(II). OUR ATTENTION WAS DR AWN TO THE OBSERVATIONS OF THE COMMISSIONER IN PARA 3 WHEREIN IT HAD BEEN CLEARLY CLAIMED BY THE ASSESSEE THAT THE EXISTING SOCIETY I .E. SHISHU NIKETAN MODEL SCHOOL WAS ALREADY REGISTERED UNDER SECTION 1 2AA OF THE ACT AND WAS RUNNING FOUR SCHOOLS. THE APPLICANT UNDER THE NEW SOCIETY WAS PROPOSING TO TAKE OVER ON LEASE THE MANAGEMENT OF O NE OF THE EXISTING SCHOOLS AND RUNNING ON DAY-TO-DAY BASIS. THE LEARN ED A.R. FOR THE ASSESSEE FURTHER POINTED OUT THAT THE ASSESSEE HAD PROVIDED FREE BOOKS TO POOR STUDENTS, WHICH WAS IN FURTHERANCE IN CARRYING ON CHARITABLE ACTIVITIES. WHEN CONFRONTED WITH THE FACT THAT TAK ING OVER OF RUNNING SCHOOL WAS IN THE NATURE OF CARRYING ON THE BUSINES S AND NOT IN THE LINE OF IMPARTING EDUCATION PER-SE. THE LEARNED A.R. F OR THE ASSESSEE POINTED OUT THAT THE SOCIETY MAY CONSIDER ESTABLISH ING OR RUNNING A SCHOOL. IN THE TOTALITY OF THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTA NCES OF THE CASE, WE ARE OF THE VIEW THAT THE OBJECTS OF THE TRUST ARE VARIE D AND THE OBJECTS ARE NOT IN ANY PARTICULAR DIRECTION OF IMPARTING EDUCAT ION OR FOR THE RELIEF OF THE POOR. FURTHER THE ASSESSEE HIMSELF HAD NOT IDE NTIFIED THE PARTICULAR OBJECT WHICH IT WANTS TO UNDERTAKE TO CARRY ON THE ACTIVITIES OF THE SOCIETY AND IT IS NOT A CASE OF TRUST WHERE THE SOL E OBJECT IS IN LINE OF PROVIDING EDUCATION BY WAY OF ESTABLISHING THE SCHO OL, COLLEGE, UNIVERSITY AND THE STEPS TAKEN BY THE TRUST FOR CAR RYING ON THE SAID ACTIVITIES COULD BE RECOGNIZED AS THE OBJECTS OF TH E TRUST IN ORDER TO ESTABLISH THE GENUINENESS OF THE ACTIVITIES TO BE U NDERTAKEN BY THE SOCIETY. THE ASSESSEE BEFORE US HAD POINTED OUT IN PARAS HEREINABOVE TOO MANY OBJECTS, WHICH ARE IN VARIED DIRECTIONS AN D SOME OF THE OBJECTS ARE NOT CHARITABLE IN NATURE. THE ASSESSEE TILL DA TE HAS NOT IDENTIFIED THE PRIMARY OBJECTS WHICH THE TRUST WANTS TO UNDERT AKE IN ORDER TO CARRY ON ITS CHARITABLE ACTIVITIES. ONCE THE DIRECTION O F THE TRUST IS NOT ESTABLISHED, THE GENUINENESS OF THE ACTIVITIES CANN OT BE VERIFIED BY THE COMMISSIONER. THE HON'BLE MADRAS HIGH COURT IN CIT VS. OOTACAMUND GYMKHANA CLUB [110 ITR 392 (MAD)] HAD HELD THAT ON AN APPLICATION BEING FILED UNDER SECTION 12A OF A TRUST OF INSTITU TION IS REGISTERED AS CHARITABLE OR RELIGIOUS ONE AND THE REGISTRATION IT SELF WOULD BE SUFFICIENT PROOF OF THE FACT THAT THE TRUST OR INSTITUTION CON CERNED WAS CREATED OR ESTABLISHED FOR CHARITABLE OR RELIGIOUS PURPOSE. 13 21. THE HON'BLE SUPREME COURT IN CIT VS. ANDHRA CHA MBER OF COMMERCE [55 ITR 722 (SC)] HAD HELD THAT IF THERE WERE TWO DISTINCT OBJECTS, ONE OF WHICH WAS CHARITABLE AND THE OTHER NOT CHARITABLE AND IF THE FUND OF THE ASSOCIATION COULD BE APPLIED FOR EI THER OF THESE PURPOSES AT THE DISCRETION OF THOSE IN AUTHORITY, THEN IT CA NNOT BE HELD THAT THERE WAS ANY PROPERTY HELD UNDER TRUST WHOLLY FOR CHARIT ABLE PURPOSE . 22. THE OBJECTS OF THE ASSESSEE SOCIETY HAVE TO BE CHARITABLE OR RELIGIOUS, AS THE CASE MAY BE, IN ORDER TO AVAIL TH E BENEFITS UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE ACT. THE CASE OF THE ASS ESSEE WAS THAT SOME OF THE TRUSTEES WERE ALREADY RUNNING SCHOOLS AND IT PR OPOSES TO TAKE OVER ONE OF SUCH SCHOOLS FOR BETTER ADMINISTRATION. THE SECOND PLEA WAS THAT IT HAD PROVIDED FREE BOOKS TO POOR STUDENTS, FOR WH ICH NO EVIDENCE WAS FILED. THE ACTIVITIES PROPOSED TO BE UNDERTAKEN BY THE ASSESSEE SOCIETY ARE NOT CHARITABLE IN NATURE. ANOTHER ASPECT TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE CASE OF THE ASSESSEE THAT IT HAD NOT TAKEN ANY STEP TO INITIATE ANY OF THE ACTIVITIES OUT OF PRIMARY OBJECTS AS PROVIDED UNDER THE AIMS AND OBJECTS OF THE SOCIETY AND IN THE ABSENCE OF THE SAME THE S ECOND LIMB OF THE EXERCISE TO BE CARRIED ON BY THE COMMISSIONER OF SA TISFACTION OF THE GENUINENESS OF THE ACTIVITIES COULD NOT BE ADDRESSE D BY THE COMMISSIONER. 23. THE HONBLE PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT IN CIT VS. B.K.K. MEMORIAL TRUST (SUPRA) HAS HELD THAT AT THE STAGE O F GRANTING REGISTRATION, OBJECTS OF THE TRUST ONLY HAD TO BE C ONSIDERED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND THE REGISTRATION COULD NOT BE DENI ED ON THE GROUND THAT IT WAS NOT UTILIZING ITS INCOME FOR CHARITABLE PURPOSES. 24. IN VIEW THEREOF, THE COMMISSIONER IS TO LOOK IN TO THE OBJECTS OF THE SOCIETY TO DETERMINE WHETHER THE SAME ARE CHARITABL E IN NATURE OR NOT. IN THE FACTS OF THE PRESENT CASE AND AS HELD BY US IN THE PARAS HEREINABOVE, ON CONSIDERATION OF THE FACTUAL ASPECT S WE FIND THAT SOME OF THE OBJECTS OF THE ASSESSEE SOCIETY ARE NOT CHARITA BLE IN NATURE AND WE ARE IN CONFORMITY WITH THE FINDING OF THE COMMISSIO NER OF INCOME TAX THAT THOUGH THE ASSESSEE SOCIETY WAS REGISTERED WIT H REGISTRAR OF SOCIETIES ON 13.4.2012 BUT NO ACTIVITY HAD BEEN STA RTED UP TO THE DATE OF PRESENT PROCEEDINGS AND IN THE ABSENCE OF THE SAME THERE WAS NO MATERIAL TO VERIFY THE OBJECTS AND ACTIVITIES OF TH E SOCIETY AND THEIR GENUINENESS. IN VIEW THEREOF, WE UPHOLD THE ORDER OF COMMISSIONER IN REFUSING TO GRANT REGISTRATION TO THE ASSESSEE UNDE R SECTION 12AA OF THE ACT AND THE GROUNDS OF APPEAL RAISED BY THE ASSESSE E ARE THUS DISMISSED. 9. IN VIEW OF THE FACTUAL ASPECTS BEING IDENTICAL A ND FOLLOWING THE SAME PARITY OF REASONING AS BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL IN SUCHINTA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY VS. CIT (SUPRA) WE UPHOLD THE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX IN REFUSING TO GRANT REGISTRATION TO THE ASSESSEE UNDER 14 SECTION 12A OF THE ACT. THE GROUNDS OF APPEAL RAIS ED BY THE ASSESSEE ARE THUS DISMISSED. 10. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON THIS 6 TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2013. SD/- SD/- (T.R.SOOD) (SUSHMA CHOWLA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED : 6 TH SEPTEMBER, 2013 *RATI* COPY TO: THE APPELLANT/THE RESPONDENT/THE CIT(A)/TH E CIT/THE DR. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR, ITAT, CHANDIGARH