, A IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL A BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ./ I.T.A. NO. 1354/AHD/2015 ( ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2010-11) ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CIRCLE-2(1)(2), ABAD, 1 ST FLOOR, NAVJIVAN TRUST BUILDING, AHMEDABAD - 380009 / VS. M/S. MEGHMANI ORGANICS LTD. PLOT NO. 183-184, PHASE II, GIDC, VATVA, AHMEDABAD 382 445 ./ ./ PAN/GIR NO. : AABCM0644E ( APPELLANT ) .. ( / RESPONDENT ) / APPELLANT BY : SHRI S. K. DEV, SR. D.R. / RESPONDENT BY : SHRI PARIN SHAH, A.R. DATE OF HEARING 09/10/2018 !'# / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 10/10/2018 / O R D E R PER PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA - AM: THE CAPTIONED APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED AT THE INSTANCE OF THE REVENUE AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-2, AHMEDABAD (CIT(A) IN SHORT), DATED 27.02.2015 ARISING IN THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 28.02.2014 PA SSED BY THE ITA NO.1354/AHD/15 [ACIT VS. M/S. MEGHMANI ORGANICS LTD.] A.Y. 2010-11 - 2 - ASSESSING OFFICER (AO) UNDER S. 143(3) R.W.S. 144C OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 (THE ACT) CONCERNING ASSESSMENT YEAR 2010-11. 2. THE GROUNDS OF APPEAL RAISED BY THE REVENUE REA DS AS UNDER:- 1. THE LD. CIT(A) HAS ERRED IN LAW AND ON FACTS IN DELETING THE DISALLOWANCE OF RS.59,21,300/- MADE BY THE AO IN RESPECT OF CLAIM U /S 80IA(4) OF THE I.T. ACT. 2. THE LD. CIT(A) HAS ERRED IN LAW AND ON FACTS IN DELETING THE DISALLOWANCE U/S10B ADDED BACK TO THE BOOK PROFIT U/S 115JB OF T HE I.T. ACT. 3. AT THE TIME OF HEARING, IT WAS SUBMITTED BY THE LD.AR FOR THE ASSESSEE THAT THE APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE I S HIT BY RECENTLY ISSUED CBDT CIRCULAR NO.3 OF 2018 DATED 11/07/2018 REVISING THE PREVIOUS THRESHOLDS PERTAINING TO TAX EFFECTS. AS PER AFORESAID CIRCULAR, ALL PENDING APPEALS FILED BY REVENUE ARE LIABLE TO BE DISMISSED AS A MEASURE FOR REDUCING LITIGATION WHER E THE TAX EFFECT DOES NOT EXCEED THE PRESCRIBED MONETARY LIMIT WHICH IS NOW REVISED AT RS.20 LAKHS. IN THE INSTANT CASE, THE T AX EFFECT ON THE DISPUTED ISSUES RAISED BY THE REVENUE IS STATED TO BE NOT EXCEEDING RS.20 LAKHS AND THEREFORE APPEAL OF THE R EVENUE IS REQUIRED TO BE DISMISSED IN LIMINE . 4. THE LEARNED DR FOR THE REVENUE FAIRLY ADMITTED T HE APPLICABILITY OF THE CBDT CIRCULAR NO. 3 OF 2018. A CCORDINGLY, APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS DISMISSED AS NOT MAINTAINA BLE. HOWEVER, IT WILL BE OPEN TO THE REVENUE TO SEEK RESTORATION OF ITS APPEAL ON ITA NO.1354/AHD/15 [ACIT VS. M/S. MEGHMANI ORGANICS LTD.] A.Y. 2010-11 - 3 - SHOWING INAPPLICABILITY OF THE AFORESAID CBDT CIRCU LAR IN ANY MANNER. 5. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS DISM ISSED. SD/- SD/- (RAJPAL YADAV) (PRADIP K UMAR KEDIA) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AHMEDABAD: DATED 10/10/2018 TRUE COPY S. K. SINHA !'#' / COPY OF ORDER FORWARDED TO:- &. / REVENUE 2. / ASSESSEE (. )*+ , / CONCERNED CIT 4. ,- / CIT (A) /. 012 33*+4 *+#4 56) / DR, ITAT, AHMEDABAD 7. 289 : / GUARD FILE. BY ORDER / 4 /5 *+#4 56) THIS ORDER PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT ON 10/10/201 8