Ujala Majoor Saha. Sanstha Maryadit, Latur V. Income-tax Officer,

ITA 1358/PUN/2016

• Counselvise Citation: [2016] 131 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 1064 (ITAT-PUNE)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 month(s) 4 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 26-08-2016
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Next Hearing Date: 22-08-2016
• Assessment Year: 2010-2011
• Appeal Filed On: 21-06-2016
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: P L KUREEL
• Section: 143(3)

Judgement Text

- IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCH SMC , PUNE , BEFORE MS. SUSHMA CHOWLA, JM . / ITA NO. 1 3 58 /PN/201 6 / ASSESSM ENT YEAR : 20 1 0 - 1 1 UJALA MAJOOR SAHA. SANSTHA MARYADIT, AT POST : SINDHKHEDA, TALUKA : NILANGA, DIST.: LATUR . / APPELLANT PAN: A AATU1813B VS. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER , WARD 3 ( 3 ), LATUR . / RESPONDENT / APPELLANT BY : NONE / RESPONDENT BY : SHRI P.L. KUREEL / DATE OF HEARING : 22 . 0 8 .201 6 / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 26 . 0 8 .201 6 / ORDER PER SUSHMA CHOWLA, J M : TH IS APPEAL FILED BY TH E ASSESSEE IS AGAINST THE ORDER OF CIT (A) - 2 , AURANGABAD , DATED 15 . 0 4 .20 1 6 RELATING TO ASSESSMENT YEAR 20 1 0 - 1 1 AGAINST ORDER PASSED UNDER SECTION 1 4 3(3) OF THE INCOME - TAX ACT , 1961 (IN SHORT THE ACT) . 2 . THE REGISTRY HAD ISSUED DEFECT NOTICE TO THE ASSES SEE TO REMOVE THE FOLLOWING DEFECTS: - ITA NO. 1 3 58 /PN/20 1 6 UJALA MAJOOR SAH. SANSTHA MARYADIT 2 A) APPELLANT/RESPONDENT IS NOT CORRECTLY SHOWN IN THE APPEAL FORM; B) COL. NO.11 IN THE MEMO OF APPEAL NOT CORRECTLY FILED IN; C) FORM # 35/GROUND OF APPEAL / STATEMENT OF THE FACTS BEFORE THE CIT(A) / DY.CIT NOT F ILED IN DUPLICATE; D) COPY OF ASSTT. ORDER NOT FILED IN DUPLICATE U/S 143(3) E) OTHERS: REFER RULE 13 OF IT(ITAT) RULES 1963 FOR WHO SHOULD BE MADE RESPONDENT BEFORE ITAT. ALSO PIN CODE OF THE ASSESSEE NOT FURNISHED. 3. THE APPEAL OF ASSESSEE WAS FIXED FOR HEARING ON 27.07.2016 AND THEREAFTER ON 22.08.2016. THE NOTICE WAS ISSUED TO THE PARTIES BY RPAD. HOWEVER, THE ASSESSEE HAS FAILED TO APPEAR ON EITHER OF THE DATES OF HEARING NOR FILED ANY APPLICATION FOR ADJOURNMENT. THE ASSESSEE HAS FAILED TO REM OVE DEFECTS POINTED OUT BY THE REGISTRY. IN THE ABSENCE OF THE SAME, THE APPEAL OF ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED IN LIMINE. 4 . IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED . ORDER PRONOUNCED ON THIS 26 TH DAY OF AUGUST , 201 6 . SD/ - (SUSHMA CHOWLA) / JUDICIAL MEMBER / PUNE ; DATED : 26 TH AUGUST , 201 6 . GCVSR / COPY OF THE ORDER IS FORWARDED TO : 1. / THE APPELLANT ; 2. / THE RESP ONDENT; 3. ( ) / THE CIT(A) - 1 , NASHIK ; 4. / THE PR. CIT 1 , NASHIK ; 5. 6. , , , - / DR SMC , ITAT, PUNE; / GUARD FILE . / BY ORDER , // TRUE COPY // / SR. PRIVATE SECRETARY , / ITAT, PUNE