IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD D BENCH BEFORE: SHR I RAJPAL YADAV , JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER THE DEPUTY CIT , CIRCLE - 2(1)(1 ), AHMEDABAD (APPELLANT) VS INDIA GELATINE & CHEMICAL LTD. 7 TH FLOOR, 703/604, SHILP BUILDING, NR. MUNICIPAL MARKET, C.G. ROAD, AHMEDABAD - 380006 PAN:AAACI3676F (RESPONDENT) REVENUE BY : S H RI /MS. SONIA KUMAR , SR. D . R. ASSESSEE BY: SHRI M.J. SHAH , A.R. DATE OF HEARING : 28 - 0 8 - 2 019 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 11 - 09 - 2 019 / ORD ER P ER : AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER : - THIS REVENUE S APPEAL FOR A. Y. 2011 - 12 , ARI SES FROM ORDER OF THE CIT(A) - 2, AHMEDABAD DATED 16 - 02 - 2 015 , IN PROCEEDINGS UNDER SECTION 143(3) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961; IN SHORT THE ACT . I T A NO . 1372 / A H D/20 15 A SS ESSMENT YEAR 2011 - 12 I.T.A NO. 1372 /AHD/20 15 A.Y. 2011 - 12 PAGE NO DY. CIT VS. INDIA GELATINE & CHEMICAL LTD. 2 2 . AT THE OUTSET, AFTER GOING THROUGH THE GROUNDS OF APPEAL AND THE IMPUGNED ORDERS OF THE REVENUE AUTHORITIES BELOW, A QUERY WAS RAISED BY THE BENCH AS TO APPLICABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE IN VIEW OF RECENT CBDT CIRCULAR NO. 17/2019 DATE D 08 - 08 - 2019 RESTRICTING THE FILLING OF THE APPEAL BY THE REVENUE WH ERE THE TAX EFFECT IS BELOW RS.5 0 LAKHS, THE LD. DR DID NOT DISPUTE THE SAME AND SUBMITTED THAT THE ISSUE IS LEFT TO THE TRIBUNAL TO BE DECIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW. 3 . WE FIND THA T THE APPEAL O F THE REVENUE IS PRESENTED ON 15.5.2015 . ON 8.8.2019 THE CBDT HAS ISSUED INSTR UCTIONS BEARING NO. 17 OF 2019 UNDER FILE N O. F. NO. F. NO. 279/MISC. 142/2007 - ITJ(PT.) PROHIBITING ITS SUBORDINATE AUTHORITIES FROM FILING OF THE APPEAL TO THE TR IBUNAL AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE CIT(A) WHERE THE TAX EFFECT BY VIRTUE OF THE RELIEF GIVEN BY THE CIT(A) IS LESS THAN RS.5 0 LAKHS. THE INSTRUCTIONS HAVE BEEN MADE APPLICABLE WITH RETROSPECTIVE EFFECT, MEANING THEREBY, THESE INSTRUCTIONS ARE APPLICABLE ON P ENDING APPEALS ALSO. IN THE PRESENT CASE, TAX EFFECT ON THE TOTAL INCOME ASSESSED MINUS THE TAX THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN CHARGEABLE HAD SUCH TOTAL INCOME BEEN REDUCED BY THE AMOUNT OF INCOME IN RESPECT OF THE ISSUE AGAINST WHICH AP PEAL IS FILED, IS LESS THA N RS.5 0 LAKHS. FURTHER, THE CASE OF THE REVENUE DOES NOT FALL WITHIN THE AMBIT OF EXCEPTIONS PROVIDED IN THE CIRCULAR. THUS, KEEPING IN VIEW THE ABOVE CBDT CIRCULAR AND PROVISIONS OF SECTION 268A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, WE ARE OF THE VIEW THAT THE PRESENT APPEAL OF THE REVENUE DESERVES TO BE DISMISSED. IT IS ACCORDINGLY DISMISSED. HOWEVER, IT IS OBSERVED THAT IN CASE ON RE - VERIFICATION AT THE END OF THE AO IT COMES TO THE NOTICE THAT THE TAX EFFECT IS MORE OR REVENUE S CASE FALLS WITHIN THE AMBIT OF EXCE PTIONS PROVIDED IN THE CIRCULAR, THEN THE DEPARTMENT WILL BE AT LIBERTY TO APPROACH THE TRIBUNAL FOR RECALL OF THIS ORDER. SUCH APPLICATION SHOULD BE FILED I.T.A NO. 1372 /AHD/20 15 A.Y. 2011 - 12 PAGE NO DY. CIT VS. INDIA GELATINE & CHEMICAL LTD. 3 WITHIN THE TIME PERIOD PRESCRIBED IN THE ACT. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE, THE APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS D ISMISSED DUE TO LOW TAX EFFECT. 4 . IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PR ONOUNCED IN THE OPEN C OURT O N 11 - 0 9 - 201 9 SD/ - SD/ - ( RAJPAL YADAV ) ( AMARJIT SINGH ) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AHMEDABAD : DATED 11 /0 9 /2019 / COPY OF ORDER FORWARDED TO: - 1. ASSESSEE 2. REVENUE 3. CONCERNED CIT 4. CIT (A) 5. DR, ITAT, AHMEDABAD 6. GUARD FILE. BY ORDER/ , / ,