IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH `A : NEW DELHI) BEFORE SHRI U.B.S. BEDI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI B.C. MEENA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NOS.1386 & 1387/DEL./2011 (ASSESSMENT YEAR : N.A.) AGGARWAL SAMAJ SANGTHAN (ROHINI) VS. DIT(E), POCKET M-F-22/64, (GROUND FLOOR) NEW DELHI. SECTOR 3, ROHINI, NEW DELHI. (PAN/GIR NO.AABAA5446J) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : NONE REVENUE BY : SHRI BHIM SINGH, SR.DR ORDER PER U.B.S. BEDI, JM THESE TWO APPEALS OF THE ASSESSEE EMANATE FROM TH E ORDER PASSED U/S 80G AND 12A OF THE I.T. ACT, 1961 BOTH DATED 17.1.2010. 2. DESPITE HAVING GOT ADJOURNED THE APPEAL FROM LAS T DATE OF HEARING TO 08.01.2013, ASSESSEE DID NOT APPEAR NOR APPLICATION FOR ADJOURN MENT HAS BEEN RECEIVED. THUS, IT IS INFERRED THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PRO SECUTION OF THE PRESENT APPEALS. 3. HAVING REGARD TO RULE 19(2) OF ITAT RULES, 1963 AND FOLLOWING VARIOUS DECISIONS OF THE TRIBUNAL INCLUDING IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. M ULTIPLAN INDIA (P) LTD., REPORTED IN 38 ITD 320 (DEL.) AND THE JUDGMENT OF HONBLE MADHYA P RADESH HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR VS. CWT, 223 I.T.R. 480 (MP), WE TREAT THE APPEALS OF THE ASSESSEE AS UNADMITTED AND DISMISS THEM. I.T.A. NOS.1386 & 1387/DEL./2011 (A.Y. : N.A.) 2 4. AS A RESULT, BOTH THE APPEALS FILED BY THE ASSE SSEE ARE DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT SOON AFTER THE CONC LUSION OF THE HEARING ON 08.01.2013. SD/- SD/- (B.C. MEENA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (U.B.S. BEDI ) JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED : JAN. 08, 2013 SKB COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO:- 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT(CONCERNED) 4. DIT(E), NEW DELHI. 5. CIT(ITAT) DEPUTY REGISTRAR, ITAT