IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCH “SMC”, PUNE BEFORE SHRI R.S. SYAL, VICE PRESIDENT आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No.1412/PUN/2019 नधा रण वष / Assessment Year : 2011-12 DCIT, Panvel Circle, Panvel Vs. M/s. Poornima Electricals, C/o. Crest Electronet, Second Floor, Phadke Marg, Honesty House, Plot No.198/2, MCCH Society, Panvel, Dist. Raigad – 410 206 PAN : AABFP4117G Appellant Respondent आदेश / ORDER PER R.S. SYAL, VP : This appeal by the Revenue is directed against the order passed by the ld. CIT(A)-5, Pune on 17-06-2019 in relation to the assessment year 2011-12. 2. At the outset, the ld. DR admitted that the tax effect in this case is less than Rs.50.00 lakh. 3. The CBDT has issued circular No.17/2019 dated 08-08-2019 revising upward the monetary limits for filing of appeals by the Department in Income-tax Cases before various Assessee by None Revenue by Shri Piyush Kumar Singh Yadav Date of hearing 28-06-2022 Date of pronouncement 28-06-2022 ITA No.1412/PUN/2019 M/s. Poornima Electricals 2 appellate forums. The earlier circular No.03/2018 dated 11-07-2018 fixed monetary limit for filing of appeals by the Revenue before the Tribunal at Rs.20.00 lakh. Such limit has now been enhanced in the Circular dated 08-08-2019 to Rs.50.00 lakh. Since tax effect in the instant appeal is less than the revised monetary limit of Rs.50.00 lakh, I am not inclined to entertain this appeal. 4. At this juncture, it is pertinent to note that the CBDT vide F.No.279/Misc/M-13/2018-ITJ dated 20-08-2019 has clarified that the revised monetary limits so mentioned in Circular No.17/2019 are applicable to all pending appeals. 5. As regards the contention of the ld. DR that the additions in this case were made on the basis of information received from the Sales tax department about the assessee indulging in bogus purchases and hence covered under the exception clause of 10(e) of the CBDT’s Instruction No.3/2018, dt. 11-07-2018 as assailed in the grounds of appeal, I find that such a contention has not been countenanced by the Pune Benches of the Tribunal in several cases including ITO vs. M/s Param Marketing (ITA No.1872/PUN/2019 dt.30-01-2020) and ITO vs. Yusuf ITA No.1412/PUN/2019 M/s. Poornima Electricals 3 Gulmmohmmed Patel (ITA No.1852/PUN/2019 dt.30-01-2020). Not only that, even the Miscellaneous application filed u/s 254(2) on this issue has also been dismissed in DCIT vs. M/s Rang Rasayan (M.A.No.60/PUN/2019 dt. 14-01-2020). No contrary view has been brought to my notice on behalf of the Revenue. Respectfully following the above precedent, I am not inclined to accept the contention of the Revenue. In view of the foregoing discussion, I dismiss the appeal filed by the Revenue. 6. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. Order pronounced in the Open Court on 28 th June, 2022. Sd/- (R.S.SYAL) उपा य / VICE PRESIDENT प ु णे Pune; दनांक Dated : 28 th June, 2022 Satish ITA No.1412/PUN/2019 M/s. Poornima Electricals 4 आदेश की ितिलिप अ ेिषत/Copy of the Order is forwarded to: 1. अपीलाथ / The Appellant; 2. 3. थ / The Respondent The CIT(A)-5, Pune 4. 5. The CIT concerned DR, ITAT, ‘SMC’ Bench, Pune 6. गाड फाईल / Guard file. आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, // True Copy // Senior Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ,पुणे / ITAT, Pune Date 1. Draft dictated on 28-06-2022 Sr.PS 2. Draft placed before author 28-06-2022 Sr.PS 3. Draft proposed & placed before the second member JM 4. Draft discussed/approved by Second Member. JM 5. Approved Draft comes to the Sr.PS/PS Sr.PS 6. Kept for pronouncement on Sr.PS 7. Date of uploading order Sr.PS 8. File sent to the Bench Clerk Sr.PS 9. Date on which file goes to the Head Clerk 10. Date on which file goes to the A.R. 11. Date of dispatch of Order. *