VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENC H A JAIPUR JH LAANHI XKSLKBZ] U;KF;D LNL; ,OA JH FOE FLAG ;KNO] YS[KK LNL; DS LE{K BEFORE: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SING H YADAV, AM VK;DJ VIHY LA- @ ITA NO. 1428/JP/2018 FU/KZKJ.K O'K Z @ ASSESSMENT YEAR :2014-15 SH. VENU GOPAL AGARWAL WARD NO. 39, MANTRI MARG, SABJI MANDI, CHURU CUKE VS. THE ACIT, CIRCLE JHUNJHUNU LFKK;H YS[KK LA-@THVKBZVKJ LA-@ PAN/GIR NO.: AAKPA 7217 P VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ L S@ ASSESSEE BY : SH. SURENDRA SHAH (CA) JKTLO DH VKSJ LS @ REVENUE BY : SH. BHAWAR SINGH (JCIT) LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[ K@ DATE OF HEARING : 23/09/2019 MN?KKS'K.KK DH RKJH[ K@ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 25/09/2019 VKNS'K@ ORDER PER: SANDEEP GOSAIN, J.M. THE PRESENT APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED BY THE ASSESSEE A GAINST THE ORDER OF CIT(A)-3, JAIPUR DATED 09.10.2018 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2014-15. THE GROUNDS TAKEN BY THE ASSESSEE ARE MENTIONED HEREINBELOW:- '1. THAT ON THE FACTS AND IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF T HE CASE THE ID. CIT(A)-111 . HAS GROSSLY ERRED IN FACTS AND IN LAW IN PASSING T HE IMPUGNED ORDER EX-PARTE WITHOUT GIVING A SUFFICIENT AND A PROPER OPPORTUNITY TO THE ASSESSEE TO BE HEARD.