D.D. International, V. DCIT, Central Cricle-1,

ITA 1483/DEL/2005

• Counselvise Citation: [2010] 135 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 7338 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 5 year(s) 4 month(s) 18 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 18-08-2010
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: B
• Next Hearing Date: 12-03-2013
• Assessment Year: 2001-2002
• Appeal Filed On: 30-03-2005
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: ANUSHA KHURANA

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH `I NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI A.D. JAIN AND SHRI R.C. SHARMA ITA NO. 1483(DEL)2005 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2001-2002 D.D. INTERNATIONAL, F-1/9, OKHLA INDUST.AREA, INCOME TAX OFFICER, PHASE I, NEW DELHI. V. WARD 22(4), N.DELHI. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY : MS. ANUSHA KHURANA, DR ORDER PER A.D. JAIN, J.M. THIS IS ASSESSEES APPEAL FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2000-01. 2. NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE DESPITE SENDING NOTICE FOR HEARING, WHICH HAS NOT RETURNED UNSERVED. THEREF ORE, CONSIDERING THE FACTS AND KEEPING IN MIND THE PROVISIONS OF RULE 19(2) OF THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL RULES, AS WERE CONSIDERED IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA LTD. REPORTED IN 38 ITD 320(DEL), WE TREAT THIS APPEAL AS UN-ADMITTED. THE ASSESSEE, IF SO ADVISED, SHALL BE FREE TO MOVE THIS TRIBUNAL PRAYING FOR RECALLING OF THIS ORDER AND EXPLAINING THE REASONS FOR NON- ITA 1483(DEL)05 2 COMPLIANCE ETC. AND IF THE BENCH IS SO SATISFIED AB OUT THE REASONS ETC., THEN THIS ORDER SHALL BE RECALLED. 3. IN THE RESULT, THE ASSESSEES APPEAL IS DISMISSE D. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 18.08.2010. SD/- SD/- (R.C. SHARMA) (A.D. JAIN) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL M EMBER DATED: 18.08.2010 *RM COPY FORWARDED TO: 1. APPELLANT. 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT(A) 4. CIT 5. DR TRUE COPY BY ORDER DEPUTY REGISTRAR .