, , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL C BENCH, CHENNAI , . ! , ' #$ BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & SHRI V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER ./ I.T.A. NO. 1495/MDS/2014 ( / ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2009-2010) M/S. MACMILLAN PUBLISHERS INDIA LIMITED, NO.21, PATTULLOS ROAD, CHENNAI 600 002. [PAN:AAFCM 5564R] ( %& /APPELLANT) VS THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COMPANY CIRCLE VI(1), CHENNAI ( '(%& /RESPONDENT) / APPELLANT BY : SHRI. S.P. CHIDAMBARAM, ADV / RESPONDENT BY : SHRI. PABHLAVETH PEERYA, CIT. /DATE OF HEARING : 21.05.2015 ! /DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 29.05.2015. ) / O R D E R PER CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER THIS APPEAL BY ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORD ER OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV, CHENNAI, DATED 21.03 .2014 U/S.263 OF THE ACT FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-2010. I.T.A.NO.1495/MDS/2014 :- 2 -: 2. AT THE TIME OF HEARING, THE LD. AUTHORISED REPRESEN TATIVE FOR ASSESSEE FILED A LETTER DATED 14.05.2015 STATING TH AT WHILE PASSING CONSEQUENTIAL ORDER TO THE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONE R OF INCOME TAX PASSED U/S.263 OF THE ACT, THE ASSESSING OFFICER HA S NOT MADE ANY ADDITION IN HIS ORDER DATED 31.03.2015 . ACCORDING TO THE LD. AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE FOR ASSESSEE, THE ASSESSEE HAS NO GR IEVANCE. HENCE, HE SOUGHT PERMISSION OF THE TRIBUNAL TO WITHDRAW THIS APPEAL. 3. WE ACCEDE TO THE REQUEST OF THE ASSESSEE COUNSEL TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL AND THIS APPEAL IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAW N. 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IN ITA NO.1495/MDS/2014 IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED ON FRIDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF MAY, 2015, AT CHENNAI. SD/- SD/- ( . ! ) V. DURGA RAO ' / JUDICIAL MEMBER ( ) (CHANDRA POOJARI) / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER '# /CHENNAI. $% /DATED:29.05.2015. KV %& '( )( /COPY TO: 1. * APPELLANT 2. / RESPONDENT 3. + ( )/CIT(A) 4. + /CIT 5. (,- . /DR 6. -/ 0 /GF. I.T.A.NO.1495/MDS/2014 :- 3 -: