PAGE | 1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL KOLKATA BENCH D, KOLKATA BEFORE SH. P.M.JAGTAP, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SH. S.S.GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO.1499/KOL/2017 [ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2012 - 13] APPELLANT BY NONE RESPONDENT BY SH. A.BHATTACHARJEE, ADDL. CIT DATE OF HEARING 26.07.2018 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 26.07.2018 ORDER PER P.M.JAGTAP, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF LD. CIT(A) - 12, KOLKATA DATED 31.03.2017 PASSED EX - PARTE WHEREBY HE DISMISSED THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE. 2. THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IN THIS CASE WAS INITIALLY FIXED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL ON 26.06.2018. NONE HOWEVER APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE ON THE SAID DATE. IN ORDER TO GIVE ONE MORE OPPORTUNITY TO THE ASSESSEE, THE HEARING WAS ADJOURNED TO 26.07.2018 WIT H THE DIRECTION TO THE REGISTRY TO SEND NOTICE OF THE SAID HEARING TO THE ASSESSEE AT THE ADDRESS GIVEN IN THE APPEAL MEMO BY RPAD. ON 26.07.2018 I.E. TODAY, NONE HAS APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE NOR ANY APPLICATION SEEKING ADJOURNMENT HAS BEEN FILED. EVEN THE NOTICE SENT TO THE ASSESSEE BY RPAD HAS COME BACK WITH REMARK ADDRESSEE MOVED. THE ASSESSEE THUS HAS NOT EVEN BOTHER ED TO INFORM ITS NEW ADDRESS IN ORDER TO ENABLE THE REGISTRY TO SERVE THE NOTICE OF HEARING. IT IS ALSO OBSERVED THAT THERE WAS A SIMILAR NON - COMPLIANCE ON THE PART OF THE ASSESSEE BEFORE THE LD.CIT(A) RESULTING M/S.KAMAYANI I NFRASTRUCTURE PVT.LTD., 5, NAWAB LANE, KOLKATA - 700007. PAN - AAECK4553B VS ITO, WARD - 9(4), P - 7, CHOWRINGHEE SQUARE, KOLKATA - 700069. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ITA NO. 14 99 / KOL/201 7 [ASSESSMENT YEAR: 20 12 - 13 ] PAGE | 2 INTO EX - PARTE ORDER PASSED BY LD.CIT(A). KEEPING IN VIEW THIS CASUAL, NON - COMPLIANT AND NON - COOPERATIVE ATTITUDE OF THE ASSESSEE, IT APPEARS THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT SERIOUSLY INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THIS A PPEAL FILED BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL. 3. THE LAW ASSISTS THOSE WHO ARE VIGILANT AND NOT THOSE WHO SLEEP OVER THEIR RIGHTS. THIS PRINCIPLE IS EMBODIED IN THE WELL KNOWN DICTUM VIGILANTIBUS, NON DORMIENTIBUS, JURA SUBVENIENT. CONSIDERING THE FACTS AND KEEPING IN MIND THE PROVISIONS OF RULE 19(2) OF THE ITAT RULES AS WAS CONSIDERED IN THE CASE OF CIT VS MULTIPLAN INDIA PVT. LTD. 38 ITD 320 (DEL) AND THE JUDGMENT OF THE HONBLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HALKAR VS C.W.T. RE PORTED IN 223 ITR 480, WE TREAT THIS APPEAL AS UNADMITTED AND DISMISS THE SAME FOR NON - PROSECUTION. 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED . ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 26.07.2018. S D / - S D / - (S.S.GODARA) (P.M.JAGTAP) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER DATE: - 26.07.2018 *AMIT KUMAR* ITA NO. 14 99 / KOL/201 7 [ASSESSMENT YEAR: 20 12 - 13 ] PAGE | 3 COPY FORWARDED TO: 1. APPELLANT - M/S. KAMAYANI INFRASTRUCTURE PVT.LTD., 5, NAWAB LANE, KOLKATA - 700007. 2. RESPONDENT - IT O , WARD - 9(4), P - 7, CHOWRINGHEE SQUARE, KOLKATA - 700 069. 3. CIT - KOLKATA 4. CIT(APPEALS) - KOLKATA BENCH 5. DR: ITAT - KOLKATA SR.P.S./H.O.O ITAT, KOLKATA