V T RAMESH, VELLORE V. ITO WARD II, VELLORE

ITA 1500/CHNY/2018

• Counselvise Citation: [2019] 118 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 6443 (ITAT-CHENNAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 8 month(s) 7 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 09-01-2019
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: C
• Assessment Year: 2012-2013
• Appeal Filed On: 02-05-2018
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: SAILENDRA MAMIDIPCIT

Judgement Text

, , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL C BENCH, CHENNAI . . . , ! ' , $ '% BEFORE SHRI N.R.S. GANESAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ./ ITA NO.1500/CHNY/2018 ( )( / ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2012-13 SHRI V.T. RAMESH, PROP: CONTRACT WORK ON FEETING, NO.1/48-D, THIRUVALLUVAR STREET, VILLARI VILLAGE, THIMIRI POST, ARCOT TALUK, VELLORE DISTRICT, TAMILNADU 632 512 PAN : ADNPV 3098 B V. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD II VELLORE, VELLORE RANGE, VELLORE, NO.2, BARRACKS CROSS STREET, OFFICERS LINE, VELLORE, VELLORE DISTRICT, TAMILNADU 632 001. (+,/ APPELLANT) (-.+,/ RESPONDENT) +, / 0 / APPELLANT BY : NONE -.+, / 0 / RESPONDENT BY : SHRI SAILENDRA MAMIDI, PCIT 1 / 2$ / DATE OF HEARING : 09.01.2019 34) / 2$ / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 09.01.2019 / O R D E R PER N.R.S. GANESAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER : THE ASSESSEE HAS FILED THE PRESENT APPEAL CHALLEN GING THE CORRECTNESS OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL CO MMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-8, CHENNAI, UNDER SECTION 264 OF THE INC OME-TAX ACT, 1961 (IN SHORT 'THE ACT'). 2 I.T.A. NO.1500/CHNY/18 2. IN FACT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE WAS POSTED F OR HEARING ON 08.01.2019. SHRI B.R. CHANDARASEKAR, THE LD.COUNSE L FOR THE ASSESSEE APPEARED. IT WAS BROUGHT TO HIS NOTICE BY THE BENCH THAT THE APPEAL IS NOT MAINTAINABLE BEFORE THIS TRIBUNAL AGAINST THE ORDER PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX UNDER SECTION 264 OF THE ACT. THE LD.COUNSEL, IN FACT, TOOK TIME . ACCORDINGLY, THE APPEAL WAS POSTED TODAY, I.E., ON 09.01.2019. THE ASSESSEE FILED AN APPLICATION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL. THE LD. DEP ARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE HAD NO OBJECTION TO DISMISS THE APPE AL AS WITHDRAWN. 3. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE FACTUAL SITUATION, THE APPE AL IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 9 TH JANUARY, 2019 AT CHENNAI. SD/- SD/- ( ! ' ) ( . . . ) (INTURI RAMA RAO) (N.R.S. GANESAN) $ / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER /JUDICIAL MEMBER /CHENNAI, 6 /DATED, THE 9 TH JANUARY, 2019. KRI. 3 I.T.A. NO.1500/CHNY/18 / -278 98)2 /COPY TO: 1. +, /APPELLANT 2. -.+, /RESPONDENT 3. PCIT-8, CHENNAI 5. 8: -2 /DR 6. ;( < /GF.