, , , , , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT AHMEDABAD, A BENCH . .. . . .. . , !'# !'# !'# !'#, , , , $ $ $ $ . .. . . .. .%&' %&' %&' %&', , , , %( ) %( ) %( ) %( ) % # % # % # % # BEFORE S/SHRI G.C. GUPTA, VICE-PRESIDENT AND A. L. GEHLOT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) ITA NO.1536/AHD/2008 [ASSTT.YEAR : 2001-2002] DIAMOND PROJECTS PVT. LTD. D-7, BIDC, GORWA BARODA. /VS. ITO, WARD-1(2) BARODA. ( (( (+, +, +, +, / APPELLANT) ( (( (-.+, -.+, -.+, -.+, / RESPONDENT) /' 0 1 %/ ASSESSEE BY : NONE ) 0 1 %/ REVENUE BY : SHRI G.S.SOURYAVANSHI 3 0 '4(/ DATE OF HEARING : 12 TH JANUARY, 2012 5&6 0 '4(/ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 03-02-2012 %7 / O R D E R PER G.C. GUPTA, VICE-PRESIDENT: THIS APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE FOR A.Y.2001-2002 IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (APPEALS)-V, BARODA. 2. AT THE TIME OF HEARING, NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. IT IS OBSERVED THAT THE CASE WAS GETTING ADJOURNED FROM T IME TO TIME AT THE REQUEST OF THE ASSESSEES COUNSEL. TO BE SPECIFIC, THE CASE W AS ADJOURNED ON 13-9-2010, 28-10-2010, 27-12-2010 AND 20-10-2011 AT THE ASSESS EES COUNSEL. TODAY ALSO NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. THE ASSES SEE HAS NOT FILED ANY APPLICATION FOR NON-APPEARANCE IN THE MATTER. IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES, IT IS INFERRED THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PUR SING ITS APPEAL. THEREFORE, FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF DELHI BENCH IN THE CASE OF MULTIPLAN (INDIA) LTD. 38 ITD 320, WE DISMISS THE APPEAL OF T HE ASSESSEE IN LIMINE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. 3. IN THE RESULT, THE ASSESSEES APPEAL IS DISMISSE D. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT ON THE DATE MENTIONE D HEREINABOVE. SD/- SD/- ( . .. . . .. .%&' %&' %&' %&' /A.L. GEHLOT) %( ) /ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ( . .. . . .. . /G.C. GUPTA) !'# !'# !'# !'# /VICE-PRESIDENT