Appeal details
Counselvise Citation
[2023] 102 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 3100 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
Assessee PAN
Bench
Appeal Number
Duration Of Justice
2 month(s) 21 day(s)
Appellant
Respondent
Appeal Type
Income Tax Appeal
Pronouncement Date
24-07-2023
Appeal Filed By
Department
Order Result
Dismissed
Bench Allotted
H
Next Hearing Date
12-07-2023
Assessment Year
misc
Appeal Filed On
03-05-2023
Judgement Text
1 ITA 1536/Mum/2023 & 1538/Mum/2023 M/s Knight Riders Sports Pvt Ltd IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “H”, MUMBAI BEFORE VIKAS AWASTHY (JUDICIAL MEMBER) AND MS. PADMAVATHY S. (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) I.T.A. No.1536/Mum/2023 -A.Y. 2011-12 I.T.A. No.1538/Mum/2023 -A.Y. 2012-13 The Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, CC-4(2), Central Range- 4, Mumbai, Room No.1921, 19 th Floor, Air India Building, Nariman Point, Mumbai-400 021 vs M/s Knight Riders Sports Pvt Ltd, 8 th Floor, Backstage, Plot No.612, 15 th Crossroad, Junction of Ramkrishna Mission Road, Santacruz (W), Mumbai-400 054 PAN:AADCK3118M APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee represented by Shri Hiten Chande Department represented by Smt.Madhumalti Ghosh,CIT,DR Date of hearing 13-07-2023 Date of pronouncement 25-07-2023 O R D E R PER : MS PADMAVATHY S. (AM) These appeals of the revenue are against the separate orders of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-52, Mumbai (in short, ‘the CIT(A)’) both dated 02/02/2023 for A.Ys. 2011-12 and 2012-13 deleting the penalty levied under section 271(1)(c) vide order dated 29/03/2017 passed by the DCIT, Cent.Cir.4(2). 2 ITA 1536/Mum/2023 & 1538/Mum/2023 M/s Knight Riders Sports Pvt Ltd 3. The assessee is a 100% subsidiary of Red Chillies Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. The objects of the assessee company amongst others, includes setting up, buying, selling, acquiring, managing, running, operating on outright or in joint-venture or under franchisee or in partnership or under any kind of contract or arrangement for sharing of profits of sports team and sport players, setting up, managing and operating sports academy, promoting developing and managing sports talent, etc. The assessee filed the return of income for A.Y. 2011-12 on 28/09/2011 declaring a total loss of Rs.11,04,28,232/-. The return for A.Y. 2012-13 was filed on 28/09/2012 declaring total income at Nil. The Assessing Officer while completing the assessment under section 143(3) made the following disallowances which were upheld by the CIT(A) - i. Disallowance of Franchise fees treating it as capital in nature and after allowing depreciation @ 25% ii. Disallowance of Air fare and travelling expenses iii. Disallowance of website design charges treating it as capital in nature after allowing depreciation @60% iv. Disallowance Lodging & Boarding / food and catering charges 4. Subsequently, the Assessing Officer initiated penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) for the reason that the assessee has furnished inaccurate particulars. The Assessing Officer held that the CIT(A) in the quantum appeal has upheld the additions / disallowances and, therefore, the provisions of section 271(1)(c) are clearly applicable to the assessee. Accordingly, the Assessing Officer levied a penalty at 100% of tax sought to be evaded to the tune of Rs.4,42,44,913/- for A.Y. 2011-12 and Rs.3,53,05,323/- for A.Y. 2012-13. Aggrieved, the assessee preferred appeal before the CIT(A). The CIT(A) deleted the entire penalty levied by the Assessing Officer for both the assessment years. The CIT(A) while deleting the penalty considered the relief given by the 3 ITA 1536/Mum/2023 & 1538/Mum/2023 M/s Knight Riders Sports Pvt Ltd coordinate bench of the Tribunal in the quantum appeal vide order dated 30.06.2020 for AY 2011-12 (ITA No.4389/Mum/2015) and the order giving effect (OGE) dated 08.03.2022 passed by the Assessing Officer. Aggrieved, the Revenue is in appeal before the Tribunal. 5. The Ld.DR submitted that the department is in appeal before the High Court against the relief given by the Tribunal in the quantum appeal. The Ld.DR further submitted that there are contrary views taken by different benches of the Tribunal regarding the treatment of Franchise Fees and reference under section 255(3) for constitution of Special Bench is made before Hon’ble President in the matter of Role Model Support Pvt Ltd vs ACIT in ITA No.3602/Mum/2014. Therefore, it is contended by the ld DR that issues in the quantum appeal have not reached finality and that the penalty proceedings should be kept alive accordingly. 6. The Ld.AR, on the other hand, submitted that the co-ordinate bench has decided the quantum appeal in favour of the assessee and as of now, the same is binding. The Ld.AR further submitted that it is the settled issue that when the additions or disallowances are deleted in the quantum appeal, the penalty proceedings would not survive. Therefore, the Ld.AR prayed that the CIT(A) has correctly deleted the penalty. 7. We heard the parties and perused the material on record. We notice that the co-ordinate bench in assessee’s own case (supra) has deleted the quantum addition with respect to Franchise Fees and the issues pertaining to disallowance of air fare, travelling expenses, website charges, Lodging & Boarding / food and catering 4 ITA 1536/Mum/2023 & 1538/Mum/2023 M/s Knight Riders Sports Pvt Ltd charges have been remitted back to the Assessing Officer for a de-novo adjudication. It is further noticed that the Assessing Officer, in the OGE has deleted major part of the disallowances. In the present case the CIT(A) considered the order of the Tribunal and OGE of the Assessing Officer and deleted the penalty levied under section 271(1)(c) of the Act. It is settled position that when the additions made in the assessment order, on the basis of which penalty for furnishing inaccurate particulars is levied, are deleted, there remains no basis at all for levying the penalty. Accordingly no penalty can survive and the same is liable to be cancelled as in the given case. With regard to the petition for constitution of Special Bench in our considered view until the constitution and pronouncement of the decision of the Special Bench, the decision of the coordinate bench in the quantum appeal is binding on us. In view of these discussions and considering the facts of the present case, we hold that the penalty levied is not sustainable. Therefore, we see no reason to interfere with the decision of the CIT(A). and the appeal of the Revenue for AY 2011-12 is dismissed. 8. For AY 2012-13, the CIT(A) deleted the penalty after taking into consideration the decision of coordinate bench vide order dated 10.11.2020 (ITA No.6675/Mum/2016) and the OGE of the Assessing Officer dated 08.03.2022 through which the disallowances made are deleted. We have, while adjudicating the appeal for AY 2011-12, already held that when the additions are deleted in the quantum appeal the penalty levied on the same cannot survive. The facts for 2012- 13 being identical, our decision in assessee's own case for AY 2011-12 is mutatis mudandis applicable to the year under consideration also. Accordingly the decision 5 ITA 1536/Mum/2023 & 1538/Mum/2023 M/s Knight Riders Sports Pvt Ltd of the CIT(A) to delete the penalty for AY 2012-13 is upheld and the revenue's appeal is dismissed 9. In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed. Order pronounced in the open court on 25/07/2023. Sd/- sd/- (VIKAS AWASTHY) (PADMAVATHY S) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Mumbai, Dt : 25 th July, 2023 Pavanan प्रतितिति अग्रेतििCopy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अिीिार्थी/The Appellant , 2. प्रतिवादी/ The Respondent. 3. आयकर आयुक्त CIT 4. तवभागीय प्रतितिति, आय.अिी.अति., मुबंई/DR, ITAT, Mumbai 6. गार्ड फाइि/Guard file. BY ORDER, //True Copy// Asstt. Registrar / Senior Private Secretary ITAT, Mumbai
AI Insights
The case involves appeals by the Revenue against the decisions of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) which deleted the penalties imposed on M/s Knight Riders Sports Pvt Ltd for the assessment years 2011-12 and 2012-13. The penalties were initially levied by the Assessing Officer under section 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars, following disallowances made during the assessments. However, the CIT(A) deleted these penalties after considering the Tribunal's decisions in the quantum appeals, which had deleted the relevant additions and disallowances. The Tribunal's decision was based on the principle that if the additions or disallowances are removed, the foundation for the penalty also disappears.
