Rinki Tyagi (L/H) of Omender Tyagi, New Delhi V. ITO WARD - 2(1), Ghaziabad

ITA 1545/DEL/2020

• Counselvise Citation: [2022] 103 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 9136 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s) 1 month(s) 28 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 01-11-2022
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: E
• Next Hearing Date: 01-11-2022
• Assessment Year: 2009-2010
• Appeal Filed On: 03-09-2020
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL

Judgement Text

1 ITA no. 1545/Del/2020 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “E”: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI NARENDRA KUMAR BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI KUL BHARAT, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No. 1545/DEL/2020 [Assessment Year: 2009-10 Rinki Tyagi (L/H) of Omender Tyagi, C/o S.K. Gambhir, Advocate, 429, (5 th Floor), Jagriti Enclave, New Delhi-110092 PAN:AATPO7014P Vs Income-tax Officer, Ward-2(1), Ghaziabad. APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee represented by Sh. C.S. Anand, Adv. Department represented by Sh. Jeetender Chand, Sr. DR DR Date of hearing 02.11.2022 Date of pronouncement 02.11.2022 O R D E R PER KUL BHARAT, JM: This appeal, by the assessee, is directed against the order of the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Aligarh, dated 08.02.2016, pertaining to the assessment year 2009-10. 2. At the outset learned counsel for the assessee submitted that the assessee is the legal heir of Shri Omender Tyagi. He contended that appeal filed by Shri Omender Tyagi was decided by the Tribunal vide order dated 18.08.2021 in ITA no. 5219/Del/2017. The assessee has also filed misc. application seeking rectification in the title as in the title name of Shri Omender Tyagi is written and Shri Omender Tyagi had expired during the pendency of the appeal. He submitted that since the misc. application is pending adjudication and there is every likelihood of rectification of the mistake the present appeal would not survive. He contended that Shri Omender Tyagi died on 21.11.2017. 2 ITA no. 1545/Del/2020 On the other hand, ld. DR stated that he has no objection if the appeal is permitted to be withdrawn. 3. We have heard the learned representatives of the parties. Since the assessee has filed misc. application for rectification of mistake, the present appeal would not survive and hence dismissed as withdrawn. 4. Assessee’s appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in open court on 2 nd Nov. 2022. Sd/- Sd/- (NARENDRA KUMAR BILLAIYA) (KUL BHARAT) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER *MP* Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(Appeals) 5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT, NEW DELHI