, .. , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , SMC A BENCH, CHENNAI . , BEFORE SHRI A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ./ I.T.A.NO.1594/MDS/2015 ( / ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2005-06) SMT. S. KANNAGI, FLAT NO.3, MID TOWN APARTMENTS, NO.326, TTK ROAD, ALWARPET, CHENNAI 600 018. VS THE ACIT, CIRCLE XV, CHENNAI PAN: AHGPK1838H ( /APPELLANT) ( /RESPONDENT) / APPELLANT BY : NONE /RESPONDENT BY : SHRI SAGADEVAN, JCIT /DATE OF HEARING : 04.07.2017 !' /DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 04.07.2017 / O R D E R THIS APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER PASSED BY THE LD. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEA LS)-4, CHENNAI DATED 26.03.2015 IN ITA NO.16/13-14 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2005-06 PASSED U/S.250(6) R.W.S.143(3) OF THE ACT. 2. ON THE EARLIER OCCASION DATED 24.04.2017 THE L D. AR HAD SOUGHT ADJOURNMENT VIDE HER LETTER DATED 18.04.2017 AND THE SAME WAS GRANTED. FURTHER BOTH THE PARTIES WERE INTIMAT ED IN THE OPEN COURT REGARDING THE NEXT DATE OF HEARING WHICH WAS FIXED ON 04.07.2017. HOWEVER, ON THE SAID DATE, NONE APPEARE D ON BEHALF 2 ITA NO.1594/MDS/2015 OF THE ASSESSEE, NOR ANY REQUEST FOR ADJOURNMENT WA S FILED BY THE LD. AR. 3. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE, IM OF THE CONSIDERED OP INION THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PURSUING THE APPEAL F ILED BEFORE THIS TRIBUNAL. HENCE, FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF THE DEL HI BENCH IN THE CASE OF CIT V. MULTIPLAN INDIA P. LTD., REPORTED IN 38 ITD 320 AND THE JUDGMENT OF THE HON'BLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COU RT IN THE CASE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR (223 ITR 480), I DISM ISS THE APPEAL IN LIMINE. THE REGISTRY IS HEREBY DIRECTED TO DISPA TCH THIS ORDER TO THE ASSESSEE WITHIN A PERIOD OF 7 DAYS FROM THIS DA Y. 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON THE 04 TH JULY, 2017. SD/- ( . ) (A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY) / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER #$ /CHENNAI, %& /DATED 04 TH JULY, 2017 JR & () *) /COPY TO: 1. /APPELLANT 2. /RESPONDENT 3. - ( )/CIT(A) 4. - /CIT 5. )./ 0 /DR 6. /1 /GF