IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DIVISION BENCH, CHANDIGARH BEFORE SHRI N.K. SAINI, VICE PRESIDENT & SHRI R.L NEGI, JUDICIAL MEMBER ./ ITA NO. 1610/CHD/2018 / ASSESSMENT YEAR :2009-10 SHREE TRIVENI FOODS, NH-22, SECTOR 6, PARWANOO, DISTT. SOLAN-173220 (HP) THE ITO, PARWANOO, DISTT. SOLAN (HP) ./PAN NO: AANFS4378J / APPELLANT /RESPONDENT HEARING THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING ! /ASSESSEE BY : SHRI SURINDER BABBAR, CA ' ! / REVENUE BY : SHRI ASHOK KHANNA, ADDL. CIT # $ % /DATE OF HEARING : 28.01.2021 &'() % / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 28.01.2021 / ORDER PER R.L. NEGI, JUDICIAL MEMBER: THE ASSESSEE HAS FILED THE CAPTIONED APPEAL AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 30.11.2018 PASSED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) SHIMLA [(FOR SHORT THE CIT(A)], PERTAINING TO THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009- 10 VIDE WHICH THE LD. CIT(A) HAS DISMISSED THE APPE AL OF THE ASSESSEE FILED AGAINST THE ASSESSMENT ORDER PASSED U/S 143(3 ) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 (FOR SHORT 'THE ACT'). 2. AT THE OUTSET, LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE SUB MITTED THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS OPTED TO SETTLE THE ISSUES IN THE SAID APPEALS UNDER THE 2 PROVISIONS OF VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME 2020. THE L D. COUNSEL FURTHER SUBMITTED THAT AN APPLICATION FOR WITHDRAWA L OF THE SAID APPEAL HAS ALREADY BEEN FILED. HENCE, THE SAME MAY BE ALLOWED AND THE ASSESSEE MAY BE PERMITTED TO THE WITHDRAW THE SAID APPEAL. 3. THE LD. DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE DID NOT OPP OSE THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE ASSESSEE. 4. IN VIEW OF THE SUBMISSIONS MADE BY THE LD. COUN SEL FOR THE ASSESSEE, WE ALLOW THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE ASS ESSEE AND ACCORDINGLY DISMISS THE APPEAL AS WITHDRAWN. ORDER PRONOUNCED ON 28.01.2021. SD/- SD/- ( N.K. SAINI) (R.L.NEGI) / VICE PRESIDENT / JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED : 28.01.2021 .. '+ ,-.- / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. / THE APPELLANT 2. / THE RESPONDENT 3. # / / CIT 4. # / ( )/ THE CIT(A) 5. -01 2 , %2 , 34516 / DR, ITAT, CHANDIGARH 6. 157$ / GUARD FILE '+ # / BY ORDER, 8 ' / ASSISTANT REGISTRAR