Ravi Prakash Khemka, CHENNAI V. ACIT, CHENNAI

ITA 1611/CHNY/2013

• Counselvise Citation: [2015] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 90766 (ITAT-CHENNAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 31-07-2015
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Bench Allotted: B
• Next Hearing Date: 27-07-2015
• Assessment Year: 1995-1996
• Appeal Filed On: 31-07-2013
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: S DASGUPTA

Judgement Text

, , IN THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL B BENCH, CHE NNAI . , . !' !' !' !' , # # # # $ $ $ $ BEFORE SHRI A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & SHRI V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER ./ I.T.A.NO.1611/MDS/2013 # ' %' / ASSESSMENT YEAR :1995-96 MR. RAVI PRAKASH KHEMKA, NO. 36, WALLAJAH ROAD, CHENNAI 600 002. [PAN: AAFPR1962H] VS. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COMPANY CIRCLE IV(4), CHENNAI. ( &' &' &' &' /APPELLANT ) ( ()&' ()&' ()&' ()&' / RESPONDENT ) &' * + / APPELLANT BY : NONE ()&' * + / RESPONDENT BY : SHRI S. DASGUPTA, JCIT * , / DATE OF HEARING : 27.07.2015 -% * , /DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 31.07.2015 . . . . / O R D E R PER V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER : THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAIN ST THE ORDER OF THE LD. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) II, COIMBA TORE, DATED 25.06.2013 RELEVANT TO THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 1995-96. 2. THE APPEAL WAS INITIALLY POSTED FOR HEARING ON 22.10.2013 AND AT THE REQUEST OF THE LD. AR, THE HEARING OF THE APPEAL WA S ADJOURNED TILL 27.07.2015. WHEN THE APPEAL WAS TAKEN UP FOR HEARIN G ON 27.07.2015, NONE I.T.A. I.T.A. I.T.A. I.T.A. NO NONO NO. .. .1611 1611 1611 1611/M/ /M/ /M/ /M/1 11 13 33 3 2 APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE OR ANY ADJOURNME NT REQUEST HAS BEEN FILED BY THE ASSESSEE. HENCE, IT IS INFERRED THAT T HE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THE APPEAL. 3. THEREFORE, HAVING REGARD TO RULE 19(2) OF ITAT RULES AND FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF THE DELHI BENCH OF THE TRIBUNAL IN THE CASE OF MULTIPLAN (INDIA) LTD. (38 ITD 320) AND THE JUDGMENT OF THE H ONBLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR (22 3 ITR 480), THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED ON FRIDAY, THE 31 ST OF JULY, 2015 AT CHENNAI. SD/- SD/- (A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (V. DURGA RAO) JUDICIAL MEMBER CHENNAI, DATED, THE 31.07.2015 VM/- . * (#,/0 10%, /COPY TO: 1. &' / APPELLANT, 2. ()&' / RESPONDENT, 3. 2 ( ) /CIT(A), 4. 2 /CIT, 5. 03! (#,# /DR & 6. !4' 5 /GF.