, , , , , , ,, , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL C BENCH : KOLKATA [ . . . . . .. . , , ! ! ! ! , ] [BEFORE HONBLE SHRI S.V. MEHROTRA, AM & HONBLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, JM !' !' !' !' / I.T.A NO. 1737/KOL/2010 #$ %& #$ %& #$ %& #$ %&/ // / ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2007-08 HOOR JAHAN - VS.- INCOME TAX OFFICER/WARD- 3 2(3) KOLKATA [PAN : ACTPJ 3032 C] KOLKATA. [ () () () () /APPELLANT ] ]] ] [ +,() +,() +,() +,()/ // / RESPONDENT ] ]] ] () () () () / FOR THE APPELLANT : NONE +,() +,() +,() +,() / FOR THE RESPONDENT : SHRI B.R. PURAKAYASTH A - / ORDER . . . . . .. . , PER S. V. MEHROTRA, A. M. THE ASSESSEE HAS FILED THIS APPEAL FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2007-08 AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE LD. CIT(A)-XIX, KOLKATA DATED 21.06.2010. 2. THIS APPEAL WAS FIXED FOR HEARING EARLIER ON 15. 11.2010, 17.01.2011 & 02.05.2011 BUT THE CASE WAS ADJOURNED EITHER ON REQUEST OF BOTH ASSESSEE AN D DEPARTMENT OR DUE TO NON-FUNCTIONING OF THE BENCH AND FINALLY ADJOURNED TO 26.07.2011. HOWEVER, NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE NOR ANY ADJOURNMENT PETITION WAS MOVED. WE, THEREFORE, INFE R THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED TO PROSECUTE THE APPEAL. 3. CONSIDERING THE FACTS AND KEEPING IN MIND THE DE CISION IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA PVT. LTD., 38 ITD 320, WE DISMISS THE APPEAL OF THE ASS ESSEE IN LIMINE. 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DIS MISSED IN LIMINE. - - - - . . . . / .# 0 1 / .# 0 1 / .# 0 1 / .# 0 1 2 2 2 2 ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE COURT ON 26.07. 2011. SD/- SD/- [ ! , ] [ .. , ] [ MAHAVIR SINGH ] [ S.V. MEHROTRA ] JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ( (( (2 2 2 2) )) ) DATED : 26.07.2011. ITA NO. 1737/KOL/20 10 2 - 5 + 6 76%/ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. () /APPELLANT- HOOR JAHAN, 7/1A, TILJALA PLACE, KOLKA TA-700 017. 2 +,() / RESPONDENT : INCOME TAX OFFICER/WARD-32(3), 10 MI DDLETON ROW, KOLKATA-700 071. 3. -#/ THE CIT, 4. -# ()/ THE CIT(A), KOLKATA. 5. 0 + #/ DR, KOLKATA BENCHES, KOLKATA [,6 + / TRUE COPY ] -#./ BY ORDER , !> /ASSTT REGISTRAR [KKC ?@ #A> B /SR.PS]