Shri Niraj Rajkumar Singh, Surat V. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-6(3), Surat

ITA 178/AHD/2014

• Counselvise Citation: [2016] 132 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 0035 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s) 9 month(s) 24 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 11-11-2016
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Next Hearing Date: 11-11-2016
• Assessment Year: 2010-2011
• Appeal Filed On: 17-01-2014
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: ANTONY PARIATH

Judgement Text

, , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL SMC BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER ./ ITA.NO.178/AHD/2014 / ASSTT. YEAR: 2010-2011 SHRI NIRAJ RAJKUMAR SINGH PROP. OF R.K. ROAD CARRIER 5, MAHAVIR NAGAR SOCIETY PUNAGAM, SURAT 395 010. PAN : BCZPS 9811 D VS ITO, WARD - 6(3) AHMEDABAD. ! / (APPELLANT) '# ! / (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : NONE REVENUE BY : SHRI ANTONY PARIATH, SR.DR / DATE OF HEARING : 11/11/2016 / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 11/11/2016 $%/ O R D E R ASSESSEE IS APPEAL BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL AGAINST THE ORDER OF LD.CIT(A)-I, SURAT DATED 12.11.2013 PASSED FOR THE ASSTT.YEAR 20 10-11. 2. AT THE TIME OF HEARING NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF O F THE ASSESSEE. NOTICE OF HEARING WAS SENT THROUGH RPAD POST, AND THE SAME WAS DULY SERVED AS POSTAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT SLIP HAS BEEN PLACED ON RECOR D. THE ASSESSEE HAS NOT FILED ANY APPLICATION FOR ADJOURNMENT OF THE CASE. THEREFORE, IT IS PRESUMED THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PURSUING WIT H HIS APPEAL BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL, THEREFORE, FOLLOWING ORDER OF THE ITAT, D ELHI BENCH IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA PVT. LTD., 38 ITD 320 (DELH I), I DISMISS THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IN LIMINE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. 3. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISS ED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE COURT ON 11 TH NOVEMBER, 2016 AT AHMEDABAD. SD/- (RAJPAL YADAV) JUDICIAL MEMBER AHMEDABAD; DATED 11/11/2016