IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCH A, HYDERABAD BEFORE SHRI P.M. JAGTAP, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO. 1826/HYD/2014 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2009-10 G. CHANDRASEKHAR, CHITTOOR PAN AFOPL 1100 L VS. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD 1, CHITTOOR. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : NONE REVENUE BY : SHRI RAMAKRISHNA BANDI DATE OF HEARING 20-04-2015 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 20-04-2015 O R D E R PER SAKTIJIT DEY, J.M.: THIS APPEAL FILED BY ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 27/08/2014 OF LD. CIT(A), GUNTUR FOR THE ASS ESSMENT YEAR 2009-10. 2. AS CAN BE SEEN FROM RECORD, APPEAL FILED BY ASSE SSEE SUFFERS FROM VARIOUS DEFECTS INCLUDING DELAY OF 79 DAYS. K NOWING FULLY WELL THAT THERE IS DELAY IN FILING THE APPEAL, ASSESSEE HAS NOT FILED ANY DELAY CONDONATION PETITION EXPLAINING CAUSE OF DELA Y. THOUGH, REGISTRY HAS ISSUED A NOTICE TO THE ASSESSEE, IN THE ADDRESS MENTIONED IN COLUMN NO. 10 OF APPEAL MEMO, FOR REMOVAL OF DEFECT AS WELL AS INTIMATING THE FIXATION OF DATE OF HEARING ON 20/04 /2015, BUT, WHEN THE APPEAL WAS CALLED FOR HEARING TODAY NO ONE WAS PRES ENT FOR ASSESSEE. THESE FACTS NOT ONLY INDICATE THE CARELESS ATTITUDE OF THE ASSESSEE BUT ALSO SHOW THAT HE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PURSUING THE APPEAL. 2 ITA NO. 1826/HYD/2014 G. CHANDRASEKHAR 3. IN THE AFORESAID FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES, THE AP PEAL FILED BY ASSESSEE BEING DEFECTIVE IS DISMISSED IN LIMINE WIT HOUT BEING ADMITTED. 4. IN THE RESULT, ASSESSEES APPEAL IS DISMISSED. PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 20 TH APRIL, 2015 UPON CONCLUSION OF HEARING. SD/- SD/- (P.M. JAGTAP) (SAK TIJIT DEY) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIA L MEMBER HYDERABAD, DATED: 20 TH APRIL, 2015 KV COPY TO:- 1) SRI G. CHANDRASEKHAR, C/O M/S K.G.M. GUPTA & CO ., CAS., 10/67, GANDHI ROAD, CHITTOOR 517 001. 2) ITO, WARD 1, GANDHI ROAD, CHITTOOR 3 CIT(A), GUNTUR 4)CIT, TIRUPATHI 5) THE DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE, I.T.A.T., HYDE RABAD.