IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD S M C BENCH, HYDERABAD. BEFORE S MT. P. MADHAVI DEVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER SL. NO., ITA NO. & ASST. YEAR APPELLANT RESPONDENT ASSESSEES REPRESENTATIVE 1 . 183 /HYD/201 9 20 15 - 16 NIRMALA DEVI MUNDHRA, 15 - 2 - 458 TO 460, 2 ND FLOOR, KUSUM COMMERCIAL COMPLEX, KISHANGUNJ, HYDERABAD - 500 012 PAN ACQPM 1847D INCOME TAX OFFICER , WARD 7(3 ), HYDERAB AD. SHRI LAKSHMINIWAS SHARMA. 2. 1 87 /HYD/2019 20 1 5 - 16 MUNDHRA JAGDISH PRASAD (HUF), D.NO.15 - 2 - 458 TO 460, 2 ND FLOOR, KUSUM COMMERCIAL COMPLEX, KISHANGUNJ, HYDERABAD - 500 012 PAN AAHHM 8275N INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 7 ( 3 ), HYDERABAD. SHRI LAKSHMINIWAS SHARMA. 3 . 1 84 /HYD/2019 2015 - 16 CHANCHAL MUNDHRA, 2 ND FLOOR, KUSUM COMMERCIAL COMPLEX, KISHANGUNJ, HYDERABAD - 500 012 PAN ATLPM 3500D INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 7(3) , HYDERAB A D. - DO - 4 . 186 /HYD/201 9 20 15 - 16 JAGDISH PRASAD MUNDHRA, 15 - 2 - 458/460, 2 ND FLOOR, KUSUM COMMERCIAL COMPLEX, KISHANGUNJ, HYDERABA D - 500 012 PAN ABMPM 7213N INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 7(3), HYDERABAD. - DO - 5 . 775 /HYD/201 9 20 14 - 15 JAGDISH PRASAD MUNDHRA, 15 - 2 - 458/460, 2 ND FLOOR, KUSUM COMMERCIAL COMPLEX, KISHANGUNJ, HYDERABAD - 500 012 PAN A BMPM 7213N INCOME TAX OFFICER , WARD 7(3) , HYDERABAD. - DO - RESPONDENT BY : SHRI E. SRIDHAR (D.R) D ATE OF HEARING : 19.04 .2021 . DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 19.04 . 2021. O R D E R ALL THESE APPEALS ARE FILED BY THE RESPECTIVE ASSESSE E S ARISING OUT OF DIFFERENT ORDERS OF THE RESPECTIVE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) , HY DERABAD FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEARS MENTIONED HEREIN ABOVE RESPECTIVELY. 2 ITA NO S . 183, 184, 186, 187 & 775 / HYD/201 9 2. AT THE OUTSET, THE LD. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES OF THE RESPECTIVE ASSESSE E S SUBMI TTED THAT THE ASSESSE E S DO NOT WANT TO PURSUE THE APPEALS AS THEY HAVE ALREADY FILED FORMS I & II UNDER THE DIRECT TAX VIVAD SE VISWAS SCHEME, 2020 AND RECEIVED FORM 3 IN ALL THE ABOVE APPEALS EXCEPT IN ITA NO.186/HYD/2019 , FORM 3 IS YET TO BE ISSUED BY THE DEPARTMENT. THEREFORE, CONSEQUENT TO THE SAME, THE ASSESSES DESIRES TO WITHDRAW THE APPEALS BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL. HENCE IT WAS PLEADED, THAT THE APPEALS OF THE ASSESSE E S MAY BE TREATED AS WITHDRAWN. 3. THE LD. DR CONCEDED TO THE REQUEST OF THE LD. AR. 4 . AFTER HEARING BOTH THE PARTIES, ACCORDING TO THE REQUEST OF THE ASSESSE E S AND THEIR LD. AR, WE HEREBY ALLOW THE APPEALS OF THE ASSESSE E S TO BE WITHDRAWN. WE ALSO MAKE IT CLEAR THAT THE ASSESSEE S SHALL BE AT LIBERTY TO APPROACH THE TRIBUNAL WIT HIN THE STIPULATED TIME AS PROVIDED UNDER THE ACT, IN ORDER TO REINSTATE THE APPEALS, IF THE IR APPLICATION S WITH RESPECT TO VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME ARE REJECTED. 7. IN THE RESULT, APPEALS OF ASSESSE E S ARE DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OP EN COURT ON 19 TH APRIL, 2 021. S D / - (S MT. P. MADHAVI DEVI ) JUDICIAL MEMBER HYDERABAD, DT. 19 TH APRIL, 2021. * REDDY GP 3 ITA NO S . 183, 184, 186, 187 & 775 / HYD/201 9 COPY TO : APPELLANT S. 1 . NIRMALA DEVI MUNDHRA, 15 - 2 - 458 TO 460, 2 ND FLOOR, KUSUM COMMERCIAL COMPLEX, KISHANGUNJ, HYDERABAD - 500 012 2 . MUNDHRA JAGDISH PRASAD (HUF), D.NO.15 - 2 - 458 TO 460, 2 ND FLOOR, KUSUM COMMERCIAL COMPLEX, KISHANGUNJ, HYDERABAD - 500 012 3 . CHANCHAL MUNDHRA, 2 ND FLOOR, KUSUM COMMERCIAL COMPLEX, KISHANGUNJ, HYDERABAD - 500 012 4 . JAGDISH PRASAD MUNDHRA, 15 - 2 - 458/460, 2 ND FLOOR, KUSUM COMMERCIAL COMPLEX, KISHANGUNJ, HYDERABAD - 500 012 5 . JAGDISH PRASAD MUNDHRA, 15 - 2 - 458/460, 2 ND FLOOR, KUSUM COMMERCIAL COMPLEX, KISHANGUNJ, HYDERABAD - 500 012 RESPONDENT S 1 INCOME TAX OFFICER , WARD 7(3) , HYDERAB AD. PR. C I T - 3 & 4, HYDERABAD. CIT(APPEALS) - 4 , HYDERABAD. CIT (APPEALS) - 3, HYDERABAD. DR. ITAT, HYDERABAD. GUARD FILE. BY ORDER SR. PVT. SECRETARY, ITAT, HYDERABAD.