Shri Mahudi Madhupuri Jain NSM Bhojanshala & Prashadi Bhavan, Mahudi V. The Income tax Officer,Ward-2, Exemption, Ahmedabad

ITA 184/AHD/2024

• Counselvise Citation: [2024] 100 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 1838 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)
• Duration Of Justice: 4 month(s) 1 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 03-06-2024
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: D
• Next Hearing Date: 20-05-2024
• Assessment Year: 2020-2021
• Appeal Filed On: 01-02-2024
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Keywords: Benefit of exemption; Revised return
• Section: 12; 10; 11; 139; 12A; 119(2)(b); 12AA; 10B; 143(1); 250; 139(1); 139(4)

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE SHRI SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI NARENDRA PRASAD SINHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 184/Ahd/2024 ( नधा रण वष / Assess ment Ye ar :2020-21) Sh ri M ah ud iM ad h up ur i Jai n NS M B ho ja ns h ala &P ra sh ad iB ha va n Ma hu di, T al uk a: M ans a, D is t: Ga nd hin ag ar , Gu jar at - 38 28 55 बनाम/ V s . CP C, B an ga lo re Pre se nt Ju ris di ct io n - IT O W ar d- 2, Exe mp ti on , Ah me da bad थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./P A N / G IR N o . : A A A T S 6 9 5 1 L (Appellant) . . (Respondent) अपीलाथ ओर से/Appellant by : Shri M. K. Patel, Advocate यथ क ओर से/Respondentby: Shri Aarsi Prasad, CIT- DR D a t e o f H e a r i n g 21/05/2024 D a t e o f P r o n o u n c e m e n t 04/06/2024 O R D E R PER SHRINARENDRA PRASAD SINHA, AM: This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of the Co mmissioner of Inco me Tax (Appeal), ADDL/JCIT ( A)-2, Mu mbai, (in short ‘the JCIT(A)’)dated 05.12.2023for the Assessment Year 2020-21 2. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a Trust and had filed its return of income for the A.Y. 2020-21 on 31.03.2021 declaring Nil ITA No.184/Ahd/2024 (Shri Mahudi Madhupuri Jain NSM Bhojanshala& Prashadi Bhavan vs. ITO) A.Y.– 2020-21- 2 – income. The Trust had also uploaded the audit report u/s 12A(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) in Form 10B on the IT Portal alongwith submission of the return. The return of income was processed u/s 143(1) of the Act on 24.12.2021 after disallowing exemption of Rs.4,28,49,304/- being amount applied for the purpose of the object of the Trust (revenue expenditure) and an amount of Rs.59,61,768/- accumulated or set apart for application to charitable purpose u/s11 of the Act. The assessee had filed an appeal before the CIT(A) against the adjustments made while processing the return. The Ld. JCIT(A) has upheld the adjustments vide the impugned order for the following reason: “6.7 The CPC, Bengaluru processed return u/s 143(1) disallowing revenue expenditure of Rs. 4,88,11,072/- u/s.11 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as the Return of Income and Form 10B was filed late. The due date for filing of Form 10B was 15.02.2021. Delay was condoned by CIT(Exemption), Ahmedabad vide order No. ITBA/COM/F/17/2022-23/1048595203(1) dated 10.01.2023. However the Return of Income has also been filed late on 31/3/2021 against the due date of 15/2/2021, which has not been condoned. It is a trite law that if a thing is said to be done in a particular manner, it shall be done in that manner and its performance in any other mode or fashion shall be of no consequence. Therefore, in application of the above decisions of the apex court and also the mandated provisions of the statute, the Assessing Officer has rightly disallowed the exemption claimed and made addition of the same to the total income of the appellant as per the provisions of section 143(1)(a)(ii). Accordingly, I am not inclined to interfere with the decision of the Assessing Officer. These grounds of appeal are hereby dismissed.” 3. Aggrieved with the order of the ld. JCIT(A), the assessee is in appeal before us and has taken following grounds in this appeal: “1. In law and in the facts and circumstances of the appellant's case, the order passed by the learned CIT(A) u/s 250 of the Income-tax Act is ab initio void being bad in law. 2. In law and in the facts and circumstances of the appellant's case, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in passing appellate order u/s 250 of the Act without providing "Video hearing" as envisaged in Faceless Appeal Procedure. ITA No.184/Ahd/2024 (Shri Mahudi Madhupuri Jain NSM Bhojanshala& Prashadi Bhavan vs. ITO) A.Y.– 2020-21- 3 – 3. In law and on the facts and in the circumstances of the case of appellant, the ld. CIT(A) has erred in upholding the contention of AO-CPC in not granting exemption of Rs.4,28,49,304 being amount applied for the purpose of the object of the Trust (Revenue Expenditure) and amount accumulated or set apart for application to charitable purpose (restricted to 15% of total receipts) for Rs.59,61,768 under Section 11 of the Act when no such adjustment is called for. 4. In law and on the facts and in the circumstances of the case of appellant, the ld. CIT(A) has erred in holding that appellant has not filed the return within time even when there is no such requirement for claiming exemption u/s 11 and 12.” 4. Shri M. K. Patel, ld. Advocate for the assessee submitted that the delay in filing the Form No.10B for A.Y. 2020-21 was condoned by the ld. CIT(E), Ahmedabad vide his order u/s. 119(2)(b) of the Act dated 10.01.2023. Further, the assessee had filed its return for A.Y. 2020-21 within the time limit as available u/s.139(4) of the Act. He submitted that the time limit of filing belated return u/s. 139(4) of the Act for A.Y. 2020- 21 was extended till 31 st May, 2021 by the CBDT vide Circular No. 8 of 2021 dated 30.04.2021. According to ld. AR, as the return was filed within the due date as applicable u/s.12A(1)(ba) of the Act, the assessee was entitled for benefit of exemption u/s 11 of the Act and the adjustments made by the CPC while processing return was not correct. 5. Shri Aarsi Prasad, ld. CIT-DR., on the other hand, submitted that as per provision of Section 12A(1)(ba) of the Act, the return of income was required to be furnished within the time limit as available u/s. 139(1) of the Act only. As the assessee did not file the return within this time limit, the adjustment made by the CPC and the disallowance of exemption u/s.11 of the Act was correctly made. 6. We have carefully considered the rival submissions. The provision of Section 12A of the Act stipulates that the provision of section 11 & ITA No.184/Ahd/2024 (Shri Mahudi Madhupuri Jain NSM Bhojanshala& Prashadi Bhavan vs. ITO) A.Y.– 2020-21- 4 – section 12 of the Act will not be applicable in relation to the income of any trust or institution, unless the conditions as prescribed u/s 12A are fulfilled. One of the condition as mentioned in Section 12A(1)(ba) of the Act is that return of income has to be furnished in accordance with the provisions of sub-section (4A) of Section 139 of the Act, within the time allowed under that section. The provision of Section 139(4A) of the Act is applicable to charitable trust who are required to furnish the return of income; as if it were a return required to be furnished under sub-section (1). It is on the strength of this provision that the contention of the department is that in order to claim exemption u/s 11 or 12 of the Act, the return of income has to be filed within the time limit as per Section 139(1) of the Act. 7. The provision of Section 12A(1)(ba) of the Act was amended w.e.f. 01.04.2023 and the time allowed for the filing of return was prescribed as ‘within the time allowed under sub-section (1) of sub-section (4) of that section’. Thus, there is no doubt that for A.Y. 2023-24 onwards the time limit for filing of return of the trust includes not only the time limit for filing the original return u/s 139(1) of the Act but also the time as available for filing belated return u/s 139(4) of the Act. 8. The contention of the ld. AR is that the above amendment was only clarificatory in nature and that the return for the earlier years filed within the time limit u/s 139(4) of the Act also gets this benefit. On the other hand, the Ld. CIT-DR has contended that for the years prior to A.Y. 2023- 24 the benefit of exemption u/s11 of the Act is available only to returns filed within the time limit as available u/s 139(1) of the Act. ITA No.184/Ahd/2024 (Shri Mahudi Madhupuri Jain NSM Bhojanshala& Prashadi Bhavan vs. ITO) A.Y.– 2020-21- 5 – 9. In order to resolve this controversy, it will be relevant to examine the Memorandum of the Finance Bill, 2023 which is found to be as under: 9. Denial of exemption where return of income is not furnished within time 9.1 As per the provisions of twentieth proviso to clause (23C) of section 10 of the Act, if the return of income is not furnished by a trust or institution under first regime within the time under section 139 of the Act, exemption under sub- clause (iv)/(v)/(vi)/(via) of clause (23C) of section 10 of the Act shall not be available to such trust or institution. a. Similarly, as per the provisions of clause (ba) of sub-section (1) of section 12A of theAct, if the return of income is not furnished by a trust or institution under the secondregime within the time under section 139 of the Act, exemption under section 11, 12 of theAct shall not be available to such trust or institution. b. Section 139 of the Act was amended by the Finance Act, 2022 providing for an option to the taxpayers to furnish updated return of income up to 2 years from the end of assessment year. c. This resulted in unintended consequences of allowing exemption under section 11, 12 of the Act and sub-clause (iv)/(v)/(vi)/(via) of clause (23C) of section 10 of the Act will be available to the trusts where they furnish updated return of income. Accordingly, it is proposed to clarify that the exemption under section 11, 12 and sub-clause (iv)/(v)/(vi)/(via) of clause (23C) of section 10 of the Act will be available only if the return of income has been furnished within the time allowed under sub-section (1) or sub- section (4) of section 139 of the Act. d. Hence, it is proposed to, a) amend the twentieth proviso of clause (23C) section 10 of the Act to provide that the fund or institution or trust or any university or other educational institution or any hospital or other medical institution referred to in sub-clause (iv) or sub-clause (v) or sub-clause (vi) or sub- clause (via) shall furnish the return of income for the previousyear in accordance with the provisions of sub-section (4C) of section 139 of the Act, within the time allowed under sub-section (1) or sub-section (4) of that section. b) amend clause (ba) of sub-section (1) of section 12A of the Act to provide that the person in receipt of the income shall furnish the return of income for the previous year in accordance with the provisions of sub- section (4A) of section 139 of the Act, within the time allowed under sub- section (1) or sub-section (4) of that section. ITA No.184/Ahd/2024 (Shri Mahudi Madhupuri Jain NSM Bhojanshala& Prashadi Bhavan vs. ITO) A.Y.– 2020-21- 6 – e. These amendments will take effect from 1 st April, 2023 and will accordingly apply in relation to the assessment year 2023-24 and subsequent assessment years.” 10. It is apparent from the above clarification that this amendment was introduced to exclude the category of updated returns of income u/s 139(8) of the Act. The requirement of Section 12A(1)(ba) of the Act for this year was that the return should be filed within the time allowed under that section (i.e. u/s. 139 of the Act). Section 139 provides time limit for filing of original return, belated return, revised return as well as updated return. Thus, all these category of returns were eligible for consideration under the general time line of section 139 of the Act. In order to exclude the category of updated return of income, this amendment was brought in to exclude the revised/updated category of returns and specific mention of section 139(1) & 139(4) of the Act was made in Section 12A(1)(ba) of the Act. It is apparent from the Memorandum that time limit for belated return u/s 139(4) of the Act was available for the earlier years as well which was continued and made specific vide this amendment. There is no dispute to the fact that the assessee has filed its return of income for this year within the time limit of section 139(4) of the Act. Therefore, the department was not correct in denying the exemption u/s11 of the Act while processing the return. 11. The Circular F No. 173/193/2019 –ITA-1, dated 23.04.2019 issued by the CBDT and relied upon by the assessee refers to Memorandum to the Finance Bill, 2017 and gives clarification in respect of amendment to section12A of the Act, that a person in receipt of the income chargeable to income tax shall furnish the return of income within the time allowed u/s 139 of the Act. As per this clarification, the return of income was required ITA No.184/Ahd/2024 (Shri Mahudi Madhupuri Jain NSM Bhojanshala& Prashadi Bhavan vs. ITO) A.Y.– 2020-21- 7 – to be filed within the time allowed u/s 139 of the Act and the relevant portion of the Circular is reproduced below: “2. In the matter, the memorandum explaining the relevant provisions of the Finance Bill, 2017 reads as under: "as per the existing provisions of said section, the entities registered under section 12AA are required to file return of income under sub- section (4A) of section 139, if the total income without giving effect to the provisions of sections 11 and 12 exceeds the maximum amount which is not chargeable to income tax. However, there is no clarity as to whether the said return of income is to be filed within time allowed under section 139 of the Act or otherwise. In order to provide clarity in this regard, it is proposed to further amend section 12A so as in provide for further-condition that the person in receipt of the income chargeable to income-tax shall furnish the return of income within the time allowed under section 139 of the Act. These amendments are clarificatory in nature. These amendments will take effect from 1st April, 2018 and will, accordingly, apply in relation to assessment year 2018-19 and subsequent years." 3. Additionally, an excerpt of circular No. 2/2018 dated 15-2-2018 "Explanatory Notes to the Provisions of the Finance Act, 2017" on insertion of clause (ba) in Sub-section (1) of section 12A is quoted as under: “The entities registered under section 12AA are required to file return of income under sub-section (4A) of section 139 of the Income-tax Act, if the total income without giving effect to the provisions of sections 11 and 12 exceeds the maximum amount which is not chargeable to income-tax. Amendment to section 12A of the Income-tax has been made so as to provide for additional condition that the person in receipt of the income chargeable to income-tax shall furnish the return of income within the time allowed under section 139 of the Income-tax Act." 3. Thus, for a trust registered under section 12AA of the Act to avail the benefit of exemption under section 11 shall inter-alia file its return of income within the time allowed under section 139 of the Act. Accordingly, orders under section 143(1)(a) in those cases in which demand has been raised on this issue may please be rectified.” (Emphasis supplied) 12. It is, thus, clear from the above Circular that exemption u/s 11 of the Act was available in respect of the return of income filed u/s 139 of the Act. This Circular does not mandate that the return has to be filed only ITA No.184/Ahd/2024 (Shri Mahudi Madhupuri Jain NSM Bhojanshala& Prashadi Bhavan vs. ITO) A.Y.– 2020-21- 8 – within the time limit available u/s 139(1) of the Act and rather directs to rectify the unjust demand raised u/s 143(1)(a) of the Act. As the assessee had filed its return of income within the time limit of section 139(4) of the Act, it was eligible for benefit of exemption u/s 11 of the Act. It has been held by the Ld. ITAT, Rajkot Bench in the case of Shri Rajkot Vishashrimali Jain Samaj, [2023] 150 taxmann.com 361 (Rajkot-Tri), which has been relied upon by the assessee, that if the assessee had filed return of income after due date of filing of return u/s.139(1) of the Act but before due date prescribed u/s 139(4) of the Act, benefit of exemption u/s 11 of the Act can’t be denied to the assessee by invoking the provisions of Section 12A(1)(ba) of the Act. 13. In view of the above provisions of law, the clarificatory Circular of the CBDT as well as the judicial pronouncement, we are of the considered opinion that the department was not correct in disallowing exemption u/s 11 of the Act while processing the return, as the return of income was filed by the assessee within the due date as per the provisions of the Act. Accordingly, findings of the Ld. JCIT(A) is reversed and the department is directed to allow the exemption u/s. 11 of the Act as claimed by the assessee. 14. In the result, appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed. This Order pronounced on 04/06/2024 Sd/- Sd/- (SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL) (NARENDRA PRASAD SINHA) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Ahmedabad; Dated 04/06/2024 S. K. SINHA आदेश क त ल प अ े षत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : ITA No.184/Ahd/2024 (Shri Mahudi Madhupuri Jain NSM Bhojanshala& Prashadi Bhavan vs. ITO) A.Y.– 2020-21- 9 – 1. अपीलाथ / The Appellant 2. यथ / The Respondent. 3. संबं धत आयकर आय ु त / Concerned CIT 4. आयकर आय ु त(अपील) / The CIT(A)- 5. "वभागीय &त&न ध, आयकर अपील)य अ धकरण, अहमदाबाद / DR, ITAT, Ahmedabad 6. गाड/ फाईल / Guard file. आदेशान ु सार/ BY ORDER, उप/सहायक पंजीकार (Dy./Asstt.Registrar) आयकर अपील$य अ%धकरण, अहमदाबाद / ITAT, Ahmedabad