MUKTA PRAKASH PARANJPE, Erandwane V. ITO(IT)-3, Pune

ITA 1864/PUN/2019

• Counselvise Citation: [2020] 110 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 6048 (ITAT-PUNE)
• Duration Of Justice: 10 month(s) 1 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 28-09-2020
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Assessment Year: 2015-2016
• Appeal Filed On: 26-11-2019
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: USHA GAYAKWAD
• Assessee Lawyers: MANDAR KHARPUDIKAR
• Section: 20

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL A BENCH, PUNE (THROUGH VIRTUAL COURT) BEFORE SHRI R.S.SYAL, VP AND SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY , JM . / I TA NO. 1864 /PUN/20 19 / ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2015 - 16 MUKTA PRAKASH PARANJPE ALLIANCE CHITRALEKHA CONDOMINIUM, PLOT NO.82/3A, CTS NO.55/3A, FLAT NO.201, ASHOK PATH, ERANDWANE, PUNE - 411 004. PAN : AXCPP3600J ....... / APPELLANT / V/S. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (IT) - 3, PUNE. / RESPONDENT A SSESSEE BY : SHRI MANDAR KHARPUDIKAR REVENUE BY : SMT. USHA GAYAKWAD / DATE OF HEARING : 28 .0 9 .2020 / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 28 .0 9 .2020 / ORDER PER PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHU RY, JM : THIS APPEAL PREFERRED BY THE ASSESSEE EMANATES FROM THE ORDER OF THE LD. CIT(APPEALS) - 13, PUNE DATED 31.07.2019 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2015 - 16 AS PER GROUNDS OF APPEAL ON RECORD. 2. AT THE OUTSET, THE ASSESSEE HAS FILED AN APPLICATION DATED 23.09.2020 PRAYING FOR WITHDRAWING THE APPEAL BY STATING AS FOLLOWS: 2 ITA NO. 1864 /PUN/20 19 A.Y. 2015 - 16 A. THE ASSESSEE HAD FILED AN APPEAL WITH THE ITAT AS AGGRIEVED BY THE ORDER PASSED U/S.250 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 BY CIT(A) DATED 27 TH JANUARY, 2018. B. FURTHER, THE ASSESSEE DECIDED TO OPT THE SAME CASE UNDER DIRECT TAX VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME. C. THE ASSESSEE HAS FILED THE NECESSARY DTVS V FORM WITH THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND THE ASSESSEE HAS GOT THE APPROVAL FROM COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DATED 10 TH SEP. 2020 ( COPY IS ATTACHED). D. IN FURTHERANCE TO THE REQUIREMENT OF THE DTVSV SCHEME, WE NEED TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL AS FILED WI TH THE ITAT AND HENCE, WE REQUEST YOUR HONOUR TO PASS THE ORDER TO THAT EFFECT. LD. DR HAS NOT OBJECTED TO THE PRAYER OF THE ASSESSEE FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE APPEAL. HENCE, WE PERMIT THE WITHDRAWAL. APPEAL OF ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED BEING WITHDRAWN. 3. I N THE RESULT, APPEAL OF ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED BEING WITHDRAWN . ORDER PRO NOUNCED ON 28 TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 20 20 . SD/ - SD/ - R.S.SYAL PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY VICE PRESIDENT JUDICIAL MEMBER / PUNE; / DATED : 28 TH SEPTEMBER , 2020. SB / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. / THE APPELLANT. 2. / THE RESPONDENT. 3. THE CIT(APPEALS) - 13, PUNE. 4. THE CIT(IT/TP) - PUNE. 5 . , , , / DR, ITAT, A BENCH, PUNE. 6 . / GUARD FILE. / BY ORDER, // TRUE COPY // / PRIVATE SECRETARY , / ITAT, PUNE . 3 ITA NO. 1864 /PUN/20 19 A.Y. 2015 - 16 DATE 1 DRAFT DICTATED ON 28 .0 9 .2020 SR.PS/PS 2 DRAFT PLACED BEFORE AUTHOR 28 .0 9 .2020 SR.PS/PS 3 DRAFT PROPOSED AND PLACED BEFORE THE SECOND MEMBER JM/AM 4 DRAFT DISCUSSED/APPROVED BY SECOND MEMBER AM/JM 5 APPROVED DRAFT COMES TO THE SR. PS/PS SR.PS/PS 6 KEPT FOR PRONOUNCEMENT ON SR.PS/PS 7 DATE OF UPLOADING OF ORDER SR.PS/PS 8 FILE SENT TO BENCH CLERK SR.PS/PS 9 DATE ON WHICH THE FILE GOES TO THE HEAD CLERK 10 DATE ON WHICH FILE GOES TO THE A.R 11 DATE OF DISPATCH OF ORDER