M/s. Osaka Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd., Vadodara V. The Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-4, Baroda

ITA 1867/AHD/2016

• Counselvise Citation: [2017] 127 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 8433 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 2 month(s) 8 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 22-09-2017
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Assessment Year: 2011-2012
• Appeal Filed On: 14-07-2016
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: G C DAXINI

Judgement Text

, ,L ,L,L ,L- -- -,E ,E,E ,E- -- -LH LHLH LH- -- - IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL SMC BENCH, AHMEDABAD LOZJH EGKOHJ IZLKN] U;KF;D LNL; ,OA VEJTHR FLAG] LOZJH EGKOHJ IZLKN] U;KF;D LNL; ,OA VEJTHR FLAG] LOZJH EGKOHJ IZLKN] U;KF;D LNL; ,OA VEJTHR FLAG] LOZJH EGKOHJ IZLKN] U;KF;D LNL; ,OA VEJTHR FLAG] YS [KK LNL; DS LE{KA YS[KK LNL; DS LE{KA YS[KK LNL; DS LE{KA YS[KK LNL; DS LE{KA (BEFORE SHRI MAHAVIR PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ) ./ I.T.A. NO. 1867/AHD/2016 ( / ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2011-12) M/S. OSAKA PHARMACEUTICALS PVT. LTD. OLD NH NO.8, SANKARDA, DIST. VADODARA - 391350 / VS. ACIT CIRCLE - 4 BARODA ./ ./ PAN/GIR NO. : AAACO 6725 E ( / APPELLANT ) .. ( / RESPONDENT ) / APPELLANT BY : --NONE-- / RESPONDENT BY : SHRI G.C. DAXINI, SR. D.R. / DATE OF HEARING 20/09/2017 !'# / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 22/09/2017 $% / O R D E R PER SHRI MAHAVIR PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER : THIS IS AN APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE OR DER OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS)-2, VADODARA, DA TED 28/04/2016 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR (AY) 2011-12. 2. THE NOTICE OF HEARING WAS SENT TO THE ASSESSEE B Y REGISTERED POST AS PER THE ADDRESS GIVEN IN COLUMN NO.10 OF FORM NO . 36. HOWEVER, AT THE TIME OF HEARING NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE NOR ANY APPLICATION FOR ADJOURNMENT HAS BEEN FILED. FROM T HIS, IT IS REASONABLE TO ITA NO. 1867/AH D/2016 M/S. OSAKA PHARMACEUTICALS PVT. LTD. ASST.YEAR 2011-12 - 2 - INFER THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT SERIOUS TO PURSUE IT S CASE. HONBLE SUPREME COURT IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. B.N. BHATTACHARGEE AND ANOTHER, 118 ITR 461(SC) OBSERVED THAT PREFERRING AN APPEAL MEANS EF FECTIVELY PURSUING IT. HONBLE M.P. HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF ESTATE OF LA TE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR VS. CWT, 223 ITR 480(M.P.) DISMISSED THE REFERENCE FILED BY THE ASSESSEE FOR NOT TAKING NECESSARY STEPS. SIMILAR V IEW IS TAKEN BY I.T.A.T., DELHI BENCH IN THE CASE OF MULTIPLAN INDI A LTD., 38 ITD 320. CONSIDERING THE ABOVE, IT APPEARS THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING ITS APPEAL. WE, THEREFORE, DISMISS THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE FOR NON-PROSECUTION. 3. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS D ISMISSED. THIS ORDER PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT ON 22/09/2017 SD/- SD/- VEJTHR FLAG VEJTHR FLAG VEJTHR FLAG VEJTHR FLAG &' $ ( $ ) ()* $ ) ( AMARJIT SINGH ) ( MAHAVIR PR ASAD ) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER AHMEDABAD; DATED 22/09/2017 PRITI YADAV, SR. PS !'# $#! / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. / THE APPELLANT 2. / THE RESPONDENT. 3. , -. / / CONCERNED CIT 4. / ( ) / THE CIT(A)-2, VADODARA. 5. 012 **-. , -.# , '&$,$ / DR, ITAT, AHMEDABAD 6. 245 6 / GUARD FILE. % & / BY ORDER, 0 * //TRUE COPY '/& () (DY./ASSTT.REGISTRAR) , / ITAT, AHMEDABAD