आयकर अपील य अ धकरण, ‘‘सी’’ यायपीठ, चे नई IN THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘C’ BENCH, CHENNAI ी ए. मोहन अलंकामणी, लेखा सद य एवं ी धु वु आर.एल रे डी, या यक सद य के सम Before Shri A. Mohan Alankamony, Accountant Member & Shri Duvvuru RL Reddy, Judicial Member आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.1867/Mds/2016 नधा रण वष /As s ess ment Year: 2010-11 Shri P. Ramanathan, Old No. New No. 13, Stringers Street, Chennai 600 108. [PAN: AAAPR8182L] Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Business Ward IX (2), Chennai 600 006. (अपीलाथ /Appellant) ( यथ /Respondent) अपीलाथ क ओर से / Appellant by : None यथ क ओर से/Respondent by : Shri A.V. Sreekanth, JCIT सुनवाई क तार ख/ Da te o f h e a r i n g : 12.09.2016 घोषणा क तार ख /Da te o f Pr o n o u n ce me n t : 23.09.2016 आदेश /O R D E R PER DUVVURU RL REDDY, JUDICIAL MEMBER: This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) 13, Chennai, dated 28.03.2016 relevant to the assessment year 2010-11. 2. None appeared on behalf of the assessee or any adjournment application has been filed when the appeal was taken up for hearing on I.T.A. No.1867/M/16 2 12.09.2016 despite issue of notice for hearing. Hence, it is inferred that the assessee is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. 3. Therefore, having regard to Rule 19(2) of ITAT Rules and following the decision of the Delhi Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Multiplan (India) Ltd. (38 ITD 320) and the judgment of the Hon’ble Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of late Tukojirao Holkar (223 ITR 480), the appeal of the assessee is dismissed for want of prosecution. 4. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed. Order pronounced on the 23 rd September, 2016 at Chennai. Sd/- Sd/- (A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (DUVVURU RL REDDY) JUDICIAL MEMBER Chennai, Dated, the 23.09.2016 Vm/- आदेश क त ल प अ े षत/Copy to: 1. अपीलाथ /Appellant, 2. यथ / Respondent, 3. आयकर आयु त (अपील)/CIT(A), 4. आयकर आयु त/CIT, 5. वभागीय त न ध/DR & 6. गाड फाईल/GF.