Smt. Varsha Tekwani, Baroda V. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-5(4), Baroda

ITA 1892/AHD/2016

• Counselvise Citation: [2017] 127 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 8408 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 2 month(s) 4 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 22-09-2017
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Assessment Year: 2009-2010
• Appeal Filed On: 18-07-2016
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL

Judgement Text

, ,L ,L,L ,L- -- -,E ,E,E ,E- -- -LH LHLH LH IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL SMC BENCH, AHMEDABAD LOZJH EGKOHJ IZLKN] U;KF;D LNL; ,OA VEJTHR FLAG] LOZJH EGKOHJ IZLKN] U;KF;D LNL; ,OA VEJTHR FLAG] LOZJH EGKOHJ IZLKN] U;KF;D LNL; ,OA VEJTHR FLAG] LOZJH EGKOHJ IZLKN] U;KF;D LNL; ,OA VEJTHR FLAG] YS [KK LNL; DS LE{KA YS[KK LNL; DS LE{KA YS[KK LNL; DS LE{KA YS[KK LNL; DS LE{KA (BEFORE SHRI MAHAVIR PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ) ./ I.T.A. NO.1892/AHD/2016 ( / ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2009-10) SMT. VARSHA TEKWANI FLAT NO.302, 3 RD FLOOR, JAY RANCHHOD AVENUE, D-190, DAJI NAGAR, HARNI WARSIA RING ROAD, BARODA-390006 / VS. THE INCOME TAX OFFICE WARD-5(4), BARODA ./ ./ PAN/GIR NO. : AFNPT 8436 R ( / APPELLANT ) .. ( / RESPONDENT ) / APPELLANT BY : -NONE- / RESPONDENT BY : SHRI PRASOON KABRA, SR. DR / DATE OF HEARING 20/09/2017 !'# / DATE OF PRONOUN CEMENT 22/09/2017 $% / O R D E R PER SHRI MAHAVIR PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER : THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS)- 3, VADODARA, D ATED 01/03/2016 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR (AY) 2009-10. 2. AT THE TIME OF HEARING NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. NOTICE OF HEARING WAS SENT THROUGH RPAD POST, BUT T HE SAME WAS RETURNED BY THE POSTAL AUTHORITIES WITH THE REMARK NOT KNOW N, WHICH IS PLACED ON ITA NO.1892/ AH D/2016 SMT. VARSHA TEKWANI. VS.ITO ASST.YEAR 2009-10 - 2 - RECORD. THE ASSESSEE HAS ALSO NOT FILED ANY APPLICA TION FOR ADJOURNMENT OF THE CASE. THEREFORE, IT IS PRESUMED THAT THE ASSESS EE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PURSUING WITH ITS APPEAL BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL, THERE FORE, FOLLOWING ORDER OF THE ITAT, DELHI BENCH IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA PVT. LTD., 38 ITD 320 (DELHI), WE DISMISS THE APPEAL OF THE ASSES SEE IN LIMINE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. 3. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISS ED. THIS ORDER PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT ON 22/09/2017 SD/- SD/- VEJTHR FLAG VEJTHR FLAG VEJTHR FLAG VEJTHR FLAG &' $ ( $ ) ()* $ ) ( AMARJIT SINGH ) ( MAHAVIR PR ASAD ) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER AHMEDABAD; DATED 22/09/2017 !'# $#! / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. / THE APPELLANT 2. / THE RESPONDENT. 3. , -. / / CONCERNED CIT 4. / () / THE CIT(A)-3, VADODARA 5. 012 **-. , -.# , '&$,$ / DR, ITAT, AHMEDABAD 6. 245 6 / GUARD FILE. % & / BY ORDER, 0 * //TRUE COPY// '/& () ( DY./ASSTT.REGISTRAR) , / ITAT, AHMEDABAD