P A G E 1 | 2 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CUTTACK BENCH, CUTTACK BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARG , JUDICIAL MEMBER AND LAXMI PRASAD SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO .194 /CTK/201 8 ASSESSMENT YEAR : 201 3 - 14 MR GURDAYAL SINGH,PROP. M/S. GURU NANAK ROADLINES, AT: PUNJABI PARA, BARBIL, KEONJHAR VS. ACIT, CIRCLE - 2(1), CUTTACK PAN/GIR NO. ACBPS 9601 H (APPELLANT ) .. ( RESPONDENT ) ASSESSEE BY : SHRI B.R. PANDA , AR REVENUE BY : SHRI S UBHENDU DUTTA , DR DATE OF HEARING : 1 3 / 0 6 / 201 9 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 01 / 0 7 / 201 9 O R D E R PER LAXMI PRASAD SAHU, AM THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE PR. CIT, CUTTACK DATED 28.3.2018 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2012 - 13. 2. AT THE TIME OF HEARING, LD A.R. OF THE ASSESSEE FILED A COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 29.12.2018 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2013 - 14 IN PURSUANCE TO THE LD PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX PASSED U/S.263 OF THE ACT ON 28.3.2018, WHEREIN, THE ASSESSED INCOME IS DETERMINED AT RS.2,00,28,550/ - AS WAS DETERMINED IN ITA NO.194/CTK/2018 ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2013 - 14 P A G E 2 | 2 THE ORIGINAL ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 25.3.2016. HENCE, IT WAS HIS PRAYER THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS NO FURTHER GRIEVANCE. 3. LD D.R. ALSO AGREED TO ABOVE SUBMISSION OF LD A.R. OF THE ASSESSEE. 4. IN THE ABOVE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE, WE DISMISS THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE AS INFRUCTUOUS BEING NOT PRESSED. 5. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED ON 0 1 / 0 7 /201 9 . SD/ - SD/ - ( CHANDRA MOHAN GARG ) (LAXMI PRASAD SAHU) JUDICIALMEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER CUTTACK; DATED 01 / 0 7 /20 9 B.K.PARIDA, SPS COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : BY ORDER SR . PVT. S ECRETARY ITAT, CUTTACK 1. THE APPELLANT : MR GURDAYAL SINGH,PROP . M/S. GURU NANAK ROADLINES, AT: PUNJABI PARA, BARBIL, KEONJHAR 2. THE RESPONDENT. ACIT, CIRCLE - 2(1), CUTTACK 3. THE PR. CIT(A) CUTTACK 4. CIT (A) , CUTTACK. 5. DR, ITAT, C UTTACK 6. GUARD FILE. //TRUE COPY//