The DCIT, Circle-3(3), Ahmedabad V. Shri Rameshkumar Trikamlal Padhiyar, Ahmedabad

ITA 1945/AHD/2016

• Counselvise Citation: [2018] 112 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 5581 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s) 3 month(s) 19 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 15-11-2018
• Appeal Filed By: Department
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: Not Allotted
• Assessment Year: 2010-2011
• Appeal Filed On: 27-07-2016
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: S K DEV
• Assessee Lawyers: PF JAIN
• Keywords: Tax effect

Judgement Text

, , ,, , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL A BENCH, AHMEDABAD LOZJH LOZJH LOZJH LOZJH EGKOHJ EGKOHJ EGKOHJ EGKOHJ IZLKN] U; IZLKN] U; IZLKN] U; IZLKN] U;KF KFKF KF;D LNL; , ;D LNL; , ;D LNL; , ;D LNL; ,OA OAOA OA OLHE OLHE OLHE OLHE VGEN] YS[KK LNL; DS LE{KA VGEN] YS[KK LNL; DS LE{KA VGEN] YS[KK LNL; DS LE{KA VGEN] YS[KK LNL; DS LE{KA BEFORE SHRI MAHAVIR PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI WASEEM AHMED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ./ I.T.A. NO. 1945/AHD/2016 ( / ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2010-11) DCIT, CIR 3(3), AHMEDABAD. / VS. SHRI RAMESHKUMAR TRIKAMLAL PADHIYAR, B/604, PRAYAG RESIDENCY, BODAKDEV, AHMEDABAD - 380054 ./ ./ PAN/GIR NO. : ACKPP 6965 H ( / APPELLANT ) .. ( / RESPONDENT ) / APPELLANT BY : SHRI S. K. DEV, SR. D.R. / RESPONDENT BY : SHRI P. F. JAIN, A.R. / DATE OF HEARING 14/11/2018 / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 15/11/2018 !' / O R D E R PER MAHAVIR PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER: THE CAPTIONED APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED AT THE INSTANCE OF THE REVENUE AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEAL)-3, AHMEDABAD [CIT(A) IN SHORT] DATED 30.05.2016 ARISIN G IN THE MATTER OF PENALTY ORDER PASSED UNDER S.271(1)(C) OF THE INCOM E TAX ACT, 1961(HERE-IN-AFTER REFERRED TO AS 'THE ACT') DATED 31.03.2015 RELEVANT TO ASSESSMENT YEAR (AY) 2010-11. ITA NO.1945/AHD/2016 DCIT VS. SHRI RAMESHKUMAR T. PADHIYAR A .Y. 2010-11 - 2 - 2. THE GROUNDS OF APPEAL RAISED BY THE REVENUE AR E AS UNDER:- 1. THE LD.CIT(A) HAS ERRED IN LAW AND ON FACTS I N DELETING THE PENALTY OF RS.10,74,128/- LEVIED U/S.271(1)(C) OF T HE ACT. 2. THE LD. CIT(A) HAS ERRED IN LAW AND ON FACTS B Y NOT CONSIDERING THAT THE QUANTUM ADDITIONS ON WHICH PENALTY WAS LEV IED BY THE AO, WAS UPHELD BY THE APPELLATE AUTHORITY ON MERIT. 3. ON THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE, TH E LD. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (A) OUGHT TO HAVE UPHELD THE ORDER OF THE ASSESSING OFFICER. 4. IT IS, THEREFORE, PRAYED THAT THE ORDER OF THE LD. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (A) MAY BE SET-ASIDE AND THAT OF THE ASS ESSING OFFICER BE RESTORED. 3. AT THE TIME OF THE HEARING, WE OBSERVE THAT THE TAX EFFECT IN THE APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE IS LESS THAN RS. 20 LAC S. AS PER THE CIRCULAR NO. 3 OF 2018 DATED 11/07/2018 ISSUED BY CBDT RECEN TLY ALL PENDING APPEALS FILED BY REVENUE ARE LIABLE TO BE DISMISSED / WITHDRAWN/ NOT PRESSED TO REDUCE THE LITIGATION WHERE THE TAX EFFE CT DOES NOT EXCEED THE PRESCRIBED MONETARY LIMIT, I.E., RS.20 LACS. THE R ELEVANT EXTRACT OF THE CIRCULAR IS REPRODUCED BELOW: 2. IN SUPERSESSION OF THE ABOVE CIRCULAR, IT HAS BEEN DECIDED BY THE BOARD THAT DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS MAY BE FILED ON MER ITS BEFORE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AND HIGH COURTS AND S LPS/ APPEALS BEFORE SUPREME COURT KEEPING IN VIEW THE MO NETARY LIMITS AND CONDITIONS SPECIFIED BELOW. 3. HENCEFORTH, APPEALS/ SLPS SHALL NOT BE FILED IN CASES WHERE THE TAX EFFECT DOES NOT EXCEED THE MONETARY LIMITS GIVE N HEREUNDER: S. NO. APPEALS/ SLPS IN INCOME-TAX MATTERS MONETARY LIMIT (RS.) 1. BEFORE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL 20,00,000 2. BEFORE HIGH COURT 50,00,000 ITA NO.1945/AHD/2016 DCIT VS. SHRI RAMESHKUMAR T. PADHIYAR A .Y. 2010-11 - 3 - 3. BEFORE SUPREME COURT 1,00,00,000 THE MONETARY LIMIT FOR FILING THE APPEALS BY THE RE VENUE BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL HAS BEEN INCREASED TO RS. 20 LACS. IT IS A LSO CLARIFIED IN THE SAID CIRCULAR THAT THE SAID MONETARY LIMIT IS APPLICABLE RETROSPECTIVELY EVEN TO THE APPEALS PENDING BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL. THE CBDT H AS ALSO INSTRUCTED THAT SUCH PENDING APPEALS BELOW THIS SPECIFIED TAX LIMIT OF RS.20 LACS MAY BE WITHDRAWN / NOT PRESSED . IN THE CASE ON HAND, IT WAS NOTICED THAT THE TAX EF FECT ON THE DISPUTED ISSUE RAISED BY THE REVENUE IS CLAIMED TO BE LESS R S.20 LACS. THEREFORE APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS REQUIRED TO BE DISMISSED IN LIMINE IN TERMS OF THE ABOVE CIRCULAR. 4. THE LD. DR FOR THE REVENUE FAIRLY AGREED ON THE APPLICABILITY OF THE CBDT CIRCULAR NO. 3 OF 2018. ACCORDINGLY, THE A PPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS DISMISSED AS NOT MAINTAINABLE. HOWEVER, THE REVENUE IS AT THE LIBERTY TO MOVE THE MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION T O RECALL THE ORDER IF THE TAX EFFECT EXCEEDS THE THRESHOLD LIMIT OR THE CASE OF THE REVENUE FALLS IN ANY OF THE EXCEPTION PROVIDED IN THE AFORESAID CBDT CIRCULAR IN ANY MANNER. THE MA SHALL BE FILED WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME. HENCE THE APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS DISMISSED. ITA NO.1945/AHD/2016 DCIT VS. SHRI RAMESHKUMAR T. PADHIYAR A .Y. 2010-11 - 4 - 5. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE DEPARTMEN T IS DISMISSED. THIS ORDER PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT ON 15/11/2018 SD/- SD/- OLHE VGEN OLHE VGEN OLHE VGEN OLHE VGEN EGKOHJ IZLKN EGKOHJ IZLKN EGKOHJ IZLKN EGKOHJ IZLKN YKS[KK LN YKS[KK LN YKS[KK LN YKS[KK LNL; L; L; L; U;KF;D LNL; U;KF;D LNL; U;KF;D LNL; U;KF;D LNL; (WASEEM AHMED) (MAHAVIR PRASAD) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER AHMEDABAD; DATED 15/11/2018 PRITI YADAV, SR.PS !' #' / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. / THE APPELLANT 2. / THE RESPONDENT. 3. %&' ( / CONCERNED CIT 4. ( () / THE CIT(A)-3, AHMEDABAD. 5. +, - ..&' , &' , 01! % ! / DR, ITAT, AHMEDABAD. 6. - 23 4 / GUARD FILE. $ % / BY ORDER, + . //TRUE COPY// &/% () ( DY./ASSTT.REGISTRAR) , / ITAT, AHMEDABAD