, , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM . . . . , . . . . , $ $ $ $ BEFORE SHRI V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI G. MANJUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ./ I.T.A.NO.198/VIZ/2015 ( / ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2006-07) ACI T , CIRCLE - 1(1) , RAJAHMUNDRY. VS. M/S. K.L. REDDY & COMPANY, D.NO. 31-21-12, VENKATESWARA NAGAR, RAJAHMUNDRY. [ PAN : AAGFK 1926 P] ( & & & & / APPELLANT) ( '(& '(& '(& '(& / RESPONDENT ) & ) / ASSESSEE BY : SHRI G.V.N. HARI ADVOCATE. '(& ) / REVENUE BY : SHRI M.N. MURTHY NAIK - DR ) - / DATE OF HEARING : 22/12/2015 ) - / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 22/12/2015 / O R D E R PER BENCH: THIS APPEAL IS FILED BY THE REVENUE AGAINST THE ORD ER OF THE CIT(A), RAJAHMUNDRY DATED 09/03/2015 FOR THE A.Y. 2 006-07. 2 . WHEN THIS APPEAL IS TAKEN UP FOR HEARING, THE LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE HAS SUBMITTED THAT THE TAX EFFECT INVOLVED IN THIS APPEAL IS BELOW RS. 10 LAC. AS PER THE LATEST CIRCULAR NO.21 /2015 OF CBDT DATED 2 ITA NO.198 /VIZ/2015 10/12/2015, BEING RETROSPECTIVE IN NATURE, THE APPE AL FILED BY THE REVENUE IS NOT MAINTAINABLE. THE LD. D.R. HAS NOT RAISED ANY OBJECTION. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE, THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE REVE NUE IS NOT MAINTAINABLE. HENCE, THE SAME IS DISMISSED. 3 . IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 22 ND DECEMBER, 2015. SD/- SD/- ( . ) ( . . . . ) ( (( ( V. DURGA RAO ) )) ) ( G. MANJUNATHA) / // / JUDICIAL MEMBER / // / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER /VISAKHAPATNAM: 3 / DATED : 22/12/2015 VR/SPS ) ' 4 / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO :- 1. & / THE APPELLANT ACIT, CIRCLE-1(1), RAJAHMUNDRY. 2. '(& / THE RESPONDENT M/S. K.L. REDDY & COMPANY, D.NO. 31-21-12, VENKATESWARA NAGAR, RAJAHMUNDRY. 3. 5 / THE CIT, RAJAHMUNDRY. 4. 5 () / THE CIT (A), RAJAHMUNDRY. 5. ' , , / // / DR, ITAT, VISAKHAPATNAM. 6 . . . . / GUARD FILE / BY ORDER // TRUE COPY // 9: ( SR.PRIVATE SECRETARY ) , / // / ITAT, VISAKHAPATNAM